Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
The Library => Haley Center Basement => Topic started by: CCTAU on May 04, 2018, 11:58:22 AM
-
And this:
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31880622_1001304643367487_5287869013626454016_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=da2e6edf2371e8d21e6f8f27bbc6c24c&oe=5B94C949)
-
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31906408_581804285539301_6067759186802900992_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=a4dc52c64391008fbe77c1db86404acc&oe=5B8E2B15)
-
From the Daily Wire dot I am a gay twerker that has no balls!!!! I also have no idea how to use the quote function to post stories, so I annoy the piss out of others. I like male genatalia in and around my mouth.
Last year, Harvard University took the unprecedented step of banning on- and off-campus single-gender organizations. The ban targeted sororities and fraternities, but also "unrecognized single-gender social organizations" called "Finals Clubs" that served as gathering places for the school's legacy students.
In early February, after several rounds of appeals, the school finalized the ban — but, because of a campus-wide outcry from feminists, only leaders and members of "male-focused" single-gender clubs will face repercussions from Harvard's administration.
According to Harvard (https://reason.com/blog/2018/02/05/harvard-reaffirms-ban-on-single-sex-orga), the single-gender clubs "propagated exclusionary values" and maintained "forms of privilege" that the school found distasteful and outdated. Those who remain in such clubs, reports Reason Magazine, risk being barred "from leadership positions, athletic teams, and scholarships."
In December, Harvard finalized the policy, but women at Harvard immediately protested (http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/5/10/women-oppose-sanctions/) because the single-sex ban was supposed to come down only on those organizations that represented "privilege" — and there's no way an eternally oppressed, female-only organization at an Ivy League school, made up entirely of the gender-underprivileged, could ever be a place of exclusivity, elitism, and classism.
The Harvard Administration listened, and so while the heads and members of male-only groups will be subject to immediate punishment under the policy, women's groups will have five years to come up with ways to comply with the new rules. Until then, they can call themselves "female-focused" and be considered to be in line with the policy change.
According to Harvard, of course, the ban may not last those five years — it's due to come up for review right before the women's groups will be required to submit a proof of change, and the administration could easily extend their "grace period" indefinitely.
A few prestigious "finals clubs" are also lawyering up (http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/9/13/fly-retains-legal-counsel-silverglate/), preparing to sue the school under the theory that Harvard is unnecessarily burdening students' right to free association, and that Harvard cannot punish members of clubs that don't officially exist on Harvard's campus.
-
You elitist masculine bastard YOU!
-
You elitist masculine bastard YOU!
I'm rich and buff.
-
I was kicked out of the Boy Scouts.
Eating Brownies.
-
I was kicked out of the Boy Scouts.
Eating Brownies.
I thought they had background checks for Troop leaders?
-
The stated reason for the change was declining membership. They need numbers and it makes zero fucking sense to exclude half the populace.
-
The stated reason for the change was declining membership. They need numbers and it makes zero fucking sense to exclude half the populace.
How did you become so ridiculously gullible?
It baffles me, it really does.
-
The stated reason for the change was declining membership. They need numbers and it makes zero fucking sense to exclude half the populace.
Wow.
-
Mea culpa.
I caught part of this piece on NPR and mistook what I heard.
A decision which the Boy Scouts' statement calls historic was not unexpected. It comes in response to, quote, "years of receiving requests from families and girls."
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/12/557298117/boy-scouts-to-admit-girls
-
Mea culpa.
I caught part of this piece on NPR and mistook what I heard.
A decision which the Boy Scouts' statement calls historic was not unexpected. It comes in response to, quote, "years of receiving requests from families and girls."
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/12/557298117/boy-scouts-to-admit-girls
And yet before you heard the rest, you DEFENDED that nonsense.
-
Mea culpa.
I caught part of this piece on NPR and mistook what I heard.
A decision which the Boy Scouts' statement calls historic was not unexpected. It comes in response to, quote, "years of receiving requests from families and girls."
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/12/557298117/boy-scouts-to-admit-girls
I didn’t know transgender boys weren’t allowed in before this past Jan.
Weren’t you in the Boy Scouts, Wes?
