Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on September 06, 2009, 11:39:43 AM
-
...What's your opinion of the first game? Not a flame post, I'm just curious to what level your expectations were met, exceeded, nothing?
Thanks, I'll hang up and listen.
-
Yeah, I am interested to see what you guys think too. I like what I see. I had a lot of optimism coming into the game yesterday and I liked what I saw. The coaches really seem to work well together and more importantly, the players seem to LOVE the coaches and seem to be having fun. I read in the paper that the PLAYERS gave the game ball to Chizik. Every quote was how well prepared they were and that the coaches brought a different evergy to the sidelines during the game.
I am not saying Auburn can go 13-0, but I see Auburn being competitive in every game....barring injuries...
I am ready to see this offense against an SEC defense!
And you fucks that downed Chizik forever, need to be as vocal about this game as you have all year. If you can't see positive things happening at Auburn, you are fucking blind....
-
I am ready to see this offense against an SEC defense!
I can agree with this. I didn't see the game, but the first half looks like it was pretty rough. You can mark that up to nerves and alot of other things, I'm sure. I'd like to see what happens against a halfway-quality opponent though.
-
I'd like to see what happens against a halfway-quality opponent though.
I would say LA Tech was "halfway-quality" you ignorant fuck. I wouldn't even say the first half was "rough"...i think Auburn had 270 yards of offense the first half. We fumbled going in to score and also had a penalty on the opening drive that killed us...I think Kodi scores a TD on third and short from about the 10 without the penaly...but we settled for a FG.
Your shit is getting old...
-
I would say LA Tech was "halfway-quality" you ignorant fuck. I wouldn't even say the first half was "rough"...i think about had 270 yards of offense the first half. We fumbled going in to score and also had a penalty on the opening drive that killed us...I think Kodi scores a TD on third and short from about the 10.
Your shit is getting old...
Same story as last season. AU would rack up a shitload of yards, and nobody could understand how the fuck you could rack up so many yards and still look like shit. Halfway quality? As we all know, La Tech returned a shitload of starters from last season. Lets see some stats from last year's 8-5 La Tech team, shall we?
Out of 119 teams:
Rushing Offense: 27
Passing Offense: 102
Passing Efficiency: 108
Scoring Offense: 72
Total Offense: 75
Rushing Defense: 13
Pass Efficiency Defense: 81
Pass Defense: 113
Total Defense: 73
Who wants to argue that the WAC is a tough conference? I don't really think AU's first half is indicitave of anything other than nerves, and getting some bugs worked out. I'm not saying that due to the first half performance, AU will forever suck. Simply saying that La Tech isn't that good of a team, even if they are returning 17 starters.
-
Same story as last season. AU would rack up a shitload of yards, and nobody could understand how the fuck you could rack up so many yards and still look like shit. Halfway quality? As we all know, La Tech returned a shitload of starters from last season. Lets see some stats from last year's 8-5 La Tech team, shall we?
Out of 119 teams:
Rushing Offense: 27
Passing Offense: 102
Passing Efficiency: 108
Scoring Offense: 72
Total Offense: 75
Rushing Defense: 13
Pass Efficiency Defense: 81
Pass Defense: 113
Total Defense: 73
Who wants to argue that the WAC is a tough conference? I don't really think AU's first half is indicitave of anything other than nerves, and getting some bugs worked out. I'm not saying that due to the first half performance, AU will forever suck. Simply saying that La Tech isn't that good of a team, even if they are returning 17 starters.
Nobody here is claiming they are world beaters either, but they don't suck. They are very experienced and a bowl team from last year.
Look, let's put it this way. I think what more people are happy about isn't beating LA Tech. It's the way that we beat them and the execution that went into the gameplan and win.
We might have won the first game last year, but if you remember a lot of folks were NOT happy about HOW we won that game. We didn't look like we had a clue at times.
Our players last night looked like they were educated, knew what they were doing, and confident in executing what was laid in front of them.
