There are exceptions to everything. For example, you are the exception to a rational adult who understands how to admit they are wrong.
Regardless, you made a broad statement claiming you can't deduct wages and that "everything is deductible." (in an attempt to troll and cover for you being wrong) I proved you wrong, stated that you can deduct employees wages and also said that not everything is deductible. You got butt hurt for being called out and being wrong. You change your argument, mid-argument, after realizing you are outright wrong. You clamp onto a minor thing like the exemptions I listed for you, that do not apply to your situation, or really any situation for that matter. You blindly claim victory over an argument that never would have existed but for your stubbornness and being wrong...
I just listed your M.O. in paragraph. Wait, I forgot to add that you must hate everything that anyone else likes, unless you found it first.
There. The definition of troll Kaos. Everyone enjoy, and feel free to refer to this post anytime Kaos starts an argument or voices his opinion. It will save a lot of time. Just post: Troll Kaos likes to troll.
Since time is money I tried to deduct the time spent in this thread. My accountant laughed.
I made no "broad statement." I said "unless you can't." By definition "as a general rule" means there are exceptions (things you can't do). Therefore "unless you can't" applies.
I'm not and never have been wrong in relation to the simplistic examples set forth in this thread and others. As stated numerous times if money in - money out = money in bank (for tax P&L purposes) there would be no need for accountants, tax lawyers, fee mongers or the IRS. Since those things (except fee mongers, perhaps) are all realities it just isn't that simple.
If you have a business that requires a great deal of travel you should know that there are myriad rules and regulations that impact what is allowable and what isn't. There are percentages, etc. So while in the course of travel my employee might spend $180 on travel expenses the IRS may only allow me to deduct $140 based on the regulations (this is a GD example, don't get your calculator out and explain the percentages because that's irrelevant, the fact that the exist is enough). If I am being reimbursed for expenses (as the owner I generally don't reimburse myself) what I might be reimbursed for may be a different amount than the IRS allows to be claimed.
Yes, I made broad statements previously. But my contention remains that the paper "profit" used by the IRS to calculate your taxes does not necessarily correlate with the actual amount of cash on hand. I've had years early on where I "showed" a loss but had plenty of available cash. I've had other years where I "showed" a substantial profit but had nowhere near that amount of available funds. It's a fucking shell game. You roll this to there, defer that to here, amortize that to whereever, blah blah fucking blah.
And you know it.
You proved nothing except an inability to take a joke. The "everything is deductible" shit is no different to me than Kirby vaccuums, tomatoes or face painting. The rest is just wind twisting