Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: djsimp on January 15, 2016, 04:02:17 PM

Title: Tech to AU?
Post by: djsimp on January 15, 2016, 04:02:17 PM
Interesting......

http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/texas-tech-graduate-transfer-qb-to-visit-auburn/
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: djsimp on January 15, 2016, 04:06:04 PM
I don't know anything about this kid so here is what I found from the youtubers.

https://youtu.be/fpoh98c3lG4
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: dallaswareagle on January 15, 2016, 04:37:28 PM
Those people running down field and catching the ball and then running some more, what do you call those?
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: The Prowler on January 15, 2016, 05:07:50 PM
Don't need him if he can't run the zone read.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 15, 2016, 08:00:14 PM
Those people running down field and catching the ball and then running some more, what do you call those?

'round here, we call them blockers
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 15, 2016, 11:03:08 PM
Don't need him if he can't run the zone read.

Paul Smith, David Johnson and Chris Todd want a word with you.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: jmar on January 16, 2016, 02:28:45 PM
Don't need him if he can't run the zone read.
Agree. The number of Malzahn wins and viability of the program only as strong as the ability to run the read option. Otherwise we are all but assured a repeat in Birmingham.   
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: jmar on January 16, 2016, 02:36:16 PM
Paul Smith, David Johnson and Chris Todd want a word with you.
Yes but that is now an old outdated argument. Give it a fucking rest. The genius has to rediscover his touch which is why he;s bringing back the Herb Hand.
 





Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: CCTAU on January 16, 2016, 03:04:11 PM
Yes but that is now an old outdated argument. Give it a fucking rest. The genius has to rediscover his touch which is why he;s bringing back the Herb Hand.

Well. If he can't coach like he used to, it's time for him to go!
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: jmar on January 16, 2016, 03:20:44 PM
Well. If he can't coach like he used to, it's time for him to go!
Absolutely agree but the ridiculous contract calls for a small degree of patience. We are getting the Hand back together, so to speak and this is the pivotal year. Anybody's guess which way we turn but I wouldn't venture to copycat power football anytime soon...would just try another flavor running it from the HUNH which is an alternative to what the Turd's run for the most part.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: The Prowler on January 17, 2016, 04:59:20 AM
Paul Smith, David Johnson and Chris Todd want a word with you.
Why, so they can tell me that they were in a passing spread type offense before Malzahn arrived and they were coached under a different coach the previous year (hint not coached in Malzahn's system). I'm of the impression that if CGM doesn't have a QB that can run whenever his dumbass calls for the one or two receiver route plays and they're usually double and triple covered because the defenses have decoded his picture boards, so they pretty much know exactly what's coming, then the play will not go well.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 27, 2016, 02:29:48 PM
Take him off the list of possibles.  He committed to the Dope Smokin' Buffaloes.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: jmar on January 27, 2016, 02:45:42 PM
Take him off the list of possibles.  He committed to the Dope Smokin' Buffaloes.
He who?
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Jumbo on January 27, 2016, 03:59:32 PM
Those people running down field and catching the ball and then running some more, what do you call those?
Lollygaggers!
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: dallaswareagle on January 27, 2016, 04:01:01 PM
Those people running down field and catching the ball and then running some more, what do you call those?

Lollygaggers!


I hope we are trying to recruit some.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 27, 2016, 04:08:08 PM

I hope we are trying to recruit some.

No, they're already playing for TT.  I think Lontrell Lollygagger is better than his brother, Dontrell.  Now, they do have a younger brother in high school, Demontrell Lollygagger.  But it looks like Demontrell is going to follow in his father, Quantrell's footsteps and play basketball.  Their mother, Quenisha Brown, is so proud.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: dallaswareagle on January 27, 2016, 04:19:21 PM
No, they're already playing for TT.  I think Lontrell Lollygagger is better than his brother, Dontrell.  Now, they do have a younger brother in high school, Demontrell Lollygagger.  But it looks like Demontrell is going to follow in his father, Quantrell's footsteps and play basketball.  Their mother, Quenisha Brown, is so proud.

https://www.facebook.com/quenisha.brown.7   
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 27, 2016, 04:20:42 PM
Daaammmnn...Quenisha booty.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 27, 2016, 04:42:12 PM
Aaaaaaaaand Webb commits to:




































Colorado.  Wants to gain 15 pounds this season, I assume.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 27, 2016, 04:45:13 PM
Aaaaaaaaand Webb commits to:




































Colorado.  Wants to gain 15 pounds this season, I assume.

Welcome to 2 hours and 20 minutes ago.  Maaannn, you are one pathetic loser.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: dallaswareagle on January 27, 2016, 04:52:48 PM
Welcome to 2 hours and 20 minutes ago.  Maaannn, you are one pathetic loser.

I wouldn't say he is pathetic.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Jumbo on January 27, 2016, 06:01:20 PM
Another huge pick up for Gus.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: djsimp on January 27, 2016, 09:17:16 PM
I wouldn't say he is pathetic.

Yes you would.
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: Godfather on January 28, 2016, 09:33:20 AM
We roll 7 deep at QB
Title: Re: Tech to AU?
Post by: dallaswareagle on January 28, 2016, 11:30:15 AM
Yes you would.

The Mrs. would, not me.