JMO... Your constant referral to stats and bullshit is misplaced here.
-
I personally was thrilled that there was no prairie dog imitation last night - that was so ridiculous...
-
I personally was thrilled that there was no prairie dog imitation last night - that was so ridiculous...
We had a few "meerkat manor" moments, but at least it was the exception last night and not the rule like last year. That was awful last year.
-
We had a few "meerkat manor" moments, but at least it was the exception last night and not the rule like last year. That was awful last year.
And the difference was it was only the QB, RB, and WR's that stood up this year. The lineman remained in their stance.
-
...What's your opinion of the first game? Not a flame post, I'm just curious to what level your expectations were met, exceeded, nothing?
Thanks, I'll hang up and listen.
Fucking crickets...amazing...
People damn sure ran their mouths up until this point...
-
Fucking crickets...amazing...
People damn sure ran their mouths up until this point...
Oh, it'll come. There'll be something wrong here. I guarantee it. I'm just curious is all... I feel better about 7 to 8 wins with this offense... Defense has GOT to stay healthy, but we played last night without two DE's and two LB's. I don't know, but I do feel better about things.
I wouldn't have cared if we won that game by a point, as long as we looked like we could execute. THAT was the biggest thing that stood out to me. Also, going down to get that FG with 30 seconds on the clock. That is a MOONSHOT difference in our mentality over the last few years. Aggressive. I liked that a lot and it seemed to really lift the team.
We came out in the second half and forced three straight three and outs. We shut them down after some obvious adjustments.
I'm just curious what someone that has a more "scrutinizing" view might have seen....
-
Fucking crickets...amazing...
People damn sure ran their mouths up until this point...
Yep. There are some (at least 2) very disappointed people waking up this morning. They must be out cutting the grass or cleaning the gutters. Anything that will help them come up with the perfect witty quip about how State is going to rip us a new one.
-
Yep. There are some (at least 2) very disappointed people waking up this morning. They must be out cutting the grass or cleaning the gutters. Anything that will help them come up with the perfect witty quip about how State is going to rip us a new one.
All right, children. One game does not a season make - either plus or minus. I am happy with the way things went last night. The media seems to be making positive statements as well. But it is still too early to declare anything to be a total success or a total failure. So please don't start this shit up again...
-
All right, children. One game does not a season make - either plus or minus. I am happy with the way things went last night. The media seems to be making positive statements as well. But it is still too early to declare anything to be a total success or a total failure. So please don't start this shit up again...
I don't think anyone is claiming a victory party...there have just been some here that say Chizik will be an epic failure. Based on last nights game, and the obvious organization and preparation, I would think it would erase some bit of doubt...
-
BWAAA HAAA HAAAA....
I figured. One game. One game in and some are already breaking their arms trying to pat themselves on the back.
I'll write later, but first let me laugh my phuking ass off at some of the knee jerk instant gratification phuks around here. One game is one game.
I'll also laugh heartily at the number today who are solidly on the Chizik bandwagon and calling for accountability when just a few days ago they were sitting so hard on the fence they've got splinters in their colon. Do people really think that nobody remembers anything they've ever said before? Meh. Whatever.
Quick observations?
Point differential between the first game this year and last is about the same. Quality of opponent is about the same. First half went about the same.
AU won 34-0 (if you remember) to open last season and the back patters (same ones basically) were poopting the floor giggling over how brilliant they were then, too. (How many rushing yards did we have in the season opener last year? 321?)
All that in the books? There were some differences. Last night was much better in terms of the little things. Todd still didn't look great, but he at least looked competent. He made several nice throws but he made some ridiculously bad ones, too.
The Sunday morning after the ULM game there were a thousand red flags flying and a dozen alarm bells ringing. There aren't as many flags today. And the bells are mostly quiet.
