This is what I was replying to....does this not have to do with my point?
I didn't agree with him 100% of the time on things he said. I had always agreed with his premise that Chizik at the time (bama dominance) did not appear to be the right man for the job. Where we separated was that I was willing to give him a chance and see how things panned out. Kaos (while not really having a choice) was more vocal and thought he would fail based on his past experiences.
What a lot of you fail to understand and still do, is that Kaos was a persona. He argued with you, because it got under your skin, and you argued back. Some of you took it personally.
Okay. Fair enough. I just don't think you can understand what my point is, because of the very point I was trying to make. Haha.
Simply put, unless you were in my, Chizad's or others that went through it, it wouldn't make sense to you. Fact is, and I guarantee it's true, we were combined, accused, shot up, spit out and in countless threads we had ZERO to do with. Yes, he got under our skin, because 90% was either bullshit mischaracterizations, misquotes, complete fabrications or worse.
Again, you did NOT have to go through that. Ever. Consider yourself lucky, and just understand that his return is welcomed, but tempered by a very cautious expectation that it could unravel into the same shit it did before whether some of us want it that way or not.