Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Buzz Killington on December 05, 2008, 09:41:48 AM
-
His name has come up a lot this morning.
1) Do you think he would leave GT after just one season?
2) Would that system work at Auburn?
I'll hang up and listen.
-
His name has come up a lot this morning.
1) Do you think he would leave GT after just one season?
2) Would that system work at Auburn?
I'll hang up and listen.
maybe and yes.
I do not discount anything happening with people coming and going anymore.
Not sure I would be REAL excited about that offense at Auburn but yes I think it could work with him.
-
Don't know.
Not sure.
I don't want that kind of offense personally. It may sound stupid, but it is just kind of boring. I don't think the offense can be good enough to be a consistent winner in the SEC. I could be wrong, I am not going to pull a Kaos and tell the world Auburn is doomed if we hire the dude or anything.... :flag:
-
Don't know and yes.
People say that the triple option is outdated. What they should say is that it is out of fashion. Coaching in college and the NFL is the biggest "me too" bunch of follow the leadering there is outside of politics and Hollywood. The triple option would work at Auburn for Johnson, just as well as it worked everywhere else he has been.
-
Sure he'd come if the money was right. Yes it probably would work at AU. No, I could not watch AU games anymore, because that is some boring shit. I tried to watch GT a couple of times this year, and was bored to tears with that offense.
-
Sure he'd come if the money was right. Yes it probably would work at AU. No, I could not watch AU games anymore, because that is some boring shit. I tried to watch GT a couple of times this year, and was bored to tears with that offense.
I love watching the triple option. When it is hitting on all cylinders I don't think there is a more explosive offense out there. Did you not watch Nebraska in the mid 90's? Leading O in the country averaging 50 pts a game? How can that be boring? Watching a coach run the spread dumping off 5 yard passes 50 times a game is boring. Watching Stacy Danley run off tack 50 times a game for 3 ypc was boring (yet effective). It was more exciting when we threw the ball to Stacy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxviraByR4w (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxviraByR4w)
-
I love watching the triple option. When it is hitting on all cylinders I don't think there is a more explosive offense out there. Did you not watch Nebraska in the mid 90's? Leading O in the country averaging 50 pts a game? How can that be boring? Watching a coach run the spread dumping off 5 yard passes 50 times a game is boring. Watching Stacy Danley run off tack 50 times a game for 3 ypc was boring (yet effective). It was more exciting when we threw the ball to Stacy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxviraByR4w (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxviraByR4w)
Nebraska? I thought we were talking about Paul Johnson and his Navy/GT offense.
-
1. If the money's right
2. I don't know
Next Caller.......Charles from Reeltown.........
-
It absolutely boggles my mind that anybody can watch Paul Johnson's option and be bored. It is the most fluent beautiful offense in college football when ran the way Paul Johnson runs it. It is absolutely fantastic to watch a running game beat the shit out of a defense that knows exactly what play is coming and still can't do anything about it.
-
HERE! HERE!
-
It absolutely boggles my mind that anybody can watch Paul Johnson's option and be bored. It is the most fluent beautiful offense in college football when ran the way Paul Johnson runs it. It is absolutely fantastic to watch a running game beat the shit out of a defense that knows exactly what play is coming and still can't do anything about it.
Fluent? You mean that shit speaks to you while you watch it? Man you must be some kinda offensive guru. :rofl:
-
Main Entry: flu·ent
Pronunciation: \ˈflü-ənt\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin fluent-, fluens, present participle of fluere — more at fluid
Date: 1585
1 a: capable of flowing : fluid b: capable of moving with ease and grace <the fluent body of a dancer>
2 a: capable of using a language easily and accurately <fluent in Spanish> <a fluent writer> b: effortlessly smooth and flowing : polished <a fluent performance> <spoke in fluent English> c: having or showing mastery of a subject or skill <fluent in mathematics
Fluent? You mean that shit speaks to you while you watch it? Man you must be some kinda offensive guru. :rofl:
Dumbass, you might want to look up the definitions of words before you make comments. Even if he is a Bammer he was correct in his usage.
-
Fluent? You mean that shit speaks to you while you watch it? Man you must be some kinda offensive guru. :rofl:
(http://www.shipmentoffail.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bikephotofail.jpg)
-
Fluent? You mean that shit speaks to you while you watch it? Man you must be some kinda offensive guru. :rofl:
(http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g242/glenn1964/FAIL-2.gif)
-
Fluent? You mean that shit speaks to you while you watch it? Man you must be some kinda offensive guru. :rofl:
(http://banjo.macrochan.org/source/K/C/KC35K3YOWIBU4P3QBM25XZKJ32EAQXKZ.gif)
-
She hurled a whiskey bottle at me and that thang flew..went right past mah head.