Things I don't like about Trump

[CCTAU]

Funny, I've yet to see much of that.

Well, you aren't very bright. So that is to be expected.

[The Prowler]

Well, you aren't very bright. So that is to be expected.

^Says a Trump supporter^ 

[CCTAU]

^Says a Trump supporter^ 

I've seeen this type of response before.


It's usually from a butthurt snowflake!


Until Trump does something I did not elect him for, I will support him.


Winning!

[GH2001]

I've seeen this type of response before.


It's usually from a butthurt snowflake!


Until Trump does something I did not elect him for, I will support him.


Winning!

And funny coming from a supporter of a guy like Bernie who has a majority of his support from college kids and hippies. Real high end crowd there.

[War Eagle!!!]

I'll surely regret this, but mind fleshing out identifying any policy that Trump is pushing that is "striking blows for the blue collar base?"

I would think the focusing on blue collar, factory jobs would suffice to meet this request. There has been quite a number of companies committed to keeping manufacturing here in the US, or bringing manufacturing back to the US since Trump was elected.

Also, Trump's dealing with NATO may not be striking blows exactly "for" the blue-collar workers, but it is a position that works inline with what blue-collar workers stand for.

[The Prowler]

I would think the focusing on blue collar, factory jobs would suffice to meet this request. There has been quite a number of companies committed to keeping manufacturing here in the US, or bringing manufacturing back to the US since Trump was elected.

You mean like Carrier?

[wesfau2]

I would think the focusing on blue collar, factory jobs would suffice to meet this request. There has been quite a number of companies committed to keeping manufacturing here in the US, or bringing manufacturing back to the US since Trump was elected.

I'm willing to hear this argument, can you point out specifics for me?

Also, Trump's dealing with NATO may not be striking blows exactly "for" the blue-collar workers, but it is a position that works inline with what blue-collar workers stand for.

I think this is closer to being correct, but mostly in a "they don't understand it, so attack it" sense.

[Kaos]

I'm willing to hear this argument, can you point out specifics for me?

I think this is closer to being correct, but mostly in a "they don't understand it, so attack it" sense.

I know you're not a raging asshole, but the arrogance that drips from your response is egregious.

[WiregrassTiger]

I know you're not a raging asshole, but the arrogance that drips from your response is egregious.

Have you never met Wes?

[AUChizad]

I know you're not a raging asshole, but the arrogance that drips from your response is egregious.

Asking someone to defend and clarify their political positions in the political forum "egregiously" "drips arrogance"?

This doesn't speak well of your convictions. Go ahead and tell me that's arrogant of me.

That said, War Eagle is capable of nuance that you're not, and wes's post was directed at him, so please pipe down while the adults are talking.

[Kaos]

Asking someone to defend and clarify their political positions in the political forum "egregiously" "drips arrogance"?

This doesn't speak well of your convictions. Go ahead and tell me that's arrogant of me.

That said, War Eagle is capable of nuance that you're not, and wes's post was directed at him, so please pipe down while the adults are talking.

Ahhhh... go make sweet love to a goat.  Kind of ironic for the king of the blundering hammer to be lecturing anyone on "nuance." 

It wasn't asking someone to defend nor clarify. 

The "I'm willing to hear this argument"  statement is patronizing and arrogant.  It essentially says "I am right, but I will entertain your stupidity long enough to show you why you're wrong." 

The second statement was patronizing in general toward anyone not considered as genteel as W.  It essentially says "all of those people are stupid and don't understand their position.  If I could just educate them, they would be so much better off." 

And I wasn't talking to YOU anyways.   

[GH2001]

Asking someone to defend and clarify their political positions in the political forum "egregiously" "drips arrogance"?

This doesn't speak well of your convictions. Go ahead and tell me that's arrogant of me.

That said, War Eagle is capable of nuance that you're not, and wes's post was directed at him, so please pipe down while the adults are talking.

I think he may have meant the "blue collar average joe trump voters don't understand any foreign policy so just attack" line.

[WiregrassTiger]

I usually agree with Kaos but saying that Wes is not a raging asshole is taking things a bit far.