You mean like a Bo Jackson type speech impediment? Like the way they mock him all the time on goober's show even now?
No. Not like that.
You know as well as I do that Bo's speech impediment is not in the same stratosphere as speech being impeded by a deadly, crippling disease. At least I hope you do.
Because the people who run the station and make the decisions decided they didn't like what they did and decided to exercise their right to run them out of their business. This isn't Russia, Danny. Is this Russia? This isn't Russia.
I used to listen to these guys in the mornings when I lived in Atlanta, honestly the people who fired them probably did the people in Atlanta a favor. They were good sports guys, but since it was a morning show they kept trying to do comedy bits which often ended up with periods of awkward silence. They finally did a bit that was both awkward and offensive and got run out of town.
Exactly.
I'm not seeing what's so hard to understand here. This isn't a first amendment issue. This is a business decision.
If they were thrown in jail for this, I'd be on the front line defending their right to a terrible sense of humor.
No one wants to hear people maliciously mocking someone with ALS, saying "Smother me, do me a favor", etc. That's not lighthearted. It's just mean and nasty. Like I said, if there was anything that could be considered funny in there, maybe it would be excusable. What was the point of this? People, naturally, called the station in droves expressing how tasteless and inexcusable the "bit" was. The station did what any responsible business would and should do by firing the offenders whom made virtually their entire customer base uncomfortable at best, outraged at worst.
I honestly don't see what redeeming quality there is to defend here.