Twelve, not "two". Those were just a couple guys they talked to, and he mentioned that he was still "bitter" and felt he still could have played. Bottom line is, what was his alternative if he'd said "no"? Do you really think Saban was going to let him play? I don't, and I'm not blinded by fandom in thinking so either.
Alright. So three players said they felt as though they were pressured. You really think the author of this article only called those 3 and not all 12? I don't. Unless they really are that shitty of a journalist. They called all fucking 12, and found 3 who would speak ill of the situation. And if they'd said no to the medical leave? I really doubt they would have played. But how is that any different than the situation they were already in? Neither of the guys listed were anywhere near the top of the depth chart, and they most likely would have gone the rest of their careers without seeing playing time. It happens. There's 85 players on scholarship every year at major programs and only 40-50 actually see meaningful game time. That's how it works. So yeah, they could have said no, and still been on the team. No one is guaranteed playing time. It was their decision, and they both are on record saying
THEY chose to take the medical leave.
You're right about whether these articles would be written if Alabama was under different circumstances, but Alabama is undefeated, unbeaten in the regular season over the past few years, and people seem to be thinking they're using shenanigans to get players on the field that shouldn't be there in place of students that were still fit to play.
"People seem to thing" means shit. People seemed to think Obama was going to swoop in, fix the economy, pay for people's gas/mortgages and create world peace. Guess what? People are fucking stupid. As I said, find a player who WASN'T hurt and WAS forced to quit the team, THEN there is a fucking problem...and a headline story.
"You're also right about it being par for the course for people and writers to be talking shit about Saban. Yeah, sports writers and bloggers, but the Wall Street Journal? Really? Why do they give enough of a shit to publish this? Why not scoot it off as an AP report in the USA Today or another paper with a more prominent sports section?"
Maybe the author is an LSU graduate. Maybe he/she is a Dolphin fan. Maybe they watch a lot of Tosh O, saw the attention he got busting on Saban, and decided they wanted some of that action.
I'm just saying that Saban's continuously ridiculous actions and attitude continue to bring more unwanted attention to a program that needs as little white glove treatment as possible.
Again, if Alabama was unranked and getting the fuck kicked out of them, nobody would give a shit about Saban's actions. Nor would there be weekly articles about it. Maybe once every few months someone would have a "we told you so Alabama" article, but then they'd get back to their regular articles on the top teams.
let alone a normal, everyday thing.
Actually, it has been a normal, everyday thing. Since he was named head coach at Alabama, it's been non stop. ESPN, CBS sportsline, Wall Street Journal, and countless of other major news sources. People said he would leave in 3 years. People said he'd never be able to recruit at Alabama because parents wouldn't trust him. People said he'd never win an SEC Championship at Bama.
He's still here. He's still recruiting a lot of top talent. He's already won the SEC and BCS. They can keep writing their stories. I'm certain hundreds (like the douche bag out of Miami who stands in on PTI) of journalists are just waiting for Saban to stumble. Or Alabama to get beat. When it happens? It happens. It could happen in 2 days. It's inevitable. But until it does? I'm going to enjoy the ride.