Auburn #28....AP Poll...

Argo · « **Reply #20 on:** September 20, 2009, 04:37:25 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on September 20, 2009, 04:34:58 PM

Having seen both play? I'd take WVU over VT eight out of ten times.

Based on what? Piling up 500 yards of offense against a shitty defense?

Kaos · « **Reply #21 on:** September 20, 2009, 04:42:40 PM »

Quote from: Argo on September 20, 2009, 04:37:25 PM

Based on what? Piling up 500 yards of offense against a poopty defense?

No. Athleticism. That Brown kid has unimited potential. Devine would be hard for anybody to bring down. They've got some real weapons.

In fact, I think there's as much raw talent there as anywhere. I just think their coach is vastly overrated. You give somebody else that kind of talent and you're looking at a juggernaut.

Man for man, that team was better than Auburn at almost every position.

I don't think that mummified guy they have coaching can get the most out of it, though.

Argo · « **Reply #22 on:** September 20, 2009, 04:51:14 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on September 20, 2009, 04:42:40 PM

No. Athleticism. That Brown kid has unimited potential. Devine would be hard for anybody to bring down. They've got some real weapons.

In fact, I think there's as much raw talent there as anywhere. I just think their coach is vastly overrated. You give somebody else that kind of talent and you're looking at a juggernaut.

Man for man, that team was better than Auburn at almost every position.

I don't think that mummified guy they have coaching can get the most out of it, though.

West Virginia has talent, and speed, but I still believe a team with a physical defense and physical running game will beat them almost every time.

I have the same thoughts about this Auburn team. Sure, they are a LOT better on offense than I expected, but when a team can successfully keep pressure on Todd for the better part of the night, I don't think he can handle it. As for the defense, they were completely gassed last night. They still fought hard. I believe they'll respond differently when they are worn down by a physical team instead of a finesse team.

After watching how physical Tennessee was against the mighty Tebows yesterday, I now think that will be a damn good game.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #23 on:** September 20, 2009, 04:54:45 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on September 20, 2009, 04:42:40 PM

No. Athleticism. That Brown kid has unimited potential. Devine would be hard for anybody to bring down. They've got some real weapons.

In fact, I think there's as much raw talent there as anywhere. I just think their coach is vastly overrated. You give somebody else that kind of talent and you're looking at a juggernaut.

Man for man, that team was better than Auburn at almost every position.

I don't think that mummified guy they have coaching can get the most out of it, though.

Hard to say if they have more athletes overall. Easily at the QB position. The guy is a super athlete but isn't any more accurate than Todd with his throws. One thing I think this year is showing us is that we did actually have more athletes last year than first thought but for all the 70 kwazillion reasons rehashed ad nauseum about the clusterfuck that was 08', they never got a chance to show what they could do. I'm in total agreement that you give that team some real corching, they'd be tough to beat by anyone in the country.

Kaos · « **Reply #24 on:** September 20, 2009, 04:58:44 PM »

Quote from: Argo on September 20, 2009, 04:51:14 PM

After watching how physical Tennessee was against the mighty Tebows yesterday, I now think that will be a damn good game.

I've said all along Auburn loses that game because Monte Kiffin will shackle Malzahn this time. Nothing so far to change that opinion.

Crompton is horrible. Florida gifted ten points or they really only score three. As unsteady as our defense is, I still don't think Tennessee can score a lot. If Auburn holds them under 20, that changes the dynamic.

WVU a finesse team? No. They weren't three yard and a cloud of dust mashers, but they were hardly finesse.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #25 on:** September 20, 2009, 05:01:56 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on September 20, 2009, 04:58:44 PM

WVU a finesse team? No. They weren't three yard and a cloud of dust mashers, but they were hardly finesse.

I agree here. WVU was hardly a finesse team. They got open in space, and as for all the tackles we missed, they broke. They ran hard, and played very physical.

