Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: Kaos on January 24, 2018, 09:36:19 PM

Title: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 24, 2018, 09:36:19 PM
Trump sucks!  Didn't work.
Trump said grab 'em!  Didn't work.
Trump is racist! Didn't work.
Trump watched Xena! Didn't work.
Trump missed his gyn!  Didn't work.
Trump hates women! Didn't work.
Trump colluded! Didn't work.
Elect him and the economy will crash!  Didn't work.
Trump paid a hooker! Didn't work.

The current tack seems to be "everything's so much better, but Trump still SUCKS!"   We're supposed to ignore the signs of a flourishing economy, ignore the general feeling of confidence and whine and cry because Trump isn't a regular politician and he's a big orange meanie. 

I saw an article recently bashing Trump over how many people felt the country was headed in the wrong direction.  What the stupid article didn't mention is that the numbers aren't that much different than during Obama's term.

Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 24, 2018, 09:53:08 PM
Trump sucks!  Didn't work.
Trump said grab 'em!  Didn't work.
Trump is racist! Didn't work.
Trump watched Xena! Didn't work.
Trump missed his gyn!  Didn't work.
Trump hates women! Didn't work.
Trump colluded! Didn't work.
Elect him and the economy will crash!  Didn't work.
Trump paid a hooker! Didn't work.

The current tack seems to be "everything's so much better, but Trump still SUCKS!"   We're supposed to ignore the signs of a flourishing economy, ignore the general feeling of confidence and whine and cry because Trump isn't a regular politician and he's a big orange meanie. 

I saw an article recently bashing Trump over how many people felt the country was headed in the wrong direction.  What the stupid article didn't mention is that the numbers aren't that much different than during Obama's term.
What part of ongoing investigation are you failing to understand? Like I said last year, calling Robert Mueller "thorough" is an understatement.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 24, 2018, 09:53:47 PM
What part of ongoing investigation are you failing to understand? Like I said last year, calling Robert Mueller "thorough" is an understatement.

What part of "amounts to nothing" are you unable to understand?
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 24, 2018, 10:09:53 PM
Holy shit!  The tables are turning quickly.  The "Investigators" are about to be investigated.  How corrupt can you be?  This makes Watergate look like little Mikey cheating off Susie's paper on a 6th grade math pop quiz.     
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: GH2001 on January 24, 2018, 10:21:10 PM
What part of ongoing investigation are you failing to understand? Like I said last year, calling Robert Mueller "thorough" is an understatement.

Oh there's about to be an ongoing investigation involving mueller alright. And McCabe. And rosenstein. And page. And strzok.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 24, 2018, 10:26:24 PM
And strzok.

I'd like to buy a vowel, Pat.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: GH2001 on January 24, 2018, 10:34:43 PM
I'd like to buy a vowel, Pat.


Oooooooh. K is racist against people of....uhhh ummm... Eastern European descent?
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: CCTAU on January 24, 2018, 10:51:39 PM
What part of ongoing investigation are you failing to understand? Like I said last year, calling Robert Mueller "thorough" is an understatement.


Underaged hookers and blow, baby!
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 25, 2018, 04:33:25 PM
"amounts to nothing"
Says you. Just because all of the findings haven't been laid out yet, doesn't mean there's "nothing".
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 25, 2018, 08:32:27 PM
Now it has come to light, the White House Counsel threatened to quit instead of firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller under the request of Trump last June. So, the stable genius that Trump is tried to obstruct the investigation into his obstruction of justice and Russia investigation.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html?mtrref=undefined&referer=http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/25/politics/donald-trump-robert-mueller/index.html?sr=fbCNN012518donald-trump-robert-mueller0838PMStoryLink
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 25, 2018, 09:19:58 PM
Uuuuhhh...the NY Times?  Seriously?  What a deflection.  The investigators are about to go to jail.  In bunches.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 25, 2018, 09:43:52 PM
Now it has come to light, the White House Counsel threatened to quit instead of firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller under the request of Trump last June. So, the stable genius that Trump is tried to obstruct the investigation into his obstruction of justice and Russia investigation.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html?mtrref=undefined&referer=http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/25/politics/donald-trump-robert-mueller/index.html?sr=fbCNN012518donald-trump-robert-mueller0838PMStoryLink

Fake news!
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: GH2001 on January 26, 2018, 07:39:56 AM
Uuuuhhh...the NY Times?  Seriously?  What a deflection.  The investigators are about to go to jail.  In bunches.

