Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Aubie16 on August 31, 2009, 08:57:12 AM

Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: Aubie16 on August 31, 2009, 08:57:12 AM
The writer of the article you posted from the Florence Newspaper conveniently left out some of Chizik's words, which left you confused.

Columbus Ledger-Inquirer Article

Quote
“I don’t know exactly where we are in that department,” Chizik said. "We’re trying to go enough of our first teams against each other, where we stay sharp in that department. Because that is a concern if you don’t do that."

“But there is a fine line with us doing too much of that versus doing too little of it. But I feel good with where we’re at. I still feel like our plan is smart.”

vs. Florence Times article

Quote
“I don’t know exactly where we are in that department,” Chizik said. "But I feel good with where we’re at. I still feel like our plan is smart.”

Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: Godfather on August 31, 2009, 09:04:26 AM
“I don’t know exactly where we are in that department,” Chizik said. "We’re trying to go enough of our first teams against each other, where we stay sharp in that department. Because that is a concern if you don’t do that."

“But there is a fine line with us doing too much of that versus doing too little of it. But I feel good with where we’re at. I still feel like our plan is smart.”


(http://donstuff.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/circular-reasoning1.jpg)
Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: AUChizad on August 31, 2009, 09:34:39 AM
(http://donstuff.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/circular-reasoning1.jpg)
He doesn't know exactly where they're at in the department of going 100% physical, due to lack of depth. However, they are trying to have first teams go against each other as much as possible. Therefore, he feels good with where they're at in the "fine line with doing too much of that versus doing too little of it."

I guess I'm just wildly interpreting what he said because I can read.
Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: Saniflush on August 31, 2009, 09:38:19 AM
He doesn't know exactly where they're at in the department of going 100% physical, due to lack of depth. However, they are trying to have first teams go against each other as much as possible. Therefore, he feels good with where they're at in the "fine line with doing too much of that versus doing too little of it."

I guess I'm just wildly interpreting what he said because I can read.

How dare you bring reading comprehension into this!
Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on August 31, 2009, 09:43:28 AM
I guess I'm just wildly interpreting what he said because I can read.

Exactly.
Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: Snaggletiger on August 31, 2009, 09:43:52 AM
He doesn't know exactly where they're at in the department of going 100% physical, due to lack of depth. However, they are trying to have first teams go against each other as much as possible. Therefore, he feels good with where they're at in the "fine line with doing too much of that versus doing too little of it."

I guess I'm just wildly interpreting what he said because I can read.

Balderdash!!!  Wild, speculative and irresponsible on your part.
Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: Godfather on August 31, 2009, 10:04:52 AM
He doesn't know exactly where they're at in the department of going 100% physical, due to lack of depth. However, they are trying to have first teams go against each other as much as possible. Therefore, he feels good with where they're at in the "fine line with doing too much of that versus doing too little of it."

I guess I'm just wildly interpreting what he said because I can read.
I understood what he said, that doesn't mean he wasn't talking in circles.
Title: Re: Chizik Just Confuses Me (Sensi)
Post by: Kaos on August 31, 2009, 11:23:06 AM
I understood what he said, that doesn't mean he wasn't talking in circles.

He talks a lot but rarely says much of value.   

Beyond the noted cliches, he says a lot of "I don't know where we are."  He also says things that contradict what his assistants say. 

He's either being purposely obtuse and vague which, depending on your position could be a good or a bad thing.

Or he really doesn't know, which, again, depending on your position could be either good or bad.