It was a fairly solid start. Todd answered questions about his arm strength if not his ability to be the quarterback. His decision-making was still a little sketchy, but the good news is that it seemed to get better as the game progressed. Looked like he gained half a season's worth of confidence.
Burns answered questions about why he's not the guy (that off-balance, psycho throw was hideous). SEC teams will quickly gather that if he's in the game, he's running the ball 95% of the time. Doesn't make it any easier to defend, though.
Team answered questions about its mental makeup. Could have broken down after the fumble going in. Didn't. Converted drives for touchdowns and not field goals.
Team got stronger as the game wore on.
Defense made some stupid mistakes, but played well overall.
Last year I felt like shooting people after the opener. Especially the sunshine and unicorn phuks who couldn't see what was clearly obvious.
Today? I don't feel like shooting anything. It was an encouraging start. It's just one game, but it went about as well as it could have for Auburn.
Good start.
-
These guys fed us a heaping spoonful of bama media fed horseshit all off season. Based on their rantings, I fully expected to see a keystone cops remake on the sideline. I was prepared to see Chizik having to be shown how to run onto the field, because you know he's to dumb to figure it out on his own. I anticipated Gus's "gimmick CUSA" offense struggle to gain 75 yards of total offense against a WAC defense.
These chicken littles ruined the offseason for me and negatively impacted the joy I got coming to this forum. For that, they must pay.
In their eyes, it won't be an Auburn victory as it will be a LT defeat.
-
BWAAA HAAA HAAAA....
I figured. One game. One game in and some are already breaking their arms trying to pat themselves on the back.
Who is doing this?
I'll write later, but first let me laugh my phuking ass off at some of the knee jerk instant gratification phuks around here. One game is one game.
This is why you have a hard time. WHY is this necessary??? ...and who EXACTLY are you referring to?
Quick observations?
Point differential between the first game this year and last is about the same. Quality of opponent is about the same. First half went about the same.
AU won 34-0 (if you remember) to open last season and the back patters (same ones basically) were poopting the floor giggling over how brilliant they were then, too. (How many rushing yards did we have in the season opener last year? 321?)
All that in the books? There were some differences. Last night was much better in terms of the little things. Todd still didn't look great, but he at least looked competent. He made several nice throws but he made some ridiculously bad ones, too.
The Sunday morning after the ULM game there were a thousand red flags flying and a dozen alarm bells ringing. There aren't as many flags today. And the bells are mostly quiet.
It was a fairly solid start. Todd answered questions about his arm strength if not his ability to be the quarterback. His decision-making was still a little sketchy, but the good news is that it seemed to get better as the game progressed. Looked like he gained half a season's worth of confidence.
Burns answered questions about why he's not the guy (that off-balance, psycho throw was hideous). SEC teams will quickly gather that if he's in the game, he's running the ball 95% of the time. Doesn't make it any easier to defend, though.
Team answered questions about its mental makeup. Could have broken down after the fumble going in. Didn't. Converted drives for touchdowns and not field goals.
Team got stronger as the game wore on.
Defense made some stupid mistakes, but played well overall.
Last year I felt like shooting people after the opener. Especially the sunshine and unicorn phuks who couldn't see what was clearly obvious.
Today? I don't feel like shooting anything. It was an encouraging start. It's just one game, but it went about as well as it could have for Auburn.
Good start.
Agree with all of this. All we were looking for, without the bullshit of course.
-
Holy Crap Chop....I think you have now become the Master of the Quote Function, lol. Jumbo will be pleased, he has taught you well Grass Hoppa.
-
Burns answered questions about why he's not the guy (that off-balance, psycho throw was hideous). SEC teams will quickly gather that if he's in the game, he's running the ball 95% of the time. Doesn't make it any easier to defend, though.
Agree 100%. Had Burns been the starter, we might have won the game by 1 or 2 points. Could have lost it, too.
-
BWAAA HAAA HAAAA....
I figured. One game. One game in and some are already breaking their arms trying to pat themselves on the back.
I'll write later, but first let me laugh my phuking ass off at some of the knee jerk instant gratification phuks around here. One game is one game.
I'll also laugh heartily at the number today who are solidly on the Chizik bandwagon and calling for accountability when just a few days ago they were sitting so hard on the fence they've got splinters in their colon. Do people really think that nobody remembers anything they've ever said before? Meh. Whatever.
Quick observations?
Point differential between the first game this year and last is about the same. Quality of opponent is about the same. First half went about the same.
AU won 34-0 (if you remember) to open last season and the back patters (same ones basically) were poopting the floor giggling over how brilliant they were then, too. (How many rushing yards did we have in the season opener last year? 321?)
All that in the books? There were some differences. Last night was much better in terms of the little things. Todd still didn't look great, but he at least looked competent. He made several nice throws but he made some ridiculously bad ones, too.
The Sunday morning after the ULM game there were a thousand red flags flying and a dozen alarm bells ringing. There aren't as many flags today. And the bells are mostly quiet.
It was a fairly solid start. Todd answered questions about his arm strength if not his ability to be the quarterback. His decision-making was still a little sketchy, but the good news is that it seemed to get better as the game progressed. Looked like he gained half a season's worth of confidence.
Burns answered questions about why he's not the guy (that off-balance, psycho throw was hideous). SEC teams will quickly gather that if he's in the game, he's running the ball 95% of the time. Doesn't make it any easier to defend, though.
Team answered questions about its mental makeup. Could have broken down after the fumble going in. Didn't. Converted drives for touchdowns and not field goals.
Team got stronger as the game wore on.
Defense made some stupid mistakes, but played well overall.
Last year I felt like shooting people after the opener. Especially the sunshine and unicorn phuks who couldn't see what was clearly obvious.
Today? I don't feel like shooting anything. It was an encouraging start. It's just one game, but it went about as well as it could have for Auburn.
Good start.
Damn nice take considering the source. :thumbsup:
All last week had to listen bammers, and some media talking about how we'd lose this game, or at least not cover the spread. All from the same "y'all were bad last year and nothing's changed at Auburn" dumbass perspective. Things have changed. It was just one game though, but last year we'd have floundered around, dicked off, cried, and gotten worse as the game wore on. They played through adversity, and some bad calls made the penalty stats look worse than they should have. Turnovers won't do.
Todd completed 65% of his passes, threw a couple of very nice balls, and in general looked as I predicted...servicable. He'll only get better. How much remains to be seen...the OL helped him, and the running game a lot. Can they hold up against better SEC teams? The running game? Two 100 yard rushers...I don't care who it was...that's pretty good when you note we had 250 passing too. Even against such an opponent, 500 yards of total offense has been a long time coming at Auburn.
The bottom line...unlike last year, we handled lesser competition the way lesser competition should have been handled...the backups got some playing time at the end...and we covered by double digits. The atttitude was far different this year. If they improve like a team should, and stay healthy, this team will do better than 6 wins and the Weed Eater bowl. A couple of breaks and who knows?
Right now, I'm ok with what I saw in a season opener for the most part.
-
Damn nice take considering the source. :thumbsup:
All last week had to listen bammers, and some media talking about how we'd lose this game, or at least not cover the spread. All from the same "y'all were bad last year and nothing's changed at Auburn" dumbass perspective. Things have changed. It was just one game though, but last year we'd have floundered around, dicked off, cried, and gotten worse as the game wore on. They played through adversity, and some bad calls made the penalty stats look worse than they should have. Turnovers won't do.
Todd completed 65% of his passes, threw a couple of very nice balls, and in general looked as I predicted...servicable. He'll only get better. How much remains to be seen...the OL helped him, and the running game a lot. Can they hold up against better SEC teams? The running game? Two 100 yard rushers...I don't care who it was...that's pretty good when you note we had 250 passing too. Even against such an opponent, 500 yards of total offense has been a long time coming at Auburn.
