Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Auburn 2009 vs Auburn 2010

Tiger Wench

  • ******
  • 10352
  • Does this armour make my ass look big?
Auburn 2009 vs Auburn 2010
« on: November 04, 2010, 05:29:43 PM »
Auburn vs. Auburn, a statistical analysis: Week 10
By: David Morrison
November 04, 2010

Remember: pluses under Auburn in the "change" categories mean the Tigers are statistically better this year, just like minuses under opponents. Unless we're talking about giveaways. Or, again, penalties.

Auburn

Rush Attempts

2010: 431
2009: 402
Change: +7.2%

Rush Yards

2010: 2769
2009: 2018
Change: +37.2%

Yards Per Rush

2010: 6.4
2009: 5.0
Change: +28.0%

Rushing Touchdowns

2010: 27
2009: 16
Change: +68.8%

Pass Attempts

2010: 173
2009: 246
Change: -29.7%

Pass Yards

2010: 1697
2009: 1830
Change: -7.3%

Yards Per Attempt

2010: 9.8
2009: 7.4
Change: +32.4%

Completion Percentage

2010: 66.5
2009: 55.3
Change: +11.2%

Passing Touchdowns

2010: 16
2009: 16
Change: 0.0%

Passer Efficiency

2010: 173.6
2009: 136.0
Change: +27.6%

Total Plays

2010: 604
2009: 648
Change: -6.8%

Total Yards

2010: 4466
2009:  3848
Change: +16.1%

Yards Per Play

2010: 7.4
2009: 5.9
Change: +25.4%

Giveaways

2010: 12
2009: 13
Change: -7.7%

3rd-Down Conversion Rate

2010: 50.0
2009: 39.7
Change: +10.3%

Avg. Time of Possession

2010: 29:07
2009: 27:49
Change: +4.7%

Points

2010: 360
2009: 287
Change: +25.4%

Opponents

Rush Attempts

2010: 302
2009: 352
Change: -14.2%

Rush Yards

2010: 1045
2009: 1611
Change: -35.1%

Yards Per Rush

2010: 3.5
2009: 4.6
Change: -23.9%

Rushing Touchdowns

2010: 13
2009: 18

Change: -27.8%

Pass Attempts

2010: 329
2009: 297
Change: +10.8%

Pass Yards

2010: 2180
2009: 1732
Change: +25.9%

Yards Per Attempt

2010: 6.6
2009: 5.8
Change: +13.8%

Completion Percentage

2010: 64.4
2009: 54.5
Change: +9.9%

Passing Touchdowns

2010: 15
2009: 11
Change: +36.4%

Passer Efficiency

2010: 130.3
2009: 108.3
Change: +20.3%

Total Plays

2010: 631
2009: 649
Change: -2.8%

Total Yards
2010: 3225
2009:  3343
Change: -3.5%

Yards Per Play

2010: 5.1
2009: 5.2
Change: -1.9%

Giveaways

2010: 16
2009: 18
Change: -11.1%

3rd-Down Conversion Rate

2010: 37.0
2009: 34.8
Change: +2.2%

Avg. Time of Possession

2010: 30:53
2009: 32:11
Change: -4.0%

Points
2010: 219
2009: 235
Change: -6.8%

Auburn Penalties

Number

2010: 56
2009: 61
Change: -9.8%

Yards

2010: 484
2009: 524
Change: -7.6%

What does it all mean?: Well, it's hard to find much wrong with this team right now. Especially on the offensive end.

But here's a troubling sign. The rush defense, which was so mighty at the beginning of the season, isn't so mighty anymore. That split from last season to this season is getting closer and closer as the weeks go by. It used to be up around 40 percent down. Now it's at 35. And the yards per rush gap is closing as well.

Consider, if you will, Auburn's rush yards per game heading into the past four SEC games: 92.8. Consider it now: 116.1. That means 145.3 over the past four games. And 4.6 yards per rush.

Granted, if you take Jeff Scott's 83-yard touchdown rush from last week's game, Ole Miss only gets 135 yards on 30 carries. But you can't. It counted, didn't it? That's like saying without Onterio McCalebb's 68-yard run, Auburn had only 275 yards on 45 carries.

Those numbers should get some help when the Tigers shellack UTC on Saturday. But it doesn't change the fact opponents are starting to figure out that run defense.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Auburn 2009 vs Auburn 2010
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2010, 05:46:47 PM »
Some of the statistical categories are changing to the less favorable as the season goes by because the teams get tougher towards the back end.  The amount of change during this part of the schedule the last 4-6 weeks is completely expected regarding opponents rushing stats.  Best change I note is that wins are up 50% over last year after 9 games.  And that's huge.  Some things about this team can't be measured statically.  I like stats, they give you a picture of some things.  But this team has a confidence now. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Saniflush

  • Pledge Master
  • ****
  • 21656
Re: Auburn 2009 vs Auburn 2010
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2010, 07:41:53 AM »
Some of the statistical categories are changing to the less favorable as the season goes by because the teams get tougher towards the back end.  The amount of change during this part of the schedule the last 4-6 weeks is completely expected regarding opponents rushing stats.  Best change I note is that wins are up 50% over last year after 9 games.  And that's huge.  Some things about this team can't be measured statically.  I like stats, they give you a picture of some things.  But this team has a confidence now.

I am gonna to hump your post for a while and then I may add something myself.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"Hey my friends are the ones that wanted to eat at that shitty hole in the wall that only served bread and wine.  What kind of brick and mud business model is that.  Stick to the cart if that's all you're going to serve.  Then that dude came in with like 12 other people, and some of them weren't even wearing shoes, and the restaurant sat them right across from us. It was gross, and they were all stinky and dirty.  Then dude starts talking about eating his body and drinking his blood...I almost lost it.  That's the last supper I'll ever have there, and I hope he dies a horrible death."