Pretty much.
I think it's easy to be "tolerant" (in the left's definition of the word) when it's on a small scale. "People like chopping off their dicks to become women? Well, they aren't bothering anybody, right? There's only 500 of them? Who cares what they do?"
But doesn't the conversation change if the number was higher? What if the majority of Americans acted that way? Are you still "tolerant" as the minority? Wouldn't you rather live some place that featured more people like you?
If so, why is it wrong to speak out against it or simply just not for it when it is still a minuscule number of people?
The conversation changes for me when my views aren't given representation.
If my daughter's teacher used to be a man and is now "Betty" and I don't object I've given defacto acceptance to something I disagree with. It's an aberrant lifestyle and it not one I want represented to my children as "just another choice."
Same with gays, goat fuckers, bigamists, Muslims or whatever.
If you want to lay the pipe to an orangutan in your home and you aren't violating any laws, I don't care.
If you want to stand up and demand that all orangutan fuckers should be given special treatment (often defined as "equal") then you've stepped into my space and I should have the right to tell you to keep it down home.