So you're saying that Fannin and McCalebb are both All-SEC caliber running backs? No way a true freshmen would beat them out in Fall camp because they're that badass?
I'm comparing two average teams with two average starting runnings backs. One team had a true freshman not only win the job early but now dominates SEC defenses. The other is still working his way up the depth chart and not seeing time until the 2nd half.
Dyer's great, but it's easy to see he's not as good as Lattimore right now.
Please. Shit, folks read whatever they please in to shit. I said he didn't get the work in camp the other two did. Reason? Fannin was supposed to be the guy. McCaleb was supposed to be the other guy. Despire what folks are saying about McCaleb, he's doing ok. He hasn't broken the big one yet, but he's ok averaging 6 yds a carry. Fannin, just isn't ever going to materialize. The coaches only have X number of hours a week to practice. The starters get the bulk of those reps once it's known they'll be the starters. Fannin was the guy. Talented though he (Dyer) is, coaches always defer to experience, until it's proved that younger talent can do a BETTER job. Sometimes that talent doesn't get the chance to prove that in camp. He may show flashes of it, and it may get the coaches attention, but in the backs of their minds they coaches are always thinking "but this isn't a full speed SEC opponent looking to kill us". Shit changes...you can't simulate that. Lattimore stepped in to a position where he had nobody ahead of him other than Miles and Giles, both only Soph., and only with a combined 170 carries last year. There wasn't much doubt he'd compete for the job, and likely be given enough reps to win it if he was able. Dyer, wasn't. It's that simple. He'll start getting the now though, you can bet on it. Will Lattimore be "better"? He may be more valuabe to his team...he might even be better. Dyer is pretty damned good.