Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

2004?

ssgaufan

  • ***
  • 4123
  • WDE!!!
2004?
« on: October 02, 2011, 10:55:24 PM »
Is there another 2004 BCS senario shaping up?  I think so.  Wisconsin looks scary good, and should win the Big 10+2.  If Oklahoma (damn they fit in nicely again) runs the table they will be in it because as long as you don't lose you won't fall out of the top two spots.  If the winner of the LSU/bammer game is undefeated then there is your second participant.  Fuck Boise, I think everybody is tired of hearing about them anyway.  So the best chance for a third BCS AQ team being undefeated is Wisconsin.  Plus, Auburn with a lake could walk on through the ACC and be a fourth team in that mix. 

Any thoughts?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

jmar

  • ****
  • 10633
Re: 2004?
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2011, 11:35:53 PM »
Is there another 2004 BCS senario shaping up?  I think so.  Wisconsin looks scary good, and should win the Big 10+2.  If Oklahoma (damn they fit in nicely again) runs the table they will be in it because as long as you don't lose you won't fall out of the top two spots.  If the winner of the LSU/bammer game is undefeated then there is your second participant.  Fuck Boise, I think everybody is tired of hearing about them anyway.  So the best chance for a third BCS AQ team being undefeated is Wisconsin.  Plus, Auburn with a lake could walk on through the ACC and be a fourth team in that mix. 

Any thoughts?
Yeah. The best I've seen are Alabama/LSU and Wisconsin.
                                                           
After that I think Boise can match-up with Oklahoma and would beat Stanford, Clemson, OSU, Oregon or Michigan.
                                                           
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

djsimp

  • *
  • 13946
  • Why don't you blow me ump!
Re: 2004?
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2011, 09:05:49 AM »
Is there another 2004 BCS senario shaping up?  I think so.  Wisconsin looks scary good, and should win the Big 10+2.  If Oklahoma (damn they fit in nicely again) runs the table they will be in it because as long as you don't lose you won't fall out of the top two spots.  If the winner of the LSU/bammer game is undefeated then there is your second participant.  Fuck Boise, I think everybody is tired of hearing about them anyway.  So the best chance for a third BCS AQ team being undefeated is Wisconsin.  Plus, Auburn with a lake could walk on through the ACC and be a fourth team in that mix. 

Any thoughts?

Well, since bama and LSU play, that will thin out the herd a little that is if there are two or three undefeated teams left. Wisconsin looks bad ass and Clemson seems to be only getting better. I think you may be on the right track here. I think Oklahoma may slip somewhere down the line though.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

AUChizad

  • Female Pledge Trainer
  • ***
  • 19523
  • Auburn Basketball Hits Everything
Re: 2004?
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2011, 09:14:37 AM »
Team-Ranked opponents remaining:

1. Boise-
2. Wisconsin-19
3. Stanford-9
4. Clemson-13,18
5. GT-8,21
6. Alabama-1,15
7. Oklahoma St-11,25,20,3
8. LSU-17,15,2,10
9. Oklahoma-11,20,24,25,6

I think LSU & Oklahoma are the two best teams on the list, but also have the toughest schedule ahead. Really not fair to consider that if they slip, Boise Fuckin' State is the most likely to take their place.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2011, 09:16:32 AM by AUChizad »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Kaos

  • *
  • 29535
  • It's GO time
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: 2004?
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2011, 09:52:13 AM »
If it's not us, I don't really care unless it is them. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Re: 2004?
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2011, 10:03:23 AM »
OU and Okie State will determine one half of the BCS Champ game, and LSU/Bama will determine the other.

That being said, I really hope Clemson and Whisky run the table.

For all the shit talking Dabo's done, he's about to become the worlds biggest Auburn fan.  He needs us to beat LSU or Bama, if he wants any chance of playing for the National Title.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

ssgaufan

  • ***
  • 4123
  • WDE!!!
Re: 2004?
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2011, 10:13:51 AM »
OU and Okie State will determine one half of the BCS Champ game, and LSU/Bama will determine the other.

That being said, I really hope Clemson and Whisky run the table.

For all the shit talking Dabo's done, he's about to become the worlds biggest Auburn fan.  He needs us to beat LSU or Bama, if he wants any chance of playing for the National Title.

Fuck Dabo, I hope we lose em both.  Wait, what?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

AUChizad

  • Female Pledge Trainer
  • ***
  • 19523
  • Auburn Basketball Hits Everything
Re: 2004?
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2011, 10:19:33 AM »
Other teams currently undefeated, not in that list:

Michigan- 19, 14
Illinois- 12, 4
Kansas State- 3, 6, 24, 11
Texas- 3, 6, 20, 24, 25




friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

GH2001

  • *
  • 23848
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: 2004?
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2011, 10:20:43 AM »
Other teams currently undefeated, not in that list:

Michigan- 19, 14
Illinois- 12, 4
Kansas State- 3, 6, 24, 11
Texas- 3, 6, 20, 24, 25
I don't think anyone thinks Denard Robinson's Hail Mary Jump Ball passes will go his way forever.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

Re: 2004?
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2011, 10:30:07 AM »
Fuck Dabo, I hope we lose em both.  Wait, what?

Yeah, the more I think about it, fuck that cock smoker.  I hope GT smokes them.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions