Ummm yeah, I know the game of football fucking retard. If you didn't see Holland improve (this goes for everyone else) then you're so far removed from being â€realistic†and clearly don't have a fucking clue about what you're looking at. I don't expect you to understand, your bicycle helmet (with stickers all over it) probably kept getting into your view and since we played a game, you just assume Jake Holland didn't do anything but play paddy cake back there with the Safeties. You (along with anyone else that thinks Holland didn't improve) really needs to sleep on it, rewatch the game, realistically watch #5 the whole game. Then come back and post what you saw.
If you (Yoda) say that you don't need to rewatch it, well then I can't help ya, you'll just go through the rest of weekend posting like a moron.
The only one posting like a moron is you. No I don't need to watch the game again because I watched the entire game by myself, no interruptions, didn't drink a drop and understand the game of football.
I did see improvement. I saw a freshman safety given a chance to play, make an outstanding play on the BALL in the endzone and break up a TD. I also saw a defense that played with heart lay it on the line. The secondary was aggressive against the run, although we still don't completely understand the concept of wrapping up when tackling. The D ends played great as was expected from the 2 best defensive players. The most improvement came from the D tackles, who actually fought off blocks and attacked the ball. The play from the tackles slowed down the run and allowed linebackers and secondary to also attack. I understand where a novice to the game would mistakenly take that as improved play out of #5. But that is dead wrong. #5 is slow to read and react to the play and his cover skills are suspect at best. An improvement from #5 would be filling the whole 2-3 yards off the line not 5-7. It would include taking ons block and standing ground to at least force the run a different direction, not getting pounded. #5 did play hard ill give you that, but he simply does not cut it as a MLB in the SEC. #5 missed numerous plays last night attributed to being blocked out, not reacting or not having the confidence to cream a QB standing in the pocket.
Why is it that your so called analysis is so much better than anyone else's?
Why did you not need to watch the game a second time to check your own thoughts?
To me that is pretty damn hypocritical when you don't even know someone, what their background is, or how they base his/her opinion.
Also, just curious have you ever played the game, at any level?