The bottom line...unlike last year, we handled lesser competition the way lesser competition should have been handled...the backups got some playing time at the end...and we covered by double digits. The atttitude was far different this year. If they improve like a team should, and stay healthy, this team will do better than 6 wins and the Weed Eater bowl. A couple of breaks and who knows?
Right now, I'm ok with what I saw in a season opener for the most part.
^^^Bingo^^^
I'll add that I saw more energy on the sidelines, in the first game, than I saw ALL year last year. And I'm not just talking about Coach Chizik chewing on the refs ear after that Garbage PI call. I'm talking about Coach Malzahn getting into the Defensive Huddle, during timeouts. I'm talking about Coach Troop back bumpin' the Defensive players comin' off the field. I'm talkin' about Coach Malzahn getting up in Chris Todd's grill...not to curse him, but to ask him what he saw, what the coverage was...basically testing him, to see if he was making the right type of reads. Also, the Halftime adjustments was nice to see again. Todd under center for a few plays, was nice to see, especially the change of pace quick snap, while the Defense was suckin' wind.
-
Slow your roll, Chopper.
It was one game. A good win - yes, but it was one game.
I think Mississippi State is going to give us some trouble.
But it was a good way to start the year.
-
Slow your roll, Chopper.
It was one game. A good win - yes, but it was one game.
I think Mississippi State is going to give us some trouble.
But it was a good way to start the year.
Slow my roll?? I just asked for the opinion of people that were uber critical of Chizik. It wasn't a chest bump, or post to flame. I even AGREED with Kaos's assessment. Slow YOUR roll and pay fucking attention.
-
Slow my roll?? I just asked for the opinion of people that were uber critical of Chizik. It wasn't a chest bump, or post to flame. I even AGREED with Kaos's assessment. Slow YOUR roll and pay fucking attention.
I'm too broke to pay attention.
-
Slow my roll?? I just asked for the opinion of people that were uber critical of Chizik. It wasn't a chest bump, or post to flame. I even AGREED with Kaos's assessment. Slow YOUR roll and pay fucking attention.
Chill out. :cheers:
-
Slow my roll?? I just asked for the opinion of people that were uber critical of Chizik. It wasn't a chest bump, or post to flame. I even AGREED with Kaos's assessment. Slow YOUR roll and pay fucking attention.
Watch him. He's more concerned with terrorists and killing classmates than blowjobs.
-
Watch him. He's more concerned with terrorists and killing classmates than blowjobs.
All you can do is shake your head boar..... :sad:
...in other news, I just ate a 17 oz ribeye that I marinaded in a Smith & Wollensky sauce and a few other ingredients for a few hours... I have been to the top of Steak Mtn....and it is good.
That Smith & Wollensky shit is awesome! Highly recommend!!!!
-
I have chops in the oven now.
I'll have to try some of that sauce. Looks tasty.
-
All you can do is shake your head boar..... :sad:
...in other news, I just ate a 17 oz ribeye that I marinaded in a Smith & Wollensky sauce and a few other ingredients for a few hours... I have been to the top of Steak Mtn....and it is good.
That Smith & Wollensky shit is awesome! Highly recommend!!!!
Pics?
-
Pics?
Should have. It WAS beautiful! :vn:
Figured I'd eat something good tonight before I get back on the road in the morning and eat crap basically the rest of the week.
-
Fuck your Man vs. Food 17 oz. challenges. A 10 oz. filet dusted with the finest of powdered marinade from "The Cellar" in Dothan. Well, a Winn Dixie filet (The Cellar was closed) but dusted up right.
New potatoes cut up and sprinkled with garlic powder, onions, butter and swiss cheese, wrapped up tight and put in a grilling basket on the Weber for 35-40 minutes. Just cleaned up the kitcken, mixed up a fresh Knob Creek and Coke and here I am....conversing with you reprobates.
