Chizit getting some much deserved recognition

Birmingham · « **on:** April 02, 2009, 08:25:09 PM »

No.87 - Gene Chizik
(5-19 at Iowa State and overall)- When the new Auburn coach was hired few were too happy at Auburn. Chizik was one of the hottest coaching names in the country 3 years ago. He had led top defenses at Texas and Auburn and was thought of by many the way that Will Muschamp is thought of now. He took a tough job at ISU and failed.

Way to crack the top 100 list Eugene!

http://dixiefriedsports.com/Top_100_Coaches_in_NCAA.html

Pell City Tiger · « **Reply #1 on:** April 02, 2009, 08:27:48 PM »

In the words of the immortal Dick Cheney, "Go fuck yourself."

Birmingham · « **Reply #2 on:** April 02, 2009, 08:34:05 PM »

Pell, are you talking to me or the guy who made the list? If you're talking to the guy that made the list than I agree with you, I didn't think Chizit should have made the top 100 either.

Townhallsavoy · « **Reply #3 on:** April 02, 2009, 09:41:58 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on April 02, 2009, 08:34:05 PM

Pell, are you talking to me or the guy who made the list? If you're talking to the guy that made the list than I agree with you, I didn't think Chizit should have made the top 100 either.

Alllllmost well played. But...

Ranger12 · « **Reply #4 on:** April 02, 2009, 11:29:00 PM »

Taking a break from your live action World of Warcraft role playing basement party I see.

stewiegriffin · « **Reply #5 on:** April 03, 2009, 08:29:45 AM »

Quote from: Birmingham on April 02, 2009, 08:25:09 PM

No.87 - Gene Chizik
(5-19 at Iowa State and overall)- When the new Auburn coach was hired few were too happy at Auburn. Chizik was one of the hottest coaching names in the country 3 years ago. He had led top defenses at Texas and Auburn and was thought of by many the way that Will Muschamp is thought of now. He took a tough job at ISU and failed.

Way to crack the top 100 list Eugene!

http://dixiefriedsports.com/Top_100_Coaches_in_NCAA.html

blah, blah, blah-blah-blah, You top the list of bammer quefe eaters

Birmingham · « **Reply #6 on:** April 03, 2009, 02:01:34 PM »

I saw no evidence that seemed to indicate that the writer of this article was either bammer or quefe eater. I think you guys are being a little hard on him. So he messed up and put Chizit on the list. Let's not crucify the guy.

RWS · « **Reply #7 on:** April 03, 2009, 02:03:56 PM »

Hey, I thought this guy was going to be stiff opposition to Saban on the recruiting trail as well....?

JR4AU · « **Reply #8 on:** April 03, 2009, 02:17:12 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on April 03, 2009, 02:01:34 PM

I saw no evidence that seemed to indicate that the writer of this article was either bammer or quefe eater. I think you guys are being a little hard on him. So he messed up and put Chizit on the list. Let's not crucify the guy.

I think your dumbass knows they're talking to YOU...fuckstick!

CCTAU · « **Reply #9 on:** April 03, 2009, 02:28:49 PM »

Remember...1 for 7 does not a dynasty make.

RWS · « **Reply #10 on:** April 03, 2009, 03:10:57 PM »

Quote from: CCTAU on April 03, 2009, 02:28:49 PM

Remember...1 for 7 does not a dynasty make.

Perhaps, but apparently 5 for 19 makes a winner.

Wow. Seriously? It makes our "Got ______?" shirts sound normal.

Buzz Killington · « **Reply #11 on:** April 03, 2009, 03:32:45 PM »

Quote from: runswithscissors on April 03, 2009, 03:10:57 PM

Wow. Seriously? It makes our "Got ______?" shirts sound normal.

Yes, it does...scary huh?
I have a case on back-order though.

JR4AU · « **Reply #12 on:** April 03, 2009, 04:16:49 PM »

Quote from: runswithscissors on April 03, 2009, 03:10:57 PM

Perhaps, but apparently 5 for 19 makes a winner.

Wow. Seriously? It makes our "Got ______?" shirts sound normal.

You fucking "savior" coach was a .500 coach for 4 straight years at Mich St. ISU is a lifetime sub .500 program. Nobody wins there you stupid fuckstick.

