Rankings

[djsimp]

I have many leather bound books.

And an antique telescope. It can see deep into space.

[CCTAU]

What substitution for logic are these voters using to possibly say that Oregon is an undoubted #1 team in the country while we're merely holding the slight edge over two non-AQ schools for the #2 spot?

HOPE!

[Saniflush]

For those of you who like numbers not crunched by No Huddle.

http://masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

http://www.gberatings.com/

[AUTiger1]

For those of you who like numbers not crunched by No Huddle.

http://masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

http://www.gberatings.com/

 

[JR4AU]

For those of you who like numbers not crunched by No Huddle.

http://masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

http://www.gberatings.com/

I'm comfruzed.

[jmar]

I just think the criteria is higher for Auburn even with the best player in college football. We had a very good season turn decent last year, some close victories to date,  given up a lot of points while looking silly in doing so and that is their impression of Auburn. The regional bias has always existed so the computer input must be at fault. Auburn must jump through more hoops.

[AUChizad]

Where you see that?  I would like to have it on hand for some arguments on other boards.

You do realize that there are only 120 Division 1 teams right?

Most of the ones I have seen up through this week have us in the mid 20s and Oregon just over 100 but your point is still pretty valid.

I got my info from the skreets, AKA WAR EAGLE!!!'s post in the PLEASE thread.

[AUChizad]

I got my info from the skreets, AKA WAR EAGLE!!!'s post in the PLEASE thread.

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2010/Internet/toughest%20schedule/9games_cumm.pdf

Actually We're #2 and they're #136.

[Godfather]

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2010/Internet/toughest%20schedule/9games_cumm.pdf

Actually We're #2 and they're #136.

Again all we gotta do is get there...let them not show us any respect.

[Saniflush]

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2010/Internet/toughest%20schedule/9games_cumm.pdf

Actually We're #2 and they're #136.

If you are only going to use the W/L criteria then that table has some really solid info in it.

[djsimp]

Again all we gotta do is get there...let them not show us any respect.

I know what you're thinking and I like it. Their ignorance is only fuel to our fire.

[eagleair89]

Since this year is a "win and in" scenario, watching the polls is not as exciting and excruciating as it was in 2004.........

but I did find this site and I think it has some pretty neat info regarding the polls:

http://www.pollspeak.com/pollstalker/pollstalker.php?s=13&p=27&t1=9&t2=&v=406&w=11&r=V

enjoy!

ps: If you dig around on the site a little bit, you can find information on all 6 of the computer polls as well as some information regarding the Coach's Poll and in-depth breakdown of the AP Poll.......wonder if xCTT is one of our 4 first place votes?

pps: other coaches of interest that vote in the Coach's Poll:

Urban Meyer
Nick Saban
Dan Mullen
Jimbo Fisher
Bobby Petrino
David Cutcliffe
George O'Leary
Paul Rhoads
Mark Richt
Steve Spurrier
Howard Schnellenberger
Ron Zook

by agreement, the Coach's must vote the winner of the BCS title games as #1..........a few of the guys on the above list are going to have a seizure IF Auburn can win out and they HAVE to vote for them.