Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 08:31:29 AM

Title: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 08:31:29 AM
Perry, can you fill us in on the kid?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: JR4AU on July 12, 2009, 08:40:06 AM
Perry, can you fill us in on the kid?

Long and short of it is: If he's a 3 star, all the bamtards will prance around saying that's all Auburn can get, if he's any higher rated, it will be tales of how he's overrated, and after camps and such will drop to a three star, and of course the standard fare of "Bammer never offered him, and wouldn't, or we'd have him".  Sound about right?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 09:36:09 AM
Quote
Long and short of it is: If he's a 3 star, all the bamtards will prance around saying that's all Auburn can get, if he's any higher rated, it will be tales of how he's overrated, and after camps and such will drop to a three star, and of course the standard fare of "Bammer never offered him, and wouldn't, or we'd have him".  Sound about right?

Am I to take from this that you weren't aware of your new commit?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 09:54:05 AM
I take it that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 10:07:19 AM
Quote
I take it that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

That's odd, two responses now and still nobody willing to provide any information on the commit.  Perry, how many grillz does this one have?

I figured there would be a little more fanfare for Auburn's first commit of July.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Argo on July 12, 2009, 10:25:33 AM
With all due respect Birmingham, if you are wondering about a current commit, you should probably check the recruiting forum first.  Perry says 5 grillz, with a chance for 6 depending on this fall.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 10:45:22 AM
Damnit Argo, I was going to see how long it took for B'ham to realize it.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 10:55:48 AM
DE Joel Bonomolo
height: 6'3"
weight: 245lbs
FORTY: 4.65
offers from: Arizona, Arizona State, Auburn, San Diego State, Utah, Washington.

Scout: 1 star

Rivals: 0 stars

ProwlerPerry: 5 Grillz

You don't suppose that one of the 3 unbiased opinions stated above might be struggling a bit with his ongoing battle of being a delusional homer, do you?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 11:10:08 AM
BTW, B'ham...most of the JUCOs haven't been rated yet by any of the recruiting sites.  Keep trying.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 11:19:56 AM
BTW, B'ham...most of the JUCOs haven't been rated yet by any of the recruiting sites.  Keep trying.

Keep trying what?  All I gave is the rating you provided along with his offer list.  What am I supposed to be trying? 
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: JR4AU on July 12, 2009, 11:41:24 AM
Am I to take from this that you weren't aware of your new commit?

Though I don't jack off to Rivals front page every day like most bammers...I am, and was aware...to the point that I understand it's not official yet, but a high likelyhood.  And he's not a 0 star...he's yet unrated rivals you idiot fuck.  Thanks for your concern and interest in Auburn football and recruiting...do you follow bammer football?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 11:47:51 AM
Quote
Though I don't jack off to Rivals front page every day like most bammers...I am, and was aware...to the point that I understand it's not official yet, but a high likelyhood.  And he's not a 0 star...he's yet unrated rivals you idiot fuck.  Thanks for your concern and interest in Auburn football and recruiting...do you follow bammer football?

I noticed you didn't say anything about his 1 star rating from Scouts.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: JR4AU on July 12, 2009, 11:57:09 AM
I noticed you didn't say anything about his 1 star rating from Scouts.

JUCOs are usually the last to be rated....but like I said in my initial response, your typical bammer idiocy is showing.  Fuck off! 
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 12:12:53 PM
Quote
JUCOs are usually the last to be rated....but like I said in my initial response, your typical bammer idiocy is showing.  Fuck off!


Yeah you're right, he's probably a bad ass.  That's why it's like pulling teeth to try and get any of you to talk about him without being defensive and why nobody has responded to the thread on the recruiting board.  You guys are thrilled about this commit and I'm just an ignorant bammer who is throwing shit against the wall hoping something will stick.  You stole a solid commit from San Diego State who has as many allegations of steroid abuse as Ivan Drago.  You're pumped over this 5 grillz stud!
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: AUChizad on July 12, 2009, 12:40:50 PM
I noticed you didn't say anything about his 1 star rating from Scouts.
Scout defaults recruits as a 1 star before assessing them just like Rivals defaults them as zero, dipshit.

That kid's a an absolute beast and you think he averages 1/2 a star?

You act as is that offer list is an utter joke. Refresh my memory. How did your All-World-beating 13th MNC team fare against Utah? Not to mention you left off several other offers including UCLA or that LSU & Arky are interested.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 12:52:39 PM
Quote
Not to mention you left off several other offers including UCLA or that LSU & Arky are interested.

