Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Snaggletiger on January 03, 2018, 10:02:58 AM
-
Rodriguez was let go at Arizona and the headlines read (And the talking heads say) it was because of sexual harassment. Curious (And Bi) about what he had done, I pulled up an ESPN article on it. The piece said let go because of sexual harassment, but the content says otherwise. It says a former employee retained an attorney and made the claim of S.A. against him. From that point forward, she refused to cooperate or offer one shred of anything to substantiate her claim.
The University ran a 10 week investigation and admitted to finding nothing on the claim. They also verified the former employee offered nothing. Rod voluntarily took a lie detector test and admitted to having an affair but denied any harassment. He passed the test. She then files a notice of claim that she intends to file a $7.5 million lawsuit for a hostile working environment. Then, RR is let go.
I don't know and really don't care if there was just cause to let the man go. It just appears to me that all this woman had to do was make a totally unsubstantiated claim of sexual harassment and Pandora's box is opened and the guy loses his job. He may have done some shit worthy of being let go. But all the media wants to use are the buzz words of the day, sexual harassment.
Guess it doesn't have the same ring to it as Sexual Chocolate.
-
Seems to me that this is happening alot all over the place. At some point this going to come to a head.
-
Y'all may know him as Joe the Policeman from the "What's going down" episode of That's My Momma.
-
Rodriguez was let go at Arizona and the headlines read (And the talking heads say) it was because of sexual harassment. Curious (And Bi) about what he had done, I pulled up an ESPN article on it. The piece said let go because of sexual harassment, but the content says otherwise. It says a former employee retained an attorney and made the claim of S.A. against him. From that point forward, she refused to cooperate or offer one shred of anything to substantiate her claim.
The University ran a 10 week investigation and admitted to finding nothing on the claim. They also verified the former employee offered nothing. Rod voluntarily took a lie detector test and admitted to having an affair but denied any harassment. He passed the test. She then files a notice of claim that she intends to file a $7.5 million lawsuit for a hostile working environment. Then, RR is let go.
I don't know and really don't care if there was just cause to let the man go. It just appears to me that all this woman had to do was make a totally unsubstantiated claim of sexual harassment and Pandora's box is opened and the guy loses his job. He may have done some shit worthy of being let go. But all the media wants to use are the buzz words of the day, sexual harassment.
Guess it doesn't have the same ring to it as Sexual Chocolate.
From what I understood after reading a few stories, they found that it wasn't exactly as she said, but they found a lot of smoke in regards to the environment in general. It looks like they found enough wrong in general that they wanted to get ahead of it instead of invite an avalanche.
-
From what I understood after reading a few stories, they found that it wasn't exactly as she said, but they found a lot of smoke in regards to the environment in general. It looks like they found enough wrong in general that they wanted to get ahead of it instead of invite an avalanche.
This is most likely the case. Didn't they honor his contract anyway? I thought I saw that. If so, then it was probably best all around. I just hate the initial painting with a broad brush by the media in the click-bait headlines of it being a case of sexual harassment.
-
This is most likely the case. Didn't they honor his contract anyway? I thought I saw that. If so, then it was probably best all around. I just hate the initial painting with a broad brush by the media in the click-bait headlines of it being a case of sexual harassment.
The man took a polygraph and passed. Isn't that what the libs want to happen? I mean, if he's innocent, he'll take a polygraph, right?
The only good that has come out of this attack on men, is that the libtards are getting hit hard in the process!
The Roy Moore stuff kicked the door wide open! I hope none of you have ever brushed a booby in a bar!
-
This is most likely the case. Didn't they honor his contract anyway? I thought I saw that. If so, then it was probably best all around. I just hate the initial painting with a broad brush by the media in the click-bait headlines of it being a case of sexual harassment.
They're going to pay him $5.5 million, which covers his contract that ran through 2020. I'm guessing that was the best way to keep a lid on whatever they found.
-
The man took a polygraph and passed. Isn't that what the libs want to happen? I mean, if he's innocent, he'll take a polygraph, right?
The only good that has come out of this attack on men, is that the libtards are getting hit hard in the process!
The Roy Moore stuff kicked the door wide open! I hope none of you have ever brushed a booby in a bar!
Polygraph is worth dick-all.
-
Y'all may know him as Joe the Policeman from the "What's going down" episode of That's My Momma.
Randy Watson!!!
-
Polygraph is worth dick-all.
Because?
-
Because?
Notoriously unreliable and relatively easy to beat.
There's a reason you only see them on old episodes of Dragnet and not in actual court proceedings.
-
Notoriously unreliable and relatively easy to beat.
There's a reason you only see them on old episodes of Dragnet and not in actual court proceedings.
Why do you hate Joe Friday?
-
Should have kept it in his pants, wanked in the bathroom, and moved on. You hustle a side piece, it has consequences. I read the AD there as connections to Butch Jones. That would be funny.
-
Notoriously unreliable and relatively easy to beat.
There's a reason you only see them on old episodes of Dragnet and not in actual court proceedings.
