It was someone from the Big Ten for starters, it didn't happen in the SEC the only conference that matters to me, but since you won't leave it alone, let me explain something to you. One of my best friends is a Maize and Blue guy. We watch a lot of Big-10 games b/c of him. We have to in order to keep him form bitching. How many Big-10 games do you watch? Levi Brown, Jake Long and Dan Mozes (Big East) were just as good, if not better. Now in 06 Bert Bielema was in his first year as HC at Wisc. He took them to a top 10 ranking, around 6 I think, Wisc was getting a lot of media attention, Mich was too, but not near as much as Wisc was. It was a great story, Alvarez retires, his coordinator takes over and has a phenomenal season. WVU well they were good, top 20 or so but not the best, do you think media coverage had anything to do with it? Just like this year. UA got a lot of media coverage. But of course that had nothing to do with it at all did it? Media coverage never influences anything, ever! So yeah, I can make that argument if you would like for me too.
So do you not want to answer the question Kaos put forward? How does one win the top lineman of the year award but yet, his own conference coaches doesn't think he is the best? I know, all reporters/sports writers are smarter than any coaches who have viewed hours worth of film and coach against and with these guys, right? Which goes right along with what Kaos has been saying all along, just FURTHER proof that post season awards are garbage.
EDIT: Trust me, I drank many of beers on Saturdays listening to how good Long was and why Mich deserved to replay OSU for the title that year.