Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Birmingham on November 15, 2009, 10:21:48 AM
-
Dude, keep it together.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2792/4105334085_0d80f5a094_o.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2652/4106101348_78ac40e78d_o.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2581/4105334097_d2070e5d1d_o.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2771/4106101392_f311851fcb_o.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2744/4106101402_737c5ac153_o.jpg)
-
Ben Tate. Easily one of the best in the country, arguably the best in the SEC........
And hasn't beat Georgia (to my knowledge.)
I'd cry too if I was that good, and my team couldn't win anything. It's really disheartening.
-
Ben Tate. Easily one of the best in the country, arguably the best in the SEC........
Arguably??? He IS the best in the SEC, didn't you hear him say it?
-
Arguably??? He IS the best in the SEC, didn't you hear him say it?
Well, I agree. Ingram has a better team to make lanes for him, and he still can't blow away Tate's stats. It's like a Lambo running dead even and not being able to pull away from a Honda.
Embarrassing for the lambo.
-
It's like a leading Heisman candidate running for more yards and touchdowns with less carries than a running back on a 4 loss Auburn team.
Embarrassing for the leading Heisman candidate.
humiliating for sure.
-
Wow. Quote changes. Smack at it's finest.
-
:bugs:
humiliating for sure.
that you're a douche?
-
:bugs:
that you're a douche?
...That this is the best argument he can come up with for a Heisman candidate on a Sunday morning after beating down MSU.
LOL
-
...That this is the best argument he can come up with for a Heisman candidate on a Sunday morning after beating down MSU.
LOL
Not true. You see, unlike Tate, no talking is necessary. Ingram performs on the field.
Oh yeah, he also doesn't cry like a menstrual bitch after the game's over.
-
Not true. You see, unlike Tate, no talking is necessary. Ingram performs on the field.
Oh yeah, he also doesn't cry like a menstrual bitch after the game's over.
No talking necessary? He leaves that to douche-bag fans like yourself.
And please don't talk about his "on the field" performance. He's a fine back, but please, you and I can both name plenty of running backs from the SEC in just the last few years that were better than or as good as him.
He's not special. He's in the discussion because no one else is doing anything special either. It also helps that everyone else on his offense is anywhere from average to useless.
2009: Hardesty, Tate, Dixon, McCluster
2008: Moreno, Scott
2007: McFadden, Jones, Moreno, Foster
2006: McFadden, Jones, Green-Ellis
2005: Irons, McFadden, Darby, Norwood, Little
-
:rofl: at everyone else on offense is useless.
Also, if he's "not special", as you say. What does that say about your crying menstrual bitch? As long as Ingram has more yards, TD's, less carries that your crying menstrual bitch no insult you say will in return not apply to the crying menstrual bitch.
I agree with you, however, the crying menstrual bitch isn't special.
-
:rofl: at everyone else on offense is useless.
Also, if he's "not special", as you say. What does that say about your crying menstrual bitch? As long as Ingram has more yards, TD's, less carries that your crying menstrual bitch no insult you say will in return not apply to the crying menstrual bitch.
I agree with you, however, the crying menstrual bitch isn't special.
Yeah, no one else on your offense is anything to get excited about. McElroy is adequate. Julio? Darvin Adams is pretty sure he's overrated.
And while Tate is good, he's not special either, and no one here is claiming he is special in a national or historical sense. He's also not in the running for the Heisman, as he shouldn't be. No one here is touting Tate for the Heisman.
My point is that Ingram shouldn't be either. He's a good SEC running back, the kind we see 3-4 of every single season. That's why I made you a list of 14 backs from the last few years that were or are every bit as good as Ingram. And that's just from the SEC.
But, as I expected, because Ingram is wearing Crimson, he is somehow superior to the 14 players I listed. :taunt:
-
Nobody is saying that Tate isn't a good back. He's shown he's one of the top in the SEC, no doubt. However, I think you should watch out when publically saying you're better than a back with less carries for more yards who plays on a team that is undefeated and #3 in the country. Just sayin'......you would think that after last year and the whole "We're going to score alot of points on Alabama" quote (I forget who it was from, possibly Tate?), they would learn to watch what they say around Iron Bowl.
-
But, as I expected, because Ingram is wearing Crimson, he is somehow inferior to the 14 players I listed. :taunt:
pot, kettle