lol.
Laugh all you want. Stamp it with your "big fat fail" stamp all you want. It's true. I'm sure there are kids out there bitter towards AU for various reasons. It doesn't mean we should villify AU for it, though.
Agreed IFF they are independently tested. According to one, he was shocked, or surpised he didn't pass. He thought he was fine. If Saban wants that kid to fail a physical, I promise you the team physician is going to find a reason to fail them, or give them non-football options.
Again, half of the SEC medical dismissals over the last three years. It's a trend that seems bunk for bama.
You're attaching your own little stipulation to try an "win" your argument. The standard of care is by the team doctors. Until you come up with some pretty substantial proof that Saban is telling doctors to fail perfectly healthy kids, you don't have a leg to stand on with this argument.
Right, so let the kid continue to take player benefits also, like free tickets...right? Cause all students get this perk.....
So, how is this fair to the kids on the roster that are able to bring something to the table for the team? I mean, by keeping an injured kid who the coaches know they aren't ever going to play in a game on the roster, is that not taking away from the kids who are able to participate? Is it not just wasting the coaches time, and the kid who is injured time?
When a kid is injured, and the doctors say he shouldn't play or participate, you're creating a liability by having him around. I know that sounds bad, but it's true. Whether he is on the scout team, starting, or only lifting weights. All it takes is him aggrivating the injury and causing some permanent damage to sue the school. Either way, it will be the coaches fault in his mind.