So we're listing teams that are interested now?  Sweet.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 01:13:33 PM
65 Tackles 18 TFL and 121/2 Sacks, as a Freshman in JUCO, doesn't sound too shabby, also he was on the All-Conference Team to boot. Keep trying bammer.  Because this guy is a Stud.  Here ya go B'ham, this'll help you out....Extremely high motor, something similar to David Pollack.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPUNtH2SWtA&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Etigersx%2Ecom%2Fforum%2Findex%2Ephp%3Ftopic%3D6082%2E0&feature=player_embedded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPUNtH2SWtA&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Etigersx%2Ecom%2Fforum%2Findex%2Ephp%3Ftopic%3D6082%2E0&feature=player_embedded)
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 01:52:53 PM
Quote
65 Tackles 18 TFL and 121/2 Sacks, as a Freshman in JUCO, doesn't sound too shabby, also he was on the All-Conference Team to boot. Keep trying bammer.  Because this guy is a Stud.  Here ya go B'ham, this'll help you out....Extremely high motor, something similar to David Pollack.

Funny what steroids will do.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 01:56:16 PM
Yeah look what it did for Andre Smith....Man Boobs.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Argo on July 12, 2009, 02:19:05 PM
I personally have no idea how good the kid is.  I haven't watched any video of him, not even the youtube video that Prowler posted.  I will say this, however.  If an extremely overweight nose tackle from JUCO can come into a program, work his tail off, and immediately have in impact on a team the way Cody did for us last fall, I don't think it's a stretch to say that Bonomolo COULD upgrade the Tigers defense next year. 

Therefore, why is this topic already heading for 3-5 pages?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 02:33:45 PM
Quote
Therefore, why is this topic already heading for 3-5 pages?

Mostly because, for some reason, folks around here became sensitive and defensive while rambling through the normal name calling.  I would have assumed the first responses would have been very positive and upbeat.  I for one am surprised.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Argo on July 12, 2009, 03:04:35 PM
I would have assumed the first responses would have been very positive and upbeat.  I for one am surprised.

Honestly, after this post...

Quote
Long and short of it is: If he's a 3 star, all the bamtards will prance around saying that's all Auburn can get, if he's any higher rated, it will be tales of how he's overrated, and after camps and such will drop to a three star, and of course the standard fare of "Bammer never offered him, and wouldn't, or we'd have him".  Sound about right?

I figured the thread was dead.  I mean, he swam up and ripped the lure right off your line.  How you were able to pull in another page and a half of responses is actually shocking to me.  You're a hell of a fisherman, B'Ham.  I'll give you that.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 03:10:08 PM
Mostly because, for some reason, folks around here became sensitive and defensive while rambling through the normal name calling.  I would have assumed the first responses would have been very positive and upbeat.  I for one am surprised.
Because you came in bashing him without fuckin' knowing that he hasn't been rated, you try to make fun of the schools that have offered him,  you go onto say that I'm a homer because I gave him 5 Grillz while Rivals has him as a no star.  Then, you try to stay oh....uh, steriods will do that for you.  First off, you don't have a clue if he has or hasn't taken 'roids.  Secondly, steriods doesn't do shit "for you".  Keep trying
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 03:15:58 PM
Quote
Secondly, steriods doesn't do shit "for you".

I agree with this statement.

signed,
Barry Bonds
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: JR4AU on July 12, 2009, 03:36:48 PM
So we're listing teams that are interested now?  Sweet.

You listed a partial list you fuckstick!  Left off AZ, AZ State, Wash.

And your steroid cracks?  You don't personally know any former SEC players do you?  If you did you wouldn't be talking that line of shit.  They're everywhere dumbshit.  Including bammer!

Either you were too fucking stupid to find the recruiting forum, or you just wanted to talk shit...I suspect both actually.  If YOU wanted info on him, you can find your way to rivals and look him, as you seem to have.  You fuckers are too transparent, and full of the same line of recruiting bullshit.  Get lost asswipe.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: JR4AU on July 12, 2009, 03:38:46 PM
Mostly because, for some reason, folks around here became sensitive and defensive while rambling through the normal name calling.  I would have assumed the first responses would have been very positive and upbeat.  I for one am surprised.

Mere response to the standard bullshit about recruiting from bammers isn't defensive and sensitive, however, showing up on your rivals forum to run down every commitment sure seems to be.  Like I said, standard issue bammer babble. 
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 03:44:26 PM
Quote
You listed a partial list you fuckstick!  Left off AZ, AZ State, Wash.

Not sure if you're having trouble reading or what's going on.  Whatever the case is, I certainly didn't leave off AZ, AZ state or Washington.

As for UCLA, Rivals nor Scout have them offering him.  They may very well have offered him but it's not on Rivals or Scout. 
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 06:57:57 PM
Not sure if you're having trouble reading or what's going on.  Whatever the case is, I certainly didn't leave off AZ, AZ state or Washington.

As for UCLA, Rivals nor Scout have them offering him.  They may very well have offered him but it's not on Rivals or Scout. 

