Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

So since we have Lawson and Adams

Godfather

  • Chapter
  • ****
  • 21263
  • He knows!
    • Tigers X
So since we have Lawson and Adams
« on: February 12, 2013, 05:32:32 PM »
Why not move LaDarius Owens to LB?

No. 8-ranked outside linebacker and No. 4 player in Alabama by Rivals.com

Why do we have this constant need to take players who excelled at a position in HS and make him try to fit elsewhere.  See Daren Bates.

 :facepalm:
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Gus is gone, hooray!
                       -Auburn Fans


Auburn Forum

AUTiger1

  • ****
  • 9872
  • Eat a Peach
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2013, 09:46:52 PM »
Well Adams is inside DT, but we did pick up Daniel at DE and have several DE's on the roster.  I would hope that maybe this staff doesn't have the hard on to make HS LB's into DE's like the last staff did and we can see either Sanders or Owens move to LB.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Courage is only fear holding on a minute longer.--George S. Patton

There are gonna be days when you lay your guts on the line and you come away empty handed, there ain't a damn thing you can do about it but go back out there and lay em on the line again...and again, and again! -- Coach Pat Dye

It isn't that liberals are ignorant. It's just they know so much that isn't so. --Ronald Reagan

War Eagle!!!

  • ****
  • 8292
  • The Original Backwards Hat
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2013, 10:38:34 PM »
Well Adams is inside DT, but we did pick up Daniel at DE and have several DE's on the roster.  I would hope that maybe this staff doesn't have the hard on to make HS LB's into DE's like the last staff did and we can see either Sanders or Owens move to LB.

Someone on the Bunker mentioned they were hearing Ford as LB...
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

djsimp

  • *
  • 13946
  • Why don't you blow me ump!
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2013, 09:42:36 AM »
Someone on the Bunker mentioned they were hearing Ford as LB...

That would be the shiznit but I still would think moving Owens makes more sense.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

AUTiger1

  • ****
  • 9872
  • Eat a Peach
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2013, 01:13:29 PM »
Someone on the Bunker mentioned they were hearing Ford as LB...

Do.Not.Want.  Before he hurt his back he was starting to blow up, would rather him stay at DE. 

EDIT:  I can sorta see it though.  Him and Owens were both 4* LB's coming out of HS.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Courage is only fear holding on a minute longer.--George S. Patton

There are gonna be days when you lay your guts on the line and you come away empty handed, there ain't a damn thing you can do about it but go back out there and lay em on the line again...and again, and again! -- Coach Pat Dye

It isn't that liberals are ignorant. It's just they know so much that isn't so. --Ronald Reagan

Buzz Killington

  • *
  • 22897
  • Bofa
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2013, 01:51:04 PM »
Do.Not.Want.  Before he hurt his back he was starting to blow up, would rather him stay at DE. 

EDIT:  I can sorta see it though.  Him and Owens were both 4* LB's coming out of HS.

I think he would make one hell of an OLB in a 3-4 scheme, but a much better DE in the 4-3.  Either way, if he's healthy he's gonna blow some shit up this season.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Now I may be an idiot, but there is one thing I am not, sir, and that, sir, is an idiot.

AUTiger1

  • ****
  • 9872
  • Eat a Peach
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2013, 01:53:18 PM »
I think he would make one hell of an OLB in a 3-4 scheme, but a much better DE in the 4-3.  Either way, if he's healthy he's gonna blow some shit up this season.

He might and I can see it b/c of him playing there in HS.  After the Grooves experiment of moving a DE and placing him at OLB, I just get uneasy. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Courage is only fear holding on a minute longer.--George S. Patton

There are gonna be days when you lay your guts on the line and you come away empty handed, there ain't a damn thing you can do about it but go back out there and lay em on the line again...and again, and again! -- Coach Pat Dye

It isn't that liberals are ignorant. It's just they know so much that isn't so. --Ronald Reagan

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: So since we have Lawson and Adams
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2013, 01:56:21 PM »
Whatever they called him (L. Owens) during his "crootment" he played with his hand on the ground as a DE more often than not in HS.   I suspect they played him at "LB" when they needed the best athlete on the field there.  He's now listed at 6-3, 260, and I can't see him playing a true LB in this scheme, but that's just a guess.  Hell, they may move him to CB for all I know. 

friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions