RWS, you're trying to say you're right based on a flimsy assumption on your part. I think that the evidence to the issues at hand FAR outweigh my need to sit here and go 5 page rounds with you.
Chizad just knocked your dick in the dirt anyway on the "promoting his business" aspect. If you don't get where the issue is, there's nothing we can do or say that's worth arguing with you about.
No, I've simply asked you, how is the autograph signing supposed to be promoted? Is there an NCAA rule saying an autograph signing can't be held in front of particular stores? By naming where the autograph signing is taking place, regardless of location, is that considered a promotion of where it is taking place? Inside a mall, does that mean it is promoting just the location that it is taking place in front of, the mall itself, etc? No need to go 5 pages with me. Those are outright questions I am asking you. The problem is, it just isn't as black and white as you want it to be.
Chizad hasn't knocked my dick in the dirt with anything. He put up a bunch of video of players who no longer have eligibility being featured in commercials. Oh, and the senior day video? When they show the picture of Arenas, the background is a 2010 National Champions background. It even mentions they are national champions. That's a pretty good indicator that the autograph signing was being held AFTER the NC. Players who have played their last game in college can do whatever the fuck they want. Perfectly legal. Sure, those videos are showing that he would like to promote his store and attach Alabama players to it. But the fact is, every one of those videos is legal as far as NCAA is concerned because those players had played their last game.
303 Replies
44233 Views