WHERE THE HELL???

[Birmingham]

I'M LOOKING FOR THE DAMN RECRUITING RANKINGS ON THE DAMN ESPNU WEB-DAMN SITE AND IT'S LIKE THEY HIDE THE SHIT!!!??!???  WHY THE HELL IS IT NOT ON THE FRONT DAMN PAGE?  IT'S NATIONAL DAMN SIGNING DAY YOU BUNCH OF DUMBASSESS.

Any help would be cool.

[Kaos]

You have to use an alternate URL.  Try this:

www.fuckyouyougloatingfuck.com

[Catphish Tilly]

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/classrankings?classyear=2009

[Birmingham]

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/classrankings?classyear=2009

Those are recruiting rankings, that's from a few days ago, just gives information about what the teams are looking like.

[Catphish Tilly]

my bad.  didnt pay attention to that.

here, how 'bout this instead: 

[The Prowler]

Here ya go.....

ESPN:
LSU #1
uat #2
Auburn #25 (ESPN doesn't rate the Juco or Prep School guys)
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/classrankings

Scout:
OSU #1
LSU #2
uat #3
Auburn #15
http://auburn.scout.com/a.z?s=6&p=9&c=14&yr=2009

Rivals:
uat #1
LSU #2
Auburn #18
http://auburn.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?

[ssgaufan]

Here ya go.....

ESPN:
LSU #1
uat #2
Auburn #25 (ESPN doesn't rate the Juco or Prep School guys)
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/classrankings

Scout:
OSU #1
LSU #2
uat #3
Auburn #15
http://auburn.scout.com/a.z?s=6&p=9&c=14&yr=2009

Rivals:
uat #1
LSU #2
Auburn #18
http://auburn.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?

Wow, what a shocker!  Rivals continues their love fest with the dark pink turds.

[Birmingham]

Wow, what a shocker!  Rivals continues their love fest with the dark pink turds.

Kind of odd that you didn't mention a "love fest" for OSU on scout.

1st:  4 (5 stars)  -  14 (4 stars)
2nd: 4 (5 stars)  -  11 (4 stars)
3rd:  2 (5 stars)  -  15 (4 stars)

What about that seems biased?  Do you think 2nd place should be first with 3 less 4 stars and the same amount of 5 stars????  And 3rd place having 1 more 4 star but 2 less 5 stars??? 

I'm really asking.

[Snaggletiger]

Kind of odd that you didn't mention a "love fest" for OSU on scout.

1st:  4 (5 stars)  -  14 (4 stars)
2nd: 4 (5 stars)  -  11 (4 stars)
3rd:  2 (5 stars)  -  15 (4 stars)

What about that seems biased?  Do you think 2nd place should be first with 3 less 4 stars and the same amount of 5 stars????  And 3rd place having 1 more 4 star but 2 less 5 stars??? 

I'm really asking.

I'm not arguing.  Bammie has kicked ass the last 2-3 years in recruiting.  I'm just ready to get back in the game.