Damn, you guys are buzz killers.
-
I got all you faggots beat. 1 packet of chicken flavored Ramen Noodles and 2 grilled cheese with a Dr. Pepper. Beat that....you can't, so don't even try. I'm livin' high on the Hog.
-
I got all you faggots beat. 1 packet of chicken flavored Ramen Noodles and 2 grilled cheese with a Dr. Pepper. Beat that....you can't, so don't even try. I'm livin' high on the Hog.
Daayyyuuumm boy, has Food Network sent the contracts yet. Cause you gots culinary skillzz.
-
Daayyyuuumm boy, has Food Network sent the contracts yet. Cause you gots culinary skillzz.
Yeah, it's layin' on da table, somewhere. I just don't wanna spread my secret recepies, so I think I'm going to pass. Don't get me started on my Mac and Cheese with Grape Kool-aid to wash it down with.
-
Daayyyuuumm boy, has Food Network sent the contracts yet. Cause you gots culinary skillzz.
He eats it all out of a Pimp Cup. There is nothing higher.
-
He eats it all out of a Pimp Cup. There is nothing higher.
Did you really scarf down a 17 oz.er..?
What sides? That's a beefy butt steak.
-
His colon weeps.
-
Did you really scarf down a 17 oz.er..?
What sides? That's a beefy butt steak.
Yes. I did. I had some steamed veggies on the side (broccolli, rice...) It was fantastic.
In an ironic twist, I've got some of those Healthy Choice nuke and eat dinners in my bag for this week.
-
His colon weeps.
The steak will cleanse.
-
The steak will cleanse.
Son, you are spot on. Nothing like 15 pounds of undigested red meat to properly cleanse the colon. It's my motto.
-
Son, you are spot on. Nothing like 15 pounds of undigested red meat to properly cleanse the colon. It's my motto.
Meat's good for the ass?
-
Should have. It WAS beautiful! :vn:
Figured I'd eat something good tonight before I get back on the road in the morning and eat crap basically the rest of the week.
Have you checked out the Mohawk Tavern in Monroe yet? Or are you still travelling that route?
-
Screw you bitches.
A 64oz bag of skittles and knob creek on ice.
-
Screw you bitches.
A 64oz bag of skittles and knob creek on ice.
This man knows
-
This man knows
Taste the muthafuckin' rainbow.
-
Screw you bitches.
A 64oz bag of skittles and knob creek on ice.
Nice! FYI, Hot Tamales go good with Knob Creek as well.
-
Bitch....food makes me sick...a 750ml of Pyrat was downed on Sat. The only solids I had was the ice.
(http://mixdrinkipedia.com/_media/brand/rum/pyrat-rum-xo.jpg)
-
Back to the thread. The biggest change I feel between this year and last is that the team looked prepared, and we kept the foot on the necks of our opponent.
As for Chris Todd I will be the first to say that looking at this game he looks far improved over last year. Everyone was talking about the pump fake to Zach for 93 yards. While that was impressive and just as much T Zach as Todd I thought Todd's mos impressive pass was the TD to Darvin Adams in the back of the end zone with a defender in his face. Todd threw that ball about as perfect as you could.
-
Back to the thread. The biggest change I feel between this year and last is that the team looked prepared, and we kept the foot on the necks of our opponent.
As for Chris Todd I will be the first to say that looking at this game he looks far improved over last year. Everyone was talking about the pump fake to Zach for 93 yards. While that was impressive and just as much T Zach as Todd I thought Todd's mos impressive pass was the TD to Darvin Adams in the back of the end zone with a defender in his face. Todd threw that ball about as perfect as you could.
Agreed. There were plenty of pretty passes on his end.
ZERO 3-and-outs.
His passing percentage (I think it was like 65%) was nice, but would have been much nicer if some of our receivers had caught the balls that bounced out of their hands/chests a couple of times.