Per Scout....
Quote
Currently holding offers from Auburn, Arizona, Washington, Iowa State, Utah, San Diego State, UCLA and Nevada among others with Arkansas and LSU also showing a lot of interest, Bonomolo says that his visit this weekend may put an end to his recruiting even though he’s got plenty of options

Keep trying......
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 07:25:17 PM
They don't have it on his page.  You'd figure they would include UCLA to this list.
(http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii262/countrybdp/Untitled-11.jpg)
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 07:40:56 PM
It's because Scout only list the prospect's top 7 schools of interest.  Notice they don't have Iowa State's offer on his list either, eventhough Bono recently listed Iowa State as one of his top 3.  They also don't have Nevada on that list either, so I guess Bono doesn't have an offer from them either, hmmm?

Keep trying....
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 07:45:09 PM
Quote
It's because Scout only list the prospect's top 7 schools of interest.  Notice they don't have Iowa State's offer on his list either, eventhough Bono recently listed Iowa State as one of his top 3.  They also don't have Baylor or Nevada on that list either, so I guess Bono doesn't have an offer from them either, hmmm?

Keep trying....

If I was trying to manipulate his offer list wouldn't I have included Iowa State, Baylor and Nevada instead of excluding them with UCLA?  Calm down, perry.  You're gonna hurt something.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 07:54:59 PM
If I was trying to manipulate his offer list wouldn't I have included Iowa State, Baylor and Nevada instead of excluding them with UCLA?  Calm down, perry.  You're gonna hurt something.
It seems you should do a little more background checking, before you go around shooting off your mouth.  You should've learned that when AUChizad shut your mouth up about the zero stars and the one star ratings that Rivals and Scout have given him.  Here's what AUChizad did when he posted this....

Scout defaults recruits as a 1 star before assessing them just like Rivals defaults them as zero, dipshit.

That kid's a an absolute beast and you think he averages 1/2 a star?

You act as is that offer list is an utter joke. Refresh my memory. How did your All-World-beating 13th MNC team fare against Utah? Not to mention you left off several other offers including UCLA or that LSU & Arky are interested.

(http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/1812/hendo.gif)
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 08:00:15 PM
Quote
It seems you should do a little more background checking, before you go around shooting off your mouth.

(http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii262/countrybdp/Pot_Calling_the_Kettle_Black_T-Shir.gif)
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: The Prowler on July 12, 2009, 08:11:06 PM
And...here's what I keep doing to you,  :rofl: whenever I correct your posts.

(http://i25.tinypic.com/20fer6h.gif)
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: RWS on July 12, 2009, 08:21:31 PM
And...here's what I keep doing to you,  :rofl: whenever I correct your posts.

(http://i25.tinypic.com/20fer6h.gif)
I was going to post that you two need to fuck and get it over with, but it seems like with all these posts of men on top of each other, you are suggesting the same.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 12, 2009, 09:00:00 PM
So, to be accurate, here is his offer list.  Do you have anybody to add to the list, Perry?

UCLA
Iowa State
Baylor
Nevada
Arizona
Arizona State
Auburn
San Diego State
Utah
Washington
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Kaos on July 12, 2009, 09:06:46 PM

Yippetee Yap

You reek of cheese, fuckbag.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Townhallsavoy on July 12, 2009, 11:58:57 PM
Worst thread in TigersX history. 
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Ogre on July 13, 2009, 09:06:56 AM
Worst thread in TigersX history. 

This is an achievement that should be celebrated!  I mean, we've had some pretty shit-tacular threads on here. 
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Birmingham on July 13, 2009, 04:01:35 PM
Worst thread in TigersX history. 

Sorry, I can think of much worse.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: AWK on July 13, 2009, 06:21:22 PM
I temporarily stopped fucking sandpaper to check out this thread...then I immediately returned to the fucking.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Jumbo on July 14, 2009, 02:40:07 AM
I temporarily stopped fucking sandpaper to check out this thread...then I immediately returned to the fucking.
Thats how you break it off smooth.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Godfather on July 14, 2009, 10:03:47 AM
Sorry, I can think of much worse.
I dunno this one is at least top 5
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Buzz Killington on July 14, 2009, 10:22:17 AM
I temporarily stopped fucking sandpaper to check out this thread...then I immediately returned to the fucking.

200 grit, or the rough stuff?
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Saniflush on July 14, 2009, 10:33:59 AM
200 grit, or the rough stuff?

I think it was a drum on a dremel with 80 grit.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: Buzz Killington on July 14, 2009, 10:56:20 AM
I think it was a drum on a dremel with 80 grit.

Ooh...that's my favori...I mean, Ooh.
Title: Re: No thread on the new Auburn commit?
Post by: AWK on July 14, 2009, 12:19:21 PM
Sani knows how to roll, we are not pussies.