I understand that Spring games are glorified scrimmages and rarely have any bearing on what a team will do in the Fall. However, there was one thing I took from this year's game that might sound like balderdash and bordering on shenanigans. I think this could turn out to be the most potent offense Malzahn has ever had. No need to break it all down. Just suffice it to say that I can't recall a time when he had this many playmakers at his disposal. Regardless if that's truly the case or not, they'll light up the scoreboard like always.
So what's the difference between being one of the last 4 standing or 9-4/8-5? Will Muschamp. Really, Captain Obvious? Figure that out all by yerself, didja? Yes I did. But looking at some basic defensive stats tells you all you need to know. And the fact is, if we could get even close to some Tuberville-esque defensive numbers, the only question will be who the other 3 teams will be in the playoff. First, the good ole days (Of defense) in points allowed and yards allowed:
2004 11.3 360.9
2005 15.5 315.2
2006 13.9 292.3
2007 16.9 297
2008 18.0 317
Despite making the MNC twice and winning it once, here are the post CTT defensive numbers:
2009 27.5 374
2010 24.1 368
2011 28.9 408
2012 28.3 420.5
2013 24.7 420.7
2014 26.6 398
Last year's numbers were really far worse when it counted. They did play some good D in the first few games all the way through K-State, but after that, it got ugly. Real ugly. Watching AU under CTT was sometimes frustrating because you always thought they could have opened it up more and blown more teams away. But no matter what, you could always count on a rock solid D, even in his worst year, 2008.
Can anyone explain the difference? We've always recruited well, certainly good enough to be more competitive on that side of the ball than we have been. Was it just Tuberville's philosophy and schemes, because he went through a lot of coordinators in his tenure at AU and the D was always there. Can CWM get this unit to get the PPG under 20? If he can.....