Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Godfather on December 27, 2017, 03:25:15 PM

Title: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: Godfather on December 27, 2017, 03:25:15 PM
Former AU Tailback Brad Lester arrested in Jawjaw on child porn charges....damn those sexy kids.
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: Saniflush on December 28, 2017, 02:20:41 PM
Former AU Tailback Brad Lester arrested in Jawjaw on child porn charges....damn those sexy kids.

"Jerry, you'll appreciate this...."
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: wesfau2 on December 28, 2017, 02:45:50 PM
"Jerry, you'll appreciate this...."

Know your audience.
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: AUChizad on December 28, 2017, 03:13:35 PM
This is obviously hugely disappointing.

The article said he was "producing child pornography with intent to distribute". If true, fuck him to hell and back.

The only details I read in the release said it involved filming a kid pee with his cell phone in a restaurant. I'm not knee-jerk defending him, but the specifics on this are sparse enough at this point that I can't entirely rule out that there was some sort of innocent explanation. Maybe the kid was peeing with his pants around his ankles or something and he was filming it to text to one of his buddies as a joke making fun of the kid?

Maybe I just don't want to believe Brad Lester beats off to videos of kids peeing, but maybe he does.
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: WiregrassTiger on December 28, 2017, 03:19:00 PM
This is obviously hugely disappointing.

The article said he was "producing child pornography with intent to distribute". If true, fuck him to hell and back.

The only details I read in the release said it involved filming a kid pee with his cell phone in a restaurant. I'm not knee-jerk defending him, but the specifics on this are sparse enough at this point that I can't entirely rule out that there was some sort of innocent explanation. Maybe the kid was peeing with his pants around his ankles or something and he was filming it to text to one of his buddies as a joke making fun of the kid?

Maybe I just don't want to believe Brad Lester beats off to videos of kids peeing, but maybe he does.
I didn’t read all of your post, as usual. But what is supposedly unusual about peeing with your pants around your ankles?
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: Snaggletiger on December 28, 2017, 03:23:52 PM
This is obviously hugely disappointing.

The article said he was "producing child pornography with intent to distribute". If true, fuck him to hell and back.

The only details I read in the release said it involved filming a kid pee with his cell phone in a restaurant. I'm not knee-jerk defending him, but the specifics on this are sparse enough at this point that I can't entirely rule out that there was some sort of innocent explanation. Maybe the kid was peeing with his pants around his ankles or something and he was filming it to text to one of his buddies as a joke making fun of the kid?

Maybe I just don't want to believe Brad Lester beats off to videos of kids peeing, but maybe he does.

He's no Roy Moore.
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 28, 2017, 04:04:39 PM
This is obviously hugely disappointing.

The article said he was "producing child pornography with intent to distribute". If true, fudge him to hell and back.

The only details I read in the release said it involved filming a kid pee with his cell phone in a restaurant. I'm not knee-jerk defending him, but the specifics on this are sparse enough at this point that I can't entirely rule out that there was some sort of innocent explanation. Maybe the kid was peeing with his pants around his ankles or something and he was filming it to text to one of his buddies as a joke making fun of the kid?

Maybe I just don't want to believe Brad Lester beats off to videos of kids peeing, but maybe he does.
R. Kelly wants to know.
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: dallaswareagle on December 28, 2017, 04:07:20 PM
This is obviously hugely disappointing.

The article said he was "producing child pornography with intent to distribute". If true, fuck him to hell and back.

The only details I read in the release said it involved filming a kid pee with his cell phone in a restaurant. I'm not knee-jerk defending him, but the specifics on this are sparse enough at this point that I can't entirely rule out that there was some sort of innocent explanation. Maybe the kid was peeing with his pants around his ankles or something and he was filming it to text to one of his buddies as a joke making fun of the kid?

Maybe I just don't want to believe Brad Lester beats off to videos of kids peeing, but maybe he does.


Everybody wants a picture of Nick, no matter what he is doing. Imagine the sales in turd town.
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: Saniflush on December 29, 2017, 08:56:21 AM
R. Kelly wants to know.
Drip, drip, drip.

Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: CCTAU on December 30, 2017, 12:35:27 AM
Yeah. I don't care how funny it looks, if you see a kid taking a piss with his pants around his ankles, don't record it!
Title: Re: Lester the Child Molestor?
Post by: WiregrassTiger on December 30, 2017, 05:12:21 AM
Yeah. I don't care how funny it looks, if you see a kid taking a piss with his pants around his ankles, don't record it!
^^^This. Not funny at all. If you get off on this sort of thing you should just keep it to yourself like Wes.