As the rest of the Auburn football team was enjoying a day at the water park, away from the intensity of two-a-days before the season, offensive coordinator Gus Malzahn was working.He stalked from ride to ride, scouting, surveying, probing with questions.And he wasn’t looking for the shortest line.“He was just going around on the rides talking to people about football, picking people out and telling them what they did wrong on this or what they did wrong on that and how to get better,†tight end Philip Lutzenkirchen said. “He’s definitely an interesting personality where he is just always on his business.â€For now, that “business†has entirely to do with trying to outscheme Oregon in the national championship game.A week ago, when news reports had him all but out the door to Vanderbilt, that wasn’t the case.But with a lucrative new contract in place, the biggest game of his career coming up and his most worthy opponent to date on deck, Malzahn can get back into that whole “single-minded focus†thing he does so well.“I like being on the field,†Malzahn said. “That’s what I like.â€He’s been called the “Harry Potter†of offensive coordinators, the guy who’s “football mind doesn’t have an off switch.â€A “genius†who literally wrote the book on his record-breaking offense.“Coach Malzahn has set the bar very high for this team on the offensive side of the ball. He expects us to do great things,†quarterback Cam Newton said. “He doesn’t let us shy away from us getting the job done. He expects a lot from us as a whole offense. Every single day he reminds us of that.â€Auburn’s gained enough yards to go down the length of a football field about 121 times in Malzahn’s two years in charge.The Tigers have scored on 90.2 percent of the times they’ve reached the red zone, averaged 6.8 yards per play and gotten a first down once every three plays.Malzahn’s offenses have made the outstanding seem mundane.“Every week he gets us ready to see everything we can see from the defense,†running back Mike Dyer said. “He makes sure that we know everything that’s going to go on, what’s going to happen and which quarter. He just has a genius way about him.“He’s just one of those guys who knows everything when it’s about to happen. Before it does, he tells us exactly what’s going to happen, and we’ll go out there and see the exact same thing he’s talking about.â€It’s these sorts of things that made Auburn want to up Malzahn’s yearly compensation to a reported $1.3 million, making him one of the highest-paid assistants in the country.And it’s his mind, creativity and ridiculous attention to detail that allows the university to feel like he’s earning every penny of his new deal.The word “perfectionist†comes to mind.“I think he’s going to be a little harder on himself than normal coaches. I think he’s been that way through his whole lifetime,†Dyer said. “I’ve seen him getting upset about a marker not working because he needed a marker so he could draw a play up. It’s just little things that you’ll be like shocked, because it’s easy to get another marker. But he wanted that marker.“He’s a great guy. We just love him, because he cares about us and about the game.â€Only with Malzahn does a day at the water park turn into another teaching session.“He’s kind of 24-7 football. He just is always thinking about football and what we can do to get better,†Lutzenkirchen said.“He’ll crack a joke every now and then. It might not be funny, but he’ll try.â€
The Rainman of College Football.
The Tigers have scored on 90.2 percent of the times they’ve reached the red zone, averaged 6.8 yards per play and gotten a first down once every three plays.
Bad analogy.
David Pollack wept.
Actually....No. Perfect analogy.Savant Syndrome - All people with savant syndrome have an amazing memorythat is very focused in one area.
No. Bad analogy. Rainman was an idiot savant.
I'm talking more about his Knowledge Quotient than his IQ. You know Albert Einstein was a Savant too. His "KQ" was lower than Rain Man's.
You know that Ray "Rain Man" Babbitt was a fictional character lacking any attributes that can be compared to a living breathing human being, right?
You know that Rain Man was based off of an actual living, breathing, human being, right?
So was Sherlock Holmes. No shit.
Still a bad analogy.You should have compared him to Kim Peek, and everyone would have known what you were talking about.These intarwebz are serious business.
Kim "The Real Rain Man" Peak. The character in Rain Man was based off him. If I would've compared him to Kim Peek, it would've been the same as saying that he's Rain Man, plus not that many people on this board would've known who Kim Peek was....apparently
Still gotta say the analogy is wrong.