Kickin' it with Coach Chizik....Part II

[Kaos]

It's times like this that I can love you again.

I'm pretty sure based on some previous research I did that the 2004 AU team played much stronger opposition.  That so-called otherworldly 1992 defense averaged almost 10 ppg.  The '04 AU defense allowed just over 11 ppg, but the competition was (to my memory) significantly better.  I don't think they played but two quality teams in '92.  I'll have to go back and dig it up. 

When I write it?  I will post it to the front page.  The bama hacks here will shit their drawers and tell all their friends.  We will be inundated with redneck bastards telling us how ignorant we are.   Word will get out quickly. 

I'll probably get death threats.  Gotten them twice in my life.  Once when I said Alabama was stupid for giving Shula a raise and another when I said NASCAR was idiotic in general and Dale Earnhardt was no hero just because he buzzed around in circles and killed himself. 

You prepared for that? 

[wesfau2]

I'm pretty sure based on some previous research I did that the 2004 AU team played much stronger opposition.  That so-called otherworldly 1992 defense averaged almost 10 ppg.  The '04 AU defense allowed just over 11 ppg, but the competition was (to my memory) significantly better.  I don't think they played but two quality teams in '92.  I'll have to go back and dig it up. 

That team played more top ten opponents than OU and USC combined that year.  Sorry, that's the only stat handy in my brain this morning.  I trust your research will bear out your premise.

You prepared for that? 

I was born ready.  I'm with ya, Leather.

[AUChizad]

That team played more top ten opponents than OU and USC combined that year.  Sorry, that's the only stat handy in my brain this morning.  I trust your research will bear out your premise.


I was born ready.  I'm with ya, Leather.

BUT BUT BUT...they played the Citadel.

Automatic disqualification!

[AWK]

Sounds like a party to me.

[Snaggletiger]

He only coached the best defense, ever, in the history of college football.  All defenses, past, present and future must be measured against it.  No offense ever scored against it.  In fact, it scored most of the points for its own team.  It was so awesome, Kool Aid named a flavor after it.  Michael Jackson wrote a song about it, but it was so touching it made him cry and he could never manage to perform it, thus it has never been heard.  That defense was so awesome that Hitler came back from the grave and surrendered to it so he could save a little dignity. It was so awesome the government tried to purchase it to replace the Hoover Dam.  The Dam plan fell through, though.

Yeah.  He coached that.  I don't have any idea about the awards.

I'm going to do an analysis of that damn team.  That's my mission for the next few days.  It was not that f*cking good and I'm going to prove it.  

I COL'd (Chortled Out Loud)

[RWS]

I'm pretty sure based on some previous research I did that the 2004 AU team played much stronger opposition.  That so-called otherworldly 1992 defense averaged almost 10 ppg.  The '04 AU defense allowed just over 11 ppg, but the competition was (to my memory) significantly better.  I don't think they played but two quality teams in '92.  I'll have to go back and dig it up. 

When I write it?  I will post it to the front page.  The bama hacks here will shit their drawers and tell all their friends.  We will be inundated with redneck bastards telling us how ignorant we are.   Word will get out quickly. 

I'll probably get death threats.  Gotten them twice in my life.  Once when I said Alabama was stupid for giving Shula a raise and another when I said NASCAR was idiotic in general and Dale Earnhardt was no hero just because he buzzed around in circles and killed himself. 

You prepared for that? 

If they give that much of a fuck about a team from 17 years ago, they need to let it go. You can't compare a team from 1992 to a team in 2004. Thats why it annoys me when I go on BOL and see people asking if our '09 defense will be better than the 1992 defense. 17. Fucking. Years. People. Shit, even I wouldn't form an argument if you put up whatever stats to say the 1992 team wasn't all that great.

[Kaos]

If they give that much of a f*ck about a team from 17 years ago, they need to let it go. You can't compare a team from 1992 to a team in 2004. Thats why it annoys me when I go on BOL and see people asking if our '09 defense will be better than the 1992 defense. 17. f*cking. Years. People. sh*t, even I wouldn't form an argument if you put up whatever stats to say the 1992 team wasn't all that great.

BLASPHEMER!!!

It is the team by which all other college football teams must be judged.  And all fall short of the glory.

[GH2001]

BLASPHEMER!!!

It is the team by which all other college football teams must be judged.  And all fall short of the glory.

I's thought dat team wuz reeel gewd. Tha most best eva pimp.

Signed,

Antonio Langham

[Snaggletiger]

I think the one thing about that defense, or better yet, that game...was that I don't think I've ever seen a more glaring endorsement for a playoff system.  Meaning...settle the shit on the field.  Anyone who followed that game recalls how it was a foregone conclusion that Miami, the baddest mofos in the history of college football, would have a double digit cakewalk.  They had the Swagga.  It was a mismatch talent wise of epic proportions.  Hype doesn't prove a damn thing.  The scoreboard does.

Defensively, I'd put our 87' team up there with some of the best evah.  SHOULD have played for the MNC had it not been for one decision to go prevent defense against LSU on the last drive of the game....when they hadn't crossed midfield the entire second half.  If memory serves, Auburn allowed that 1 TD to LSU then promptly ran off 4 straight shut outs after that.

[Kaos]

I's thought dat team wuz reeel gewd. Tha most best eva pimp.

Signed,

Antonio Langham

For the record?  He signed this on a napkin.

[DnATL]

For the record?  He signed this on a napkin.

You know where he got his shoes?