Anybody surprised?

[CCTAU]

I saw a meme this morning where someone asked why the SS did not have someone on that roof. The reply was no need to have the SS and the CIA on the same roof!

[GH2001]

Shooter was in an ad for Blackrock filmed at his high school last year.

https://x.com/lauraloomer/status/1812416983201112373?s=46

We’ve seen this before. Lee Harvey something or another. Just saying.

It's called a young, dumb patsy being amped up by "others".

[Kaos]

Ol Wessie is pretty quiet here.

[wesfau2]

Ol Wessie is pretty quiet here.

Not sure what you want.  Is shooting people bad?  Yes.  I'm glad the republicans are finally open to that concept.

Otherwise, a Republican shot the Republican candidate using the Republicans' favorite protected firearm. In response to the non-stop stream of rhetoric out of the Republican candidate's mouth.

I'm good.  Y'all can be mad at each other.

[Kaos]

Not sure what you want.  Is shooting people bad?  Yes.  I'm glad the republicans are finally open to that concept.

Otherwise, a Republican shot the Republican candidate using the Republicans' favorite protected firearm. In response to the non-stop stream of rhetoric out of the Republican candidate's mouth.

I'm good.  Y'all can be mad at each other.

You, sir, have completely lost your mind. 


Whoopi Goldberg is staring at you, agog. 

[wesfau2]

You, sir, have completely lost your mind. 


Whoopi Goldberg is staring at you, agog.

None of that is disputable.  If you continue to do so, I'm confirmed that you are detached from reality.  Again.

[Kaos]

None of that is disputable.  If you continue to do so, I'm confirmed that you are detached from reality.  Again.

Every word of it is disputable. 

Every word of it is despicable. 

I feel sorry for you. 

[chinook]

Not sure what you want.  Is shooting people bad?  Yes.  I'm glad the republicans are finally open to that concept.

Otherwise, a Republican shot the Republican candidate using the Republicans' favorite protected firearm. In response to the non-stop stream of rhetoric out of the Republican candidate's mouth.

I'm good.  Y'all can be mad at each other.

the comment about Republicans open to shooting people is bad.
really wes? ...that's stirring the pot. 

any plausible merit he registered as a republican to vote in a primary to hopefully change the outcome.  democrat operative? antifa operative?

he was too young to vote in the last presidential race so really no basis to say he was tied to any party.

many, many democrats support the 2A and own guns, and yes an AR-15.

rhetoric, oh ok and the democrats aren't doing the same?   shit dude.
 

[wesfau2]

the comment about Republicans open to shooting people is bad.
really wes? ...that's stirring the pot. 

any plausible merit he registered as a republican to vote in a primary to hopefully change the outcome.  democrat operative? antifa operative?

he was too young to vote in the last presidential race so really no basis to say he was tied to any party.

many, many democrats support the 2A and own guns, and yes an AR-15.

rhetoric, oh ok and the democrats aren't doing the same?   shit dude.

I defy you to find any shoot/kill rhetoric from anyone approaching the mainstream left.  It ain't there.

But there's a metric fuck ton of it from the repub crew.

[WiregrassTiger]

None of that is disputable.  If you continue to do so, I'm confirmed that you are detached from reality.  Again.

Look, I’m just going to shoot it to you straight. So, it will undoubtedly be over your head. But you and I can’t see eye to eye.

I mean, I’m 6 foot in my cleats.

Snags thinks he’s 6’ 4”. He’s the only one who thinks that but he still towers over you.

My point is that you are pretty low.

And any comments about the constitutionally protected firearm is unwarranted.

I don’t doubt that you wish the little punk would not have missed but you have better sense than to say that. I realize that. Or, at least I haven’t heard you say it but you would need to be jumping up and down.

My main concern since Trump’s ear getting grazed is you and Stephen not getting into it. I’ve never pretended to be butt buddies with you and he and I aren’t exactly what I would describe as close. But I feel obligated to keep him from getting the fuck beaten out of him.

I will admit that since he blocked me that time, I don’t have anything for the motherfucker. But, I do have something for his wife.

So, I am watching. I don’t want to get on here and talk a bunch of shit like most of these motherfuckers. I let my Uncle Ricky and cousin Louie do the talking and it’s in a language that you will understand, no matter what you speak.

[AUJarhead]

I defy you to find any shoot/kill rhetoric from anyone approaching the mainstream left.  It ain't there.

But there's a metric fuck ton of it from the repub crew.

