Only comparing in re to asst coaches covering their flaws.
Believe me, I want him to stay there. But with the talent and resources he's had, UGA should have a natty or two by now. Underachiever. The assts in the past weren't the issue for UGA. And the ones going forward won't solve it either. UGA should be like Texas or USC in theory. A half retarded gorilla should be able to go to any of those schools and win 6-7 games. He's just no one that invokes fear and making a couple of decent hires doesn't change that. Especially when the guy in charge of their D was just carved up by Gus.
You know as well as I do that team talent (AU 2004) and coaching (AU 2010) are not only what it takes to get to the MNC so to say he should have 2 is stretching it. Should he have 1 yes, I think so. Would I want him as our head coach...depends on when you asked. Right now...no. Tuberville was a great coach and he also didn't have any MNC's.
To use him as your example in this case is stupid, IMO. I don't think his assistants cover up deficiencies, assistants are crucial to any team. Making the right hires that fit your team mold are just as important. Even though I don't care for him I personally think Richt is a great coach. He constantly has his team in the hunt, and what more could you want as a fan?
BTW Richt is 8-5 against us.
The other point you made which I have heard media members make is also immaterial. That you should be able to hire anyone when talking about a certain team or geography. When has that ever held true? Name me one example of that happening. USC was good back in the day and had fallen off the map until Pete Carrol got there. Texas hadn't done shit after Darrell Royal until Mack Brown. Ask bama how life had been after Bahr until thy Führer got there. You need a good coach to coach a good team, it's how it works.