My point? Are you fucking serious? Schad and Schlabach were two people that first "reported" on the issue. Notice how they're saying that the NCAA stated that Rogers was the one that had the pay-for-play scheme not that Cecil was the one begging Universities to pay. I think that's a pretty fucking important statement.
I asked YOUR point, not Schads. I wasn't unaware of the difference, but am aware also that Schad's reporting is so haphazzard that it doesn't surprise me to see him seemingly shift gears, or forget the shit he made up 6 months ago.