Prowler has been educated by the university of googleZ and huffington com-post. He's pre law now. Specializing in federal probes.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 26, 2018, 07:47:42 AM
Now it has come to light, the White House Counsel threatened to quit instead of firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller under the request of Trump last June. So, the stable genius that Trump is tried to obstruct the investigation into his obstruction of justice and Russia investigation.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html?mtrref=undefined&referer=http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/25/politics/donald-trump-robert-mueller/index.html?sr=fbCNN012518donald-trump-robert-mueller0838PMStoryLink

Even if this were exactly as reported, what's the damn problem? 

Our president thought this guy had serious enough conflicts of interest (he does) that he could not be impartial (he can't).  His first thought (the right one) was to remove the guy and bring in somebody with less bias.  Members of his staff and other advisors discussed it with him and in those discussions convinced him that firing this assclown would create more problems than it would solve. 

You fucking triggered dumbasses.  That's how the process is supposed to work. 

Nothing to see here at all. 
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: GH2001 on January 26, 2018, 07:55:45 AM
Even if this were exactly as reported, what's the damn problem? 

Our president thought this guy had serious enough conflicts of interest (he does) that he could not be impartial (he can't).  His first thought (the right one) was to remove the guy and bring in somebody with less bias.  Members of his staff and other advisors discussed it with him and in those discussions convinced him that firing this assclown would create more problems than it would solve. 

You fucking triggered dumbasses.  That's how the process is supposed to work. 

Nothing to see here at all.

I hope he has decided not to breed.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 26, 2018, 07:58:19 AM
I hope he has decided not to breed.

That choice will likely be made for him.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 26, 2018, 04:32:58 PM
Even if this were exactly as reported, what's the damn problem? 

Our president thought this guy had serious enough conflicts of interest (he does) that he could not be impartial (he can't).  His first thought (the right one) was to remove the guy and bring in somebody with less bias.  Members of his staff and other advisors discussed it with him and in those discussions convinced him that firing this assclown would create more problems than it would solve. 

You fucking triggered dumbasses.  That's how the process is supposed to work. 

Nothing to see here at all.
Well, let's see if you can look at this without your red colored glasses...he fired James Comey "for the Russia stuff, no more problems with that" and then a month later tried to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller (R). Not that hard to see unless you're intentionally not wanting to look.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 26, 2018, 05:00:11 PM
Well, let's see if you can look at this without your red colored glasses...he fired James Comey "for the Russia stuff, no more problems with that" and then a month later tried to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller (R). Not that hard to see unless you're intentionally not wanting to look.

You're a stupid triggered twat.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 26, 2018, 05:01:23 PM
You're a stupid triggered twat.

I like triggering twat.  Diddling clit, too.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 26, 2018, 05:03:44 PM
Fake news!
Wrong. Just because it's not favorable news, doesn't mean it's fake. Try again.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 26, 2018, 05:04:54 PM
You're a stupid triggered twat.
^^This coming from someone that gets triggered over polls and ESPN 30 for 30 shows^^
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: War Eagle!!! on January 27, 2018, 10:27:18 AM
Well, let's see if you can look at this without your red colored glasses...he fired James Comey "for the Russia stuff, no more problems with that" and then a month later tried to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller (R). Not that hard to see unless you're intentionally not wanting to look.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/5dffa6d7387e6ecac25c42a95151ab2a/tenor.gif?itemid=6086195)
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 28, 2018, 03:09:47 PM
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/5dffa6d7387e6ecac25c42a95151ab2a/tenor.gif?itemid=6086195)
Trump has also discussed firing the assistant AG (the guy responsible for the Special Counsel).

