« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2009, 11:07:38 PM »
Personally, if 1966 was Auburn, I would probably claim it. The two teams in front of Alabama tied each other, and didn't play in bowl games. Last I checked, winning all your games was better than having a tie in your record.
Also, the Sugar Bowl victory that Alabama had came against a Nebraska team that was 9-1, and ranked #6 in the country. Nebraska's one loss was by one point, 10-9, on the road to Oklahoma. Alabama didn't just beat this 9-1 Nebraska team, they killed them 34-7 in the Sugar Bowl.
The clincher for me is that I don't think Michigan State was that good, and Notre Dame tied them. Michigan State's three toughest opponents were all down that year. Michigan was 6-4. Penn State was 5-5. Ohio State was 4-5. In fact, 9-2 Purdue was the only team on their schedule with more than 6 wins. To me their 9-0 record going into the Notre Dame game was about as respectable as Hawaii's undefeated season a couple years back.
However, I'll acknowledge the 1966 team as soon as Alabama hands over the 1972 SEC title to Auburn, the rightful owner.
Alabama went 7-1 in the SEC. Auburn went 6-1. Auburn's loss was to LSU, but we beat Alabama. But because Alabama played one extra SEC game that year, they win by % points. 
Take it. It's yours.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2009, 11:08:11 PM by No Huddle »
Logged
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"So I want everybody to think here for a second, how much does this game mean to you? 'Cause if it means something to you, you can't stand still. You understand? You play fast! You play strong! You go out there and dominate the man you're playing against, and you make his ass quit! That's our trademark! That's our M.O.... as a team! That's what people know us as!" ~ Nick Saban
21 Replies
3811 Views