Please, tell me, how exactly beyond a reasonable doubt can the NCAA prove that money was exchanged? Ask the players? Certainly they have nothing to hide either... :eyeroll:
Fine. I'm not talking about the other 179 (although, that's back on the University for letting that many people take advantage and not notice). I'm talking about the 22 who knew full well what they were doing. They were just setting up a UNICEF book program right? Aiding the hungry? Just like all those bar fights where bammer players were playing the Super Hero role and defending the innocent.
Keep barking all day, doggie, you're not convincing anyone.
Well hell, I guess they could have just lied about the whole thing and we wouldn't even be talking about this right now. What would be the use if you're just going to ask people and not do a little digging? I wonder why we're still talking about the Reggie Bush scandal? He SAID he didn't do anything wrong. Hell, lets go ahead and not have trials or court in America anymore. Do you really REALLY think the NCAA doesn't do a little digging beyond asking a student-athlete. Look up a few cases in the NCAA major infractions database. How in the hell they get some of the information they get, I will never know.
Take your orange and blue glasses off for two seconds, and you might be able to be a little rational about it. You're simply pissed off that AU will not be able to glean any advantage from this, and thats all there is to it. I can't think of any other reason why you would be so irrational. Hey, can I go ahead and dismiss some of the stuff the NCAA said in the Albert Means thing? According to you, even if the NCAA says something happened a certain way, its total bullshit. So if you can just imagine and make up the ending to a story, then why can't I? Or is it only OK to make up bullshit that conflicts with what the NCAA investigation found when things don't go your way?
26 Replies
5693 Views