I know that, but the genesis of a lot of the (ungodly) back and forth that you incite comes from the misstatement of others' positions in service of your snark.
My head is spinning from this attempt at misdirection.
So now you're the one representing the more extreme version of the opposite side of the argument you rallied against?
Now you're saying the Iowa State coaches, particularly the only one that was conceeded as having a halfway unshitty season, won a NC as an assistant somewhere else (as did Chizik)? That the Iowa State coaches couldn't meet their world-beating potential because they were chained to an unwinnable black hole of a program?
And you're saying this was your position all along? Everyone else are the idiots that said that being unsuccesful there is a directly transferable guage for how they will perform at another program?
Just wanna make sure I follow...