Again, not that hard to see...unless you don't want to look.

Eventually, y'all will say, "so what if he colluded with Russia to win the election. So what if he tried on three separate occasions to obstruct justice. So what if he fucked two prostitutes and had them piss all over the bed (Yes, this happened)...etc."

If Obama did what Trump did, would everyone here be saying the same thing?
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Kaos on January 28, 2018, 04:28:07 PM
Trump has also discussed firing the assistant AG (the guy responsible for the Special Counsel).

Again, not that hard to see...unless you don't want to look.

Eventually, y'all will say, "so what if he colluded with Russia to win the election. So what if he tried on three separate occasions to obstruct justice. So what if he fucked two prostitutes and had them piss all over the bed (Yes, this happened)...etc."

If Obama did what Trump did, would everyone here be saying the same thing?

Obama did and will do worse. 

We didn’t come here every day and cry like spoiled little bitches.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 28, 2018, 08:10:42 PM
I've asked this question before.  And I don't ask from a pro-Trump standpoint.  Genuinely asking.  What could the Russians possibly do/have done to sway the election?  I can't think of two more polarizing candidates that Trump and Hillary.  Either you were or you weren't.  No in between.  There was no commercial, email, youtube video, googled chromes propaganda put out by the Rushkies or anyone else that was going to change anybody's mind about who they were voting for.  Seriously, what are they supposed to have done?

But on the anti-Hillary front, why are people not in jail for rigging the election against Burn Me?
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: Token on January 28, 2018, 10:52:19 PM
Trump has also discussed firing the assistant AG (the guy responsible for the Special Counsel).

Again, not that hard to see...unless you don't want to look.

Eventually, y'all will say, "so what if he colluded with Russia to win the election. So what if he tried on three separate occasions to obstruct justice. So what if he fucked two prostitutes and had them piss all over the bed (Yes, this happened)...etc."

If Obama did what Trump did, would everyone here be saying the same thing?


The worst obstruction of justice that I have seen in my lifetime from the President of the United States of America was comments made by Obama during the Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin incidents.  So take what you "think" Trump has done but hasn't been proven and go fuck yourself.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: The Prowler on January 29, 2018, 12:51:58 AM

The worst obstruction of justice that I have seen in my lifetime from the President of the United States of America was comments made by Obama during the Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin incidents.  So take what you "think" Trump has done but hasn't been proven and go fuck yourself.
What Trump has done is fired or tried to fire those leading the investigation into the Russian collusion and Trump's obstruction involving the first firing. If you don't think there's anything wrong with that, then you can take your opinions, ball them up, and shove them up your ass.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: War Eagle!!! on January 29, 2018, 09:06:42 AM
What Trump has done is fired or tried to fire those leading the investigation into the Russian collusion and Trump's obstruction involving the first firing. If you don't think there's anything wrong with that, then you can take your opinions, ball them up, and shove them up your ass.

You mean he tried to fire the group that he felt was illegally targeting him on some bullshit conspiracy?
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: GH2001 on January 29, 2018, 11:19:22 AM

The worst obstruction of justice that I have seen in my lifetime from the President of the United States of America was comments made by Obama during the Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin incidents.  So take what you "think" Trump has done but hasn't been proven and go fuck yourself.

I like the one where he got caught on a hot mic telling the Russian leader that he would take care of things after his 2012. To which the Russian leader responded he would relay the message to Vladimir.
Title: Re: The new story
Post by: CCTAU on January 29, 2018, 11:53:31 AM
I like the one where he got caught on a hot mic telling the Russian leader that he would take care of things after his 2012. To which the Russian leader responded he would relay the message to Vladimir.

But what about those under-aged hookers and blow?