Tiger Wench · « **Reply #26 on:** September 20, 2009, 06:06:45 PM »

Quote from: War Eagle!!! on September 20, 2009, 04:28:20 PM

Gutsy play...

Whatever...

Not that I am defending that bammer loser but you should Google Congresswoman Corrine Brown and Gators...

They was some gusty play...

War Eagle!!! · « **Reply #27 on:** September 20, 2009, 06:26:35 PM »

No...that would be gusty play...

The bama fuck was just being a homer...

The Prowler · « **Reply #28 on:** September 20, 2009, 06:38:55 PM »

Quote from: Argo on September 20, 2009, 04:51:14 PM

but when a team can successfully keep pressure on Todd for the better part of the night, I don't think he can handle it.

Kinda like what UWV did last night, with Todd responding with close to 300 yards passing and 4 TDs with only 1 Int?

Argo · « **Reply #29 on:** September 20, 2009, 07:49:38 PM »

Quote from: The Prowler on September 20, 2009, 06:38:55 PM

Kinda like what UWV did last night, with Todd responding with close to 300 yards passing and 4 TDs with only 1 Int?

How many times was Todd sacked last night? Once? If you honestly believe West Virginia kept constant pressure on Todd last night, we definitely have differing opinions on what quarterback pressure is.

Pell City Tiger · « **Reply #30 on:** September 20, 2009, 08:01:47 PM »

How many sacks did bammer have against North Texas School for the Blind and Crippled? None, you say? Wow! Your defensive line sucks.

Argo · « **Reply #31 on:** September 20, 2009, 08:09:44 PM »

Don't play with the matches, strawman. You'll likely catch fire.

Pell City Tiger · « **Reply #32 on:** September 20, 2009, 08:12:22 PM »

Not even 1 sack. Pathetic.

Mean Green! Bwaaaa haa haa haa

Kaos · « **Reply #33 on:** September 20, 2009, 09:00:12 PM »

Quote from: Argo on September 20, 2009, 07:49:38 PM

How many times was Todd sacked last night? Once? If you honestly believe West Virginia kept constant pressure on Todd last night, we definitely have differing opinions on what quarterback pressure is.

Couldn't get to him. Not for lack of trying.

Argo · « **Reply #34 on:** September 20, 2009, 09:12:41 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on September 20, 2009, 09:00:12 PM

Couldn't get to him. Not for lack of trying.

Which is my point. WVU didn't pressure Todd.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #35 on:** September 20, 2009, 09:40:07 PM »

I didn't realize that was the first sack this year...according to the radio broadcast. I don't care who you're playing, that's a much improved line over years past. As it turns out MSU may have a little better D than we thought after the Auburn game. They held Vandy without a 1st down for a long time in that game and pretty much beat the Dores' up.

Saniflush · « **Reply #36 on:** September 20, 2009, 11:10:18 PM »

Quote from: Harvey Birdman on September 20, 2009, 09:40:07 PM

I didn't realize that was the first sack this year...according to the radio broadcast. I don't care who you're playing, that's a much improved line over years past. As it turns out MSU may have a little better D than we thought after the Auburn game. They held Vandy without a 1st down for a long time in that game and pretty much beat the Dores' up.

Where has all this respect for the smart kids come from? They have a couple of decent years for them and now they are a measuring stick?

AUsweetheart · « **Reply #37 on:** September 21, 2009, 12:21:21 AM »

Quote from: Saniflush on September 20, 2009, 11:10:18 PM

Where has all this respect for the smart kids come from?

AUsweetheart · « **Reply #38 on:** September 21, 2009, 12:25:14 AM »

I have no idea why that posted twice, but you get the point.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #39 on:** September 21, 2009, 12:43:27 AM »

Quote from: AUsweetheart on September 21, 2009, 12:25:14 AM

I have no idea why that posted twice, but you get the point.

When posting a YouTube video on this site, you only need to post the actual http:// address.... only.

The site's software recognizes it, and posts the video for you. If you go back and modify your post, and strip off everything but the page's address...you should be fine.