Saban: Recruiting Men of Character

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #40 on:** August 02, 2011, 12:40:44 PM »

Lord Saybinz presents, Real Men of Character

Reeeeaall Men of Charaaacter.

Today, we salute you, Mister Statutory Rapist Blowjob Getter

Mr. Statutoryrapistblowjobgeeeeetter

While other guys are having sex with girls their own age in a car....YOU entice little girls into the locker room to play tonsil hockey with your giggle stick

I see Mr. Winky

Token · « **Reply #41 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:03:05 PM »

Â§43.3. Oral sexual battery

A. Oral sexual battery is the intentional engaging in any of the following acts with another person, who is not the spouse of the offender when the other person has not yet attained fifteen years of age and is at least three years younger than the offender:

That's the charge. Is there much difference between 14 and 15?

If most 14 year old females are emotionally unstable and can easily be coerced into sucking dick in a locker room while at school, then they shouldn't be allowed to attend school with 18 year old males. If they willingly engage in the activity, they should be punished just as harshly as the other party. If an 18 year old senior engages in a sexual act with a 14 year old freshman, he should not be charged with a felony and he should not have to register as a sex offender.

That's my stance, and it's not going to change. If it's proven in court that the 14 year old in LA was forced to perform oral sex when she didn't want to, then by all means, register the kid and send him to prison...because that's what the law says. But if there's a video, and she isn't giving any signs of not wanting to be there, regardless of what she tells daddy when she gets caught, then I believe it's bullshit to charge the kid with a felony and make him register.

Kaos · « **Reply #42 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:05:38 PM »

Quote from: Token on August 02, 2011, 12:08:05 PM

Are they sexually active because they choose to be or because they are all being raped? That's the issue at hand. If they are sexually active, it's because they choose to be. And if they choose to perform sexual acts, they shouldn't be allowed to go back and press charges once they are caught.

Fourteen year old doesn't have the right to make that choice.

Should you prosecute a store owner because he sold a 14-year old a case of beer? Her choice. She wanted it and drank a dozen.

Should you prosecute the strip club owner because he let a 14 year old perform? Her choice. She wanted to dance and has nice little nubs.

Your argument is one of the worst ever attempted in the history of humanity. It fails on every possible moral point. You've lost a shit-ton of respect even attempting to argue this point.

Godfather · « **Reply #43 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:12:06 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on August 02, 2011, 01:05:38 PM

Fourteen year old doesn't have the right to make that choice.

Should you prosecute a store owner because he sold a 14-year old a case of beer? Her choice. She wanted it and drank a dozen. Maybe she was thirsty besides she needed to get the taste out of her mouth.

Should you prosecute the strip club owner because he let a 14 year old perform? Her choice. She wanted to dance and has nice little nubs. Good for her, she has an after school job

Your argument is one of the worst ever attempted in the history of humanity. It fails on every possible moral point. You've lost a shit-ton of respect even attempting to argue this point. Moral..it rhymes with Coral.... say that would be a great stage name

Townhallsavoy · « **Reply #44 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:14:48 PM »

Quote from: Token on August 02, 2011, 01:03:05 PM

they shouldn't be allowed to attend school with 18 year old males.

100% with you on this one.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #45 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:23:14 PM »

I may be off base here but I don't think Token is arguing for it to be okay for an 18 and 14 year old to hook up. It appears the issue is whether or not the guy should be charged with a felony and branded for life. I understand the whole debate over the ability of a 14 year old to make any kind of rational, somewhat mature decision. And yes, I think an 18 year old can easily persuade a girl that age to do something that unfortunately, in this day and age is perfectly acceptable in that culture, in that setting. Not talking black or white here because the post I made earlier referred to a little 2A school in the country with 95% good ole country boys and girls.

Whether he entices her into doing it or she asks him if she can ride the bologna pony, it's wrong. Worthy of a felony conviction and a scarlet letter? Not hardly.

Godfather · « **Reply #46 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:35:56 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on August 02, 2011, 01:23:14 PM

I may be off base here but I don't think Token is arguing for it to be okay for an 18 and 14 year old to hook up. It appears the issue is whether or not the guy should be charged with a felony and branded for life. I understand the whole debate over the ability of a 14 year old to make any kind of rational, somewhat mature decision. And yes, I think an 18 year old can easily persuade a girl that age to do something that unfortunately, in this day and age is perfectly acceptable in that culture, in that setting. Not talking black or white here because the post I made earlier referred to a little 2A school in the country with 95% good ole country boys and girls.

