So there is a poll on the front page of Yahoo. It is the perfect example of how polls are set up to skew the results.
The poll asks:
Is the George Zimmerman charge just?
A. Yes, 2nd-degree murder is right.
B. No, It's too harsh.
C. No, It's too lenient.
Seems fine on the surface. But where is "D. No. This is all bullshit" option?
So it really doesn't matter how you answer this poll. IF you answer at all, you have already agreed that he should be charged.
So you think it's all just made up? No murder occurred? Trayvon's just sitting at his house laughing at this whole thing?
Most sane people can at least recognize that shit went down and it's not "all bullshit." The debate is whether Zimmerman was justified in shooting Trayvon to death via legitimate self-defense, or if he was the provoker that brought the conflict on himself. If you believe the former, then you believe the punishment "is too harsh". If you believe the latter, then you believe "Yes, 2nd degree murder is right." If you buy into Al Sharpton's bullshit, you believe "it's too lenient".
There is no debate over it being "all bullshit". Someone was killed.
It's funny how some of you have shifted your key positions, and yet maintain this facade of objectivity. So before, the law of the land was infallible. If he hadn't been charged, then
obviously he was innocent. If they had evidence proving his guilt, then charges would have already been filed.
Now that they have? Oh, the corruption! This whole thing's a sham, and they're just playing to special interests.