Back on the opinion for a second. Although I agree that the part Wes posted focused on the hostility of the Commission during what was supposed to be a fair and unbiased hearing, I think it also hits directly at the crux of the issue. The Justices got a glimpse of how religion is treated in certain areas in our current environment. I'm assuming that Phillips is sincere in his assertion that his religious beliefs precluded him from baking teh gay cakes. It also appears that up until the SCOTUS took a look at it, his religious beliefs were dismissed as balderdash...shenanigans even...and he was not allowed to take a position based on his faith. I believe (Just my opinion)the SCOTUS saw in the extremely biased language of the Commission's decision, and that it was never challenged, that Phillips was in fact, the one discriminated against.