I can get the unreliable part, not sure I buy easy to beat...especially for a football coach.
-
I can get the unreliable part, not sure I buy easy to beat...especially for a football coach.
It was just another sanctimonious misdirect. Everyone knows they are not admissible in court, but every libtard yelled for Moore to take one!
Now that someone accused of the same thing takes one and passes, you get people like wes coming out and saying they are not reliable...
-
The moral of the story is don't get your pussy where you get your paycheck. In nearly every single one of these instances, that's exactly what the problem is.
-
Also, I believe lie detectors are worthless.
-
It was just another sanctimonious misdirect. Everyone knows they are not admissible in court, but every libtard yelled for Moore to take one!
Now that someone accused of the same thing takes one and passes, you get people like wes coming out and saying they are not reliable...
I'll challenge you to find a single instance of me advocating that Roy Moore submit to a polygraph.
-
I wish somebody who is actually in real law enforcement would post their opinion re: lie detector tests.
Is bgreene still around? Maybe Smoothie?
-
Lie detector work when use with water board. And jumper cables.
-
I'll challenge you to find a single instance of me advocating that Roy Moore submit to a polygraph.
Roy would make you submit I think. Kinky.
-
I wish somebody who is actually in real law enforcement would post their opinion re: lie detector tests.
Is bgreene still around? Maybe Smoothie?
^^ Token
-
The moral of the story is don't get your pussy where you get your paycheck. In nearly every single one of these instances, that's exactly what the problem is.
It's like I post it and you reword it and post it too. :bar:
-
Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I gotta plead ignorance on this one.
-
^^ Token
:facepalm:
-
I'll challenge you to find a single instance of me advocating that Roy Moore submit to a polygraph.
Not sure that was his point.
-
:facepalm:
WT doesn't successfully troll often. But when he does....it's the goat fuqqer.
-
Not sure that was his point.
Then he should keep my name out of his bullshit.
-
Then he should keep my name out of his bullshit.
Was talking about his original point. Not his reply (to your reply of his OP) invoking your name.
-
What's my name? Say it. Say it, bitch!
-
Then he should keep my name out of his bullshoot.
You might want mention now too that should keep your gay hat out of conversation. It has nothing to do with argue.
-
Rodriguez was let go at Arizona and the headlines read (And the talking heads say) it was because of sexual harassment. Curious (And Bi) about what he had done, I pulled up an ESPN article on it. The piece said let go because of sexual harassment, but the content says otherwise. It says a former employee retained an attorney and made the claim of S.A. against him. From that point forward, she refused to cooperate or offer one shred of anything to substantiate her claim.
The University ran a 10 week investigation and admitted to finding nothing on the claim. They also verified the former employee offered nothing. Rod voluntarily took a lie detector test and admitted to having an affair but denied any harassment. He passed the test. She then files a notice of claim that she intends to file a $7.5 million lawsuit for a hostile working environment. Then, RR is let go.
I don't know and really don't care if there was just cause to let the man go. It just appears to me that all this woman had to do was make a totally unsubstantiated claim of sexual harassment and Pandora's box is opened and the guy loses his job. He may have done some shit worthy of being let go. But all the media wants to use are the buzz words of the day, sexual harassment.
Guess it doesn't have the same ring to it as Sexual Chocolate.
Tis the new environment we live and work in today. Screaming racism hasn't worked, so now it's "white supremacy" and "sexual harassment/assault". And with the sexual harassment/assault I think most bosses just figure they'd just rather not have the headache than fight it.
-
Not sure that was his point.
He is like saban, he usually makes it about him...
-
He is like saban, he usually makes it about him...
I thought it was because he's not very tall.
-
I bet his red button is the reddest buttonest of them all.
-
I thought it was because he's not very tall.
I thought it was because he wears gay hats.
-
I bet his red button is the reddest buttonest of them all.
my button is bigger and it works
-
Token and I worked with a guy that did some research on the polygraph. His would often say that flipping a coin is more reliable than a polygraph. However, through my experience, most people still believe that it will announce your every sin. So the threat is better than the test itself.
-
Token and I worked with a guy that did some research on the polygraph. His would often say that flipping a coin is more reliable than a polygraph. However, through my experience, most people still believe that it will announce your every sin. So the threat is better than the test itself.
Perception=reality. This is how Bama gets in when they haven't beaten a good team all year. Thanks Obama!
-
Token and I worked with a guy that did some research on the polygraph. His would often say that flipping a coin is more reliable than a polygraph. However, through my experience, most people still believe that it will announce your every sin. So the threat is better than the test itself.
Polygraph is nothing but a tool to extract a confession. They're worthless for their stated purpose, but they do get people to confess when they're told "we're having some issues with your answers on certain questions...let's go over them again." They never have "issues" with your previous address, your name, etc. Only with questions material to their investigation, and people with change their answers or confess their lies/sins quite often. Then ones that that are heavily suspected as guilty, but refuse to come off their story on the polygraph get the "inconclusive" results. It's rare anybody ever passes one, and they "fail" not because of the machine readings, but because they lied and changed their story when confronted.