This is obviously hugely disappointing.
The article said he was "producing child pornography with intent to distribute". If true, fuck him to hell and back.
The only details I read in the release said it involved filming a kid pee with his cell phone in a restaurant. I'm not knee-jerk defending him, but the specifics on this are sparse enough at this point that I can't entirely rule out that there was some sort of innocent explanation. Maybe the kid was peeing with his pants around his ankles or something and he was filming it to text to one of his buddies as a joke making fun of the kid?
Maybe I just don't want to believe Brad Lester beats off to videos of kids peeing, but maybe he does.