A lot of it is youth, but when you have a lot of youth on Defensive plays should be called that takes decisions out of their hands, also I'm not a fan of our CBs playing off the WRs 10 yards.
For everyone that doesn't think Youth and lack of playing experience all over the Defense isn't a huge part of the issue, then y'all need to get a clue...or just go to every message and maybe call into radio shows kicking and screaming, that'll defintely help.
Yes, youth and inexperience factor in. Youth and inexperience, if they're talented, and half assed coached, can play good D, but will make a mistake or 2 resulting in big plays.
Youth and inexperience, if they're well coached playing with an aggressive philosophy will make some plays here and there, and don't get run through like a sieve over and over and over and over. They don't miss tackle after tackle. They don't get pushed around every stinking play. They don't run down the field covering receivers, never turning to look for the ball, resulting in a ball doinking off your back numbers for what should be a pick. Defense, well coached defense with a speck of talent is the easiest part of the game to get good at. Not great, it takes work, coaching and experience to get great, but if you're aggressive, play hard and fast, you can play decent defense with minimal mistakes. And you can't convince me that we are so lacking in talent that after facing 1 bottom dweller, and 2 teams that would be, at best mid level SEC teams, that we have a defense that after today will likely be the worst in FBS in scoring Defense. We cannot be that lacking in talent. That's saying our talent couldn't play defense in the WAC or Mtn West conference. And, we don't have a single starter that doesn't have at least 1 Varsity Letter, and no Fr. start on Defense.