Whether he entices her into doing it or she asks him if she can ride the bologna pony, it's wrong. Worthy of a felony conviction and a scarlet letter? Not hardly.

They could be fascist anarchists, it still wouldn't change the fact that you aren't getting a blow job.

Godfather · « **Reply #47 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:38:07 PM »

It is not SEX!

Signed,
William Jefferson Clinton

Kaos · « **Reply #48 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:39:32 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on August 02, 2011, 01:23:14 PM

Whether he entices her into doing it or she asks him if she can ride the bologna pony, it's wrong. Worthy of a felony conviction and a scarlet letter? Not hardly.

Yep.

That's the law. Felony and a brand.

Consequences must be levied.

And for the record? If AU was considering this guy I'd be at the ADs office registering my complaint. I'd have a hard time (that's what she said) supporting the team with him as a player.

Townhallsavoy · « **Reply #49 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:43:10 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on August 02, 2011, 01:23:14 PM

Whether he entices her into doing it or she asks him if she can ride the bologna pony, it's wrong. Worthy of a felony conviction and a scarlet letter? Not hardly.

I asked Token this earlier.

What's it worthy of?

What should the punishment be? Claiming the current punishment is too harsh implies that you have a reasonable punishment that sufficiently fits the crime.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #50 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:44:39 PM »

Quote from: Godfather on August 02, 2011, 01:35:56 PM

They could be fascist anarchists, it still wouldn't change the fact that you aren't getting a blow job.

That's why my wife was smiling so big at our wedding. She knew she'd given her last BJ.

Saniflush · « **Reply #51 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:44:59 PM »

Quote from: Godfather on August 02, 2011, 01:35:56 PM

They could be fascist anarchists, it still wouldn't change the fact that you aren't getting a blow job.

You touch me, I yell rat!

dallaswareagle · « **Reply #52 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:51:13 PM »

Quote from: Token on August 02, 2011, 10:23:29 AM

Go back to school. There is a prominent highschool in my area where it was learned that 9th grade girls had to give 3 blowjobs, with photographic proof, to make the cheerleading squad. Per the Senior cheerleaders. The recipients of the said blowjobs? You guessed it. Senior football players.

Do you blames the 9th graders? Hell, there competing against the female teachers.

wesfau2 · « **Reply #53 on:** August 02, 2011, 01:54:56 PM »

Quote from: Godfather on August 02, 2011, 01:35:56 PM

They could be fascist anarchists, it still wouldn't change the fact that you aren't getting a blow job.

Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism, dude. At least it's an ethos.

Godfather · « **Reply #54 on:** August 02, 2011, 02:01:42 PM »

Quote from: wesfau2 on August 02, 2011, 01:54:56 PM

Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism, dude. At least it's an ethos.

They're the Little Token Urban Achievers - inner city children of promise but without the necessary means for a - necessary means for a higher education. So Mr Token is committed to sending all of them to college.

Saniflush · « **Reply #55 on:** August 02, 2011, 02:03:23 PM »

Quote from: Godfather on August 02, 2011, 02:01:42 PM

They're the Little Token Urban Achievers - inner city children of promise but without the necessary means for a - necessary means for a higher education. So Mr Token is committed to sending all of them to college.

I told that kraut a fucking thousand times that I don't roll on Shabbos!

Token · « **Reply #56 on:** August 02, 2011, 02:21:15 PM »

Quote from: Townhallsavoy on August 02, 2011, 01:43:10 PM

I asked Token this earlier.

What's it worthy of?

What should the punishment be? Claiming the current punishment is too harsh implies that you have a reasonable punishment that sufficiently fits the crime.

I'm good with any charge, felony or misdemeanor, as long as they are granted youthful offender for first time offense and not hit with the community notification act.

Saniflush · « **Reply #57 on:** August 02, 2011, 02:31:28 PM »

Quote from: Token on August 02, 2011, 02:21:15 PM

I'm good with any charge, felony or misdemeanor, as long as they are granted youthful offender for first time offense and not hit with the community notification act.

See I like the community notification portion of it.
Easy way to see the competition.