Question for Jarbuzz, since you guys are the only ones ever in here. So we're 40+ games into this shortened season. Well, everyone except the sickly Cards. What do you think about the rules changes implemented for this shortened season. Am I right in understanding they're experimental? There are others, but basically, the big changes are:
Designated hitters in the NL
Any pitcher who comes in the game must face a minimum of 3 batters
7 inning games in double headers
Every extra inning begins with a runner on second.
I'll step out there and say I love every one of them.
DH in the NL: I've been an advocate of that for years. Even though the numbers don't bear it out so far in this shortened season, I think in the long run, another legit bat in the line up has to add more excitement to the game. Honestly, I don't want to see your two worst batters in the 7 and 8 spots, and then a pitcher who is 2 for 47 come to the plate.
3 Batter Minimum: No brainer here. Critics of the game and its snail's pace, have ripped the practice of bringing in a pitcher to face one batter. Then doing it again, and again, and again. It just brings the game to standstill.
7 inning double headers and the runner on second: Baseball purists may have a legit gripe with putting a runner on 2nd to start an inning, but I'm fine with it. I can live with that change to stop games from drawing out 5 1/2 hours til 2:00 in the morning.
Most of these rules are to speed the game up and add some excitement and hopefully attract a younger demographic. I'd even consider implementing a pitch clock. Get the damn sign and throw the ball. And Mr. Batter, get your ass in the box and hit. I don't want to watch you step out after every pitch, undo both batting gloves and re-strap them, take three practice swings, hold your hand up to the ump for time while you dig back in....
Please opine.