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1812325538620420349?s=46&t=zqQHVa85lEP9M2LY6roGEQ

But what do I know, according to President Biden, I’m a threat to democracy.

[chinook]

I defy you to find any shoot/kill rhetoric from anyone approaching the mainstream left.  It ain't there.

But there's a metric fuck ton of it from the repub crew.

you're moving the goalposts now...clearly you stated rhetoric, now your covering yourself by shoot/kill rhetoric. 

which is it, wes? 

[wesfau2]

you're moving the goalposts now...clearly you stated rhetoric, now your covering yourself by shoot/kill rhetoric. 

which is it, wes?

It's shoot/kill rhetoric.  It's suggesting that Hillary needed a "2nd amendment solution."  It's the Republican gubernatorial candidate saying "some people need to be killed."

I'll take lumps on Jar's video, but there is a gulf between the two parties on this issue.

[War Damn Six]

How about Joe saying Trump and bullseye in the same sentence?

[Kaos]

It's shoot/kill rhetoric.  It's suggesting that Hillary needed a "2nd amendment solution."  It's the Republican gubernatorial candidate saying "some people need to be killed."

I'll take lumps on Jar's video, but there is a gulf between the two parties on this issue.

You are deranged.  I pity you. 

All you’re doing is protecting what the left actually does on what you wish the right would do. 

Yeah. There’s a gulf.  But it’s not what you think.   

[AUJarhead]

It's shoot/kill rhetoric.  It's suggesting that Hillary needed a "2nd amendment solution."  It's the Republican gubernatorial candidate saying "some people need to be killed."

I'll take lumps on Jar's video, but there is a gulf between the two parties on this issue.

You're a good man, Wes.

[Snakebite]

You're a good man, Wes.

Hoping that as the popularity of the radical left continues to fall off, their media’s talking points will change to be more moderate to stay in business. When that happens, I’m sure others will follow along. That’s the trend I am seeing. There’s hope yet. Politics as a religion needs to be put in the rear view.

[jmar]

Hoping that as the popularity of the radical left continues to fall off, their media’s talking points will change to be more moderate to stay in business. When that happens, I’m sure others will follow along. That’s the trend I am seeing. There’s hope yet. Politics as a religion needs to be put in the rear view.

What about cults?
I'm a practicing Trumpist and your little description here cramps my style.
 

[Snakebite]

What about cults?
I'm a practicing Trumpist and your little description here cramps my style.

I don’t want to offend a man that drinks raw chicken cocktails. Forgive me!

[Snaggletiger]

Hoping that as the popularity of the radical left continues to fall off, their media’s talking points will change to be more moderate to stay in business. When that happens, I’m sure others will follow along. That’s the trend I am seeing. There’s hope yet. Politics as a religion needs to be put in the rear view.

Agree wholeheartedly.  It needs to happen all the way around, and soon.

However, the media can’t do it.  They just can’t.  Here’s an example.  I started seeing posts on the medias that are social from people, a lot of which are teh gays, about how their lives are pretty much over if Trump gets in and adopts Project 2025.  What is Project 2025?  It’s set of “guidelines” laid out by The Heritage Foundation, a self-proclaimed, Conservative think-tank, that basically say, if we’re going to take our country back, we have to…..well, 900+ pages of we have to.

They can call themselves conservative, but a lot of that shit is exactly what should be labeled, radical right wing garbage.  Stuff that will never happen, and some of it, flat out unconstitutional.  There are some former Trump staffers in Heritage Foundation, so naturally, the media ties it to Trump, and when that happens, the lemmings automatically scream bloody murder and how he is going to ban abortion nationwide, and put all the trans people in jail.  BTW, I’m not exaggerating.  I’ve seen very serious posts to that effect.

So, what does Trump have to say about Project 2025? "I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal,” Trump wrote earlier this month. “Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

 I’m sure Trump has been involved with them at some point.  Probably praised their members, stood on a podium somewhere with some of them, arm in arm, saying how hugely good they are.  I have no idea.  But, 2025 is some new, radical shit, and he can’t be any clearer about where he stands.  But, that doesn’t stop our 90% radical left-leaning media.  Do yourself one favor.  Google “Trump’s stance on Project 2025.” You only have to glance at the headlines.  All the usual suspects are there.  CNN, NBC, NPR, CNBC etc.  Every one saying the same thing. Trump tries  to distance himself from Project 2025….BUT…..he didn’t say no, did he?

And you wonder how people can spread the word on social media about how Trump is going to kill all the gays?