-
I was in the Cub Scouts. I got cheated in the Pinewood Derby by Peter Davidson. There was no question his dad made his car and I'm sure the front end was weighted.
Damn you, Peter.
-
I was in the Cub Scouts. I got cheated in the Pinewood Derby by Peter Davidson. There was no question his dad made his car and I'm sure the front end was weighted.
Damn you, Peter.
Where can I get some dam bait?
-
And yet before you heard the rest, you DEFENDED that nonsense.
The Boy Scouts' decline also started way before now. And had nothing to do with excluding half the populace. It ran a direct parallel to OTHER bad decisions they've made the last 10-15 years.
-
The Boy Scouts' decline also started way before now. And had nothing to do with excluding half the populace. It ran a direct parallel to OTHER bad decisions they've made the last 10-15 years.
Yep.
Letting girls in is just another stupid move that will lead to the end.
You don't want to hear this wes, but it's true. BSA was an organization based on Christian principles and often had a Christian base (met in churches, etc.).
To pander to the minority, the BSA began to leave some of that behind and/or disavow it.
Admit openly gay scouts? Membership declines by about 10%.
Allow openly gay scoutmasters? Another precipitous drop in membership. Hundreds of thousands.
The Girl Scouts are no better. They've lost more than half a million members since the leadership swung decidedly liberal. Embrace abortion? Support PP? Watch membership evaporate.
That's what you continually fail to understand. Your politics are hardly those of the majority. Despite the raucous noise the left makes, it's not what most people want.
"Inclusion" is wrong. Every "good hearted" liberal idea/ideal I've ever seen in practice is an utter failure. It cannot be sustained. It does not promote excellence or personal accountability. It's wrong now and it's always been wrong.
-
This decision doesn’t surprise me.
Even out of the posters here on the x, I believe that Chizad, Wes and Token were all in the Boy Scouts.
So, they’ve actually been letting pussies in for years.
-
Yep.
Letting girls in is just another stupid move that will lead to the end.
You don't want to hear this wes, but it's true. BSA was an organization based on Christian principles and often had a Christian base (met in churches, etc.).
To pander to the minority, the BSA began to leave some of that behind and/or disavow it.
Admit openly gay scouts? Membership declines by about 10%.
Allow openly gay scoutmasters? Another precipitous drop in membership. Hundreds of thousands.
The Girl Scouts are no better. They've lost more than half a million members since the leadership swung decidedly liberal. Embrace abortion? Support PP? Watch membership evaporate.
That's what you continually fail to understand. Your politics are hardly those of the majority. Despite the raucous noise the left makes, it's not what most people want.
"Inclusion" is wrong. Every "good hearted" liberal idea/ideal I've ever seen in practice is an utter failure. It cannot be sustained. It does not promote excellence or personal accountability. It's wrong now and it's always been wrong.
Kumbaya and feelings aren't good policy?
-
Yep.
Letting girls in is just another stupid move that will lead to the end.
You don't want to hear this wes, but it's true. BSA was an organization based on Christian principles and often had a Christian base (met in churches, etc.).
To pander to the minority, the BSA began to leave some of that behind and/or disavow it.
Admit openly gay scouts? Membership declines by about 10%.
Allow openly gay scoutmasters? Another precipitous drop in membership. Hundreds of thousands.
The Girl Scouts are no better. They've lost more than half a million members since the leadership swung decidedly liberal. Embrace abortion? Support PP? Watch membership evaporate.
That's what you continually fail to understand. Your politics are hardly those of the majority. Despite the raucous noise the left makes, it's not what most people want.
"Inclusion" is wrong. Every "good hearted" liberal idea/ideal I've ever seen in practice is an utter failure. It cannot be sustained. It does not promote excellence or personal accountability. It's wrong now and it's always been wrong.
I swear, sometimes you write so pretty that you make me have dirty thoughts. About you and I.
You have any days you’re free for lunch, anytime soon?
-
The Mormons have told the Boy Scouts to go fuck themselves. This wasn't a surprise. This will be a huge financial hit to the It Scouts of America.
It's a shame this organization caved to the left.