Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: The Prowler on November 15, 2016, 10:05:34 PM
-
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/15107282_1271936112848059_558994025138003695_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=50122638e00511ffe3964c0de3b309c1&oe=5889B30C)
#15 Auburn (Soooo, you're telling me there's a chance)
-
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/15107282_1271936112848059_558994025138003695_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=50122638e00511ffe3964c0de3b309c1&oe=5889B30C)
#15 Auburn (Soooo, you're telling me there's a chance)
^^
Ruins the sport
-
Two teams lose to unranked opponents and stay in the top 4?
Words. I doesn't has them.
-
^^
Ruins the sport
Yup. No consistency...kinda like Auburn's offense without that one player.
-
Two teams lose to unranked opponents and stay in the top 4?
Words. I doesn't has them.
Who do you put in ahead of them? Until that question can be answered you have to keep them there.
-
Who do you put in ahead of them? Until that question can be answered you have to keep them there.
Alabama...in all four spots. Everyone else is unworthy.
-
Who do you put in ahead of them? Until that question can be answered you have to keep them there.
Louisville would get one of the slots.
-
Louisville would get one of the slots.
Over Michigan or Ohio state sure. But over Clemson? Hard to when Clemson beat them.
-
Over Michigan or Ohio state sure. But over Clemson? Hard to when Clemson beat them.
Not IMO...
Louisville lost to a #2 ranked Clemson on the road. Clemson lost to an unranked Pitt at home. The loss to Clemson or not I would rank Louisville above (dabo). But is also why our system is once again lame because it's all subjective.
-
Not IMO...
Louisville lost to a #2 ranked Clemson on the road. Clemson lost to an unranked Pitt at home. The loss to Clemson or not I would rank Louisville above (dabo). But is also why our system is once again lame because it's all subjective.
I Get that. But shouldn't head to head take precedence? Before two weeks ago should we have been ahead of a&m? It's similar. We lost to Aggie yet we plastered an unranked team (msu) they lost to. We had lost to them and Clemson. Better losses than them but they won the head to head.
Deep thoughts. By gh.
Regardless Louisville may be in anyway if they win out since Ohio state or Michigan will be saying bye bye in two weeks. Everyone else wins out it will prob be bama, osu or mich, Clemson and Louisville. Really wanna see Louisville play bama.
-
I Get that. But shouldn't head to head take precedence? Before two weeks ago should we have been ahead of a&m?
Don't know all subjective. To me a loss is a loss. So I would look at the loss.
Losing to a top 5 on the road vs losing to an unranked at home.
and I believed we should have been ranked above aTm at the time yes. They loss to MSU
-
Don't know all subjective. To me a loss is a loss. So I would look at the loss.
Losing to a top 5 on the road vs losing to an unranked at home.
and I believed we should have been ranked above aTm at the time yes. They loss to MSU
Unless Louisville screws the pooch I think they're in anyway.
-
Unless Louisville screws the pooch I think they're in anyway.
Well, they will need someone to lose, that's stating the obvious. More obvious than that, the love for the current top four.
-
Well, they will need someone to lose, that's stating the obvious. More obvious than that, the love for the current top four.
One of the top 4 will lose.
-
One of the top 4 will lose.
I'm not taking you at your word. Please explain how you can look at the current top 4 and make such an outrageous statement like that. I'm betting you have no facts to back that claim up.
-
One of the top 4 will lose.
Balderdash! South Carolina has no chance - none whatsoever - of beating Clemson.
-
Balderdash! South Carolina has no chance - none whatsoever - of beating Clemson.
EXACTLY what I'm talking about.
-
Balderdash! South Carolina has no chance - none whatsoever - of beating Clemson.
I stand corrected. What was I thinking. The fighting muschamps are horrible.