I've thought about this and had more discussions about it, and I have changed my stance....see peoples minds can change.
First I like Snags delved into the Title IX requirements. I can find no instance of Domestic Abuse being involved in any Title IX requirements. Now there is a discussion of sexual abuse, however, this also deals strictly with athletes themselves or female students. So now I'm not understanding why Urban would be required to report anything, unless there is something specifically in his contract and I'm not looking through that. To me this changes things a ton. If he isn't required to report things, then he has no obligation to anyone.
Secondly, I still think the guy is a complete piece of shit for beating his wife. However, I kept thinking about this as if the people in the situation had no alternate decisions and they all did.
I'm not blaming her at all. However, even as a victim, she had a decision. After the 2009 incident, she chose to stay with the sob. That was her decision. Why was it Urban Meyer's responsibility to fire him? He was never charged.
What would the end result of Meyer firing him be?
Again, I'm not saying she was responsible....AT ALL. Again I just wonder what firing him would have solved.
For my own morality if I was boss I would like to think that I would fire an employee who beat his wife. Then I thought well what if that employee was my best friend. It isn't the same. CCTAU and Kaos you guys are right, not that there necessarily is a wrong or right, in this situation.
Firing Kevin Smith would not have stopped him from beating his wife. What is the end game? $$$$$$$?
So if they fire Meyer you have a loss of a program, college athletes who came for Meyer, numerous people who no longer have a job. Because of the decisions made by 2 individuals. A guy that beat up his wife and a wife that chose to stay.