RWS · « **Reply #13 on:** April 03, 2009, 05:03:18 PM »

Quote from: JR4AU on April 03, 2009, 04:16:49 PM

You fucking "savior" coach was a .500 coach for 4 straight years at Mich St. ISU is a lifetime sub .500 program. Nobody wins there you stupid fuckstick.

At least our "savior" had a MNC and a few SECCGs under his belt as a head coach. That kind of answers the whole "Is it just Michigan St., or is it a bad coach?" question. I also feel that I should inform you that CNS never went .500 for 4 straight years at Michigan St.

1995: 6-5-1
1996: 6-6
1997: 7-5
1998: 6-6
1999: 9-2

He was also 9-2 as a HC at Toledo.

btw, ISU is not a lifetime sub .500 program. For example, the past 9 seasons, 5 of them have been .500 or better. They were 9-3 in 2000. So, in the past 8 seasons, 55% have been .500 or better. They made 5 bowl appearances as well. Also, "The Winning Gene" was responsible for two of the four losing seasons. I'm glad I could clear this up for you.

Greaseyweasel · « **Reply #14 on:** April 03, 2009, 08:31:34 PM »

Some of the other members of thw great Auburn Family cannot accept the facts and truths related to the person currently sitting in the coaches chair.
(are you happy? I didn't call him a fuckhead one single time since I got whined at about the truth.)

The Prowler · « **Reply #15 on:** April 03, 2009, 08:38:04 PM »

Quote from: Greaseyweasel on April 03, 2009, 08:31:34 PM

Some of the other members of thw great Auburn Family cannot accept the facts and truths related to the person currently sitting in the coaches chair.
(are you happy? I didn't call him a fuckhead one single time since I got whined at about the truth.)

keep up the good work, greasey. RTR

RWS · « **Reply #16 on:** April 03, 2009, 10:25:15 PM »

Quote from: The Prowler on April 03, 2009, 08:38:04 PM

keep up the good work, greasey. RTR

I certainly didn't see you piping up to dispute what was said.

Ranger12 · « **Reply #17 on:** April 04, 2009, 01:22:38 AM »

Greasy, you just keep making yourself look more and more like a Turd. I am going to start calling you "Lassie" because you act like such a bitch.

JR4AU · « **Reply #18 on:** April 04, 2009, 02:21:43 PM »

Quote from: runswithscissors on April 03, 2009, 05:03:18 PM

At least our "savior" had a MNC and a few SECCGs under his belt as a head coach. That kind of answers the whole "Is it just Michigan St., or is it a bad coach?" question. I also feel that I should inform you that CNS never went .500 for 4 straight years at Michigan St.

1995: 6-5-1
1996: 6-6
1997: 7-5
1998: 6-6
1999: 9-2

He was also 9-2 as a HC at Toledo.

btw, ISU is not a lifetime sub .500 program. For example, the past 9 seasons, 5 of them have been .500 or better. They were 9-3 in 2000. So, in the past 8 seasons, 55% have been .500 or better. They made 5 bowl appearances as well. Also, "The Winning Gene" was responsible for two of the four losing seasons. I'm glad I could clear this up for you.

Scuse me! .520 his first 4 seasons at MSU. Then 9 wins, and poof, gone like a fart in the wind. And yes, ISU is lifetime sub .500 in football. 476-556-46. That's sub .500 with any math you use, except may bammer math. It's a loser program.

RWS · « **Reply #19 on:** April 04, 2009, 07:38:47 PM »

Quote from: JR4AU on April 04, 2009, 02:21:43 PM

Scuse me! .520 his first 4 seasons at MSU. Then 9 wins, and poof, gone like a fart in the wind. And yes, ISU is lifetime sub .500 in football. 476-556-46. That's sub .500 with any math you use, except may bammer math. It's a loser program.

Wow, when you have to go all the way back to 1892 to try and prove a point about your coach.....thats sad. I was trying to use a little more current data, but whatever. Also, when you said "lifetime sub .500", I assumed you meant no coach ever got over a .500 record because saying the program itself is sub .500 since its inception is kind of a weird argument to use, since there are obviously other coaches that have coached there and had success.