First you are the one who used the word hate. Not I.
You are assuming too much. Every hire Jacobs has hired to this point seems to be going the right direction but that is all. If you are ready king him AD for life that's your business. I am not. I hope he turns out to be better than Jeff Beard but he has a long row to hoe before that will the the case.
All I said was that I am no fan of Jacobs being AD. Doesn't mean that he will be a bad one or that he will not grow into the job. I was no fan of his predecessor. I thought he to be a much better writer than AD but that was my opinion.
To answer your question I want long term stability within our athletic department. We shall see if Jacobs brings that by hiring the right people (which on the surface it seems he has done a reasonable job of) to keeping the right people.
We're playing semantics I guess. When I read "I'm no fan of _______", it comes across as "I dislike ________". Not ready to crown him greatest AD of all time? Fair enough. Yes, Beard was a fantastic AD. I agree with you on Housel as well, and therefore think Jacobs is, at least, a step up. Whoever hired Dye, Sonny, & Baird in the late 70's/early 80's would be the only AD I'd say was definitely ahead of him. By the way, who was that? I know Dye took over in 81, so I guess he gets credit for Baird. I guess he was hired by the University to replace the previous AD? It wasn't Barfield, was it?
Either way, I guess whoever preceded Dye as AD and Dye would have to split the credit for the 80's being as great as they were. Jacobs has built this all by himself. And whoever hired Dye, probably hired Barfield too, so there's that...
Just saying,
every one of his hires have been outstanding. Give the guy the benefit of the doubt as at least a
good AD, even if not the
best AD.