-
When Todd squared up to fake the out pattern, I was saying, "They need to stop throwing this same out pattern. It's beginning to be teh sux and.....OH HELL, HE'S WIDE OPEN"
Beauty, eh?
-
When Todd squared up to fake the out pattern, I was saying, "They need to stop throwing this same out pattern. It's beginning to be teh sux and.....OH HELL, HE'S WIDE OPEN"
Beauty, eh?
Watch this video, and watch both of their cornerbacks and a linebacker completely bite on the fake. I hate to admit it, but it makes me smile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm4k5Zbrga4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm4k5Zbrga4)
-
Taste the muthafuckin' rainbow.
yeah, and poop the muthafuckin rainbow for the next two days... red dye #5 will give you a real shock bright and early in the morning...
-
Watch this video, and watch both of their cornerbacks and a linebacker completely bite on the fake. I hate to admit it, but it makes me smile.
You know it's a good fake when the cameraman bites too...
-
You know it's a good fake when the cameraman bites too...
Let's not go overboard here. It was a cameraman working for the U which are usually locals and they were getting faked on handoffs.
-
Let's not go overboard here. It was a cameraman working for the U which are usually locals and they were getting faked on handoffs.
Leave me alone. I am on a roll...
-
Leave me alone. I am on a roll...
OK. In that case. You go girl.
-
OK. In that case. You go girl.
Welcome to 1993...don't forget to shake your moneymaker.
-
Welcome to 1993...don't forget to shake your moneymaker.
Whomp d'ere it is.
-
Whomp d'ere it is.
Oh yeah.... Tag Team in effect...
-
Whomp d'ere it is.
Raise the roof. Psyche!
-
Raise the roof. Psyche!
Haha...That was awesome! NOT
-
Umm...Sani, unless you were in the huddle on some of those fake handoffs, I'm pretty sure you were getting faked too. There was a couple times, I was cheering at Kodi, because I could've sworn he had taken the ball. I'm up in the stands, and I can't tell who had the ball some of the time, I'm pretty sure the Defense was having a hell of a time, trying to figure out who had the ball as Ontario blazed past them.
Also, I loved it when that commentator said...."Uh Oh".
Another thing, when Zachery scored, he was looking up at me and my step-brother, shakin' his head (we were sitting to the right of the guy in the blue jacket, one row up) because I was going bat shit crazy, basically elbowing everyone around me, while I was swingin' my arms around. That guy in the blue shirt had just turned around and told me that it was about to be a different ball game after they stopped us on that third and 4th attempt. He left not long after that TD.
Side Note: that guy was the former kicker for LaTech ('97-'99) yes that was the last two years that SPuat played Tech....and lost, lol. He also shared his Woodford with me and a dip of Copenhagen.
-
Watch this video, and watch both of their cornerbacks and a linebacker completely bite on the fake. I hate to admit it, but it makes me smile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm4k5Zbrga4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm4k5Zbrga4)
I cant believe you agree with me!
-
Umm...Sani, unless you were in the huddle on some of those fake handoffs, I'm pretty sure you were getting faked too. There was a couple times, I was cheering at Kodi, because I could've sworn he had taken the ball. I'm up in the stands, and I can't tell who had the ball some of the time, I'm pretty sure the Defense was having a hell of a time, trying to figure out who had the ball as Ontario blazed past them.
So what I am hearing is you do not need to be operating a camera for ESPN either. Maybe I missed my calling cause it has been very few times throughout the years when I was faked out, except for the hooker who said its name was Alice.....wait what?
-
So what I am hearing is you do not need to be operating a camera for ESPN either. Maybe I missed my calling cause it has been very few times throughout the years when I was faked out, except for the hooker who said its name was Alice.....wait what?
Her hands were the size of Andre the Giants
-
Al Ice sounds like a cool name.
-
Al Ice sounds like a cool name.
Alice A. Giant