Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: The Six on October 23, 2012, 11:42:33 AM

Title: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: The Six on October 23, 2012, 11:42:33 AM
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1604311/auburn_offense_medium.jpg)

Pretty well sums it up.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Buzz Killington on October 23, 2012, 11:50:03 AM
If they ran Tre Mason as much as the wheel suggests, this offense would be ranked higher.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: The Six on October 23, 2012, 12:13:10 PM
If they ran Tre Mason as much as the wheel suggests, this offense would be ranked higher.

Yeah, it doesn't account for the times he's on the bench for ten plays following runs of 7 or more yards.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: AWK on October 23, 2012, 12:13:51 PM
How does one do a sweep up the middle? 


Dumb.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: The Six on October 23, 2012, 12:17:01 PM
How does one do a sweep up the middle? 


Dumb.

It says "Not Up the Middle".

Check your glasses, Chevy.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Godfather on October 23, 2012, 12:35:47 PM
It says "Not Up the Middle".

Check your glasses, Chevy.
I think that is what he was getting at, why does it need to be clarified?
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Pell City Tiger on October 23, 2012, 12:36:44 PM
If they ran Tre Mason as much as the wheel suggests, this offense would be ranked higher.
Troof!

This wheel is horse shit. The momentum killing wildcat and yet to gain a positive yard bubble screen plays are absent. Those two make up a third of Lostler's playbook.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: The Six on October 23, 2012, 12:39:35 PM
I think that is what he was getting at, why does it need to be clarified?

Ease up, Billy, I'm just funnin' wit him.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Buzz Killington on October 23, 2012, 01:43:05 PM
How does one do a sweep up the middle? 


Dumb.

You obviously didn't watch the fourth quarter last Saturday.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: The Prowler on October 23, 2012, 10:19:46 PM
Also, it left off Pass attempt from Moseley 12 yards behind the LOS, only to be sacked. And it should've taken out one of the Mason runs and put in another Sideline Sweep with OMac.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: RWS on October 23, 2012, 10:33:16 PM
Also, it left off Pass attempt from Moseley 12 yards behind the LOS, only to be sacked. And it should've taken out one of the Mason runs and put in another Sideline Sweep with OMac.
Have some patience.  I'm sure that they're going to fix it.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: chinook on October 24, 2012, 12:51:01 AM
Punt.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: jmar on October 24, 2012, 05:36:13 AM
Punt.
We could elect to punt on every possession and just let Van Gorder work solely on defensing the A&M's, UGA and Bama for the remaining games and get mo ready for next season.

Our offense would indicate some form of self-flagelation not to be confused with the perverse however...
   according to reports prior to the Loeffler hire we interviewed Koetter (Falcons) and Pease (UF) among others. 

 

Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: CCTAU on October 24, 2012, 03:38:21 PM
We could elect to punt on every possession and just let Van Gorder work solely on defensing the A&M's, UGA and Bama for the remaining games and get mo ready for next season.

Our offense would indicate some form of self-flagelation not to be confused with the perverse however...
   according to reports prior to the Loeffler hire we interviewed Koetter (Falcons) and Pease (UF) among others.

Yes. But they had their own ideas. I think Chizik got what he wanted (a guy he could mold) and now he sees how stupid it was to try and think offensively!
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Snaggletiger on October 24, 2012, 03:49:20 PM
Pease and Koetter obviously would have been better hires but why would they want to come to Auburn, given the positions they are in?  BVG, I get.  The Falcons were probably ready for a change after getting bounced in the first round every year.  But, I think it would have been an odd move for either of those guys to make the move to AU.  Loeffler wanting to move from Temple?  No question he jumped at the chance. 
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: dallaswareagle on October 24, 2012, 03:58:10 PM
Pease and Koetter obviously would have been better hires but why would they want to come to Auburn, given the positions they are in?  BVG, I get.  The Falcons were probably ready for a change after getting bounced in the first round every year.  But, I think it would have been an odd move for either of those guys to make the move to AU.  Loeffler wanting to move from Temple?  No question he jumped at the chance.

Last sustained long drive he was part of.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Snaggletiger on October 24, 2012, 03:59:54 PM
Last sustained long drive he was part of.

 :rimshot: :thumsup:
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: Buzz Killington on October 24, 2012, 04:03:27 PM
Last sustained long drive he was part of.

You don't say much, friend...but when you do, it's to the point and I salute you for it.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: dallaswareagle on October 24, 2012, 06:05:23 PM
You don't say much, friend...but when you do, it's to the point and I salute you for it.

Well, I could not have done it without Snaggle-He threw the hanging curve.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: jmar on October 24, 2012, 06:25:47 PM
Pease and Koetter obviously would have been better hires but why would they want to come to Auburn, given the positions they are in?  BVG, I get.  The Falcons were probably ready for a change after getting bounced in the first round every year.  But, I think it would have been an odd move for either of those guys to make the move to AU.  Loeffler wanting to move from Temple?  No question he jumped at the chance.
Maybe, but it could also be that the Malzahn bucks weren't offered to either. 
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: dallaswareagle on October 24, 2012, 08:10:37 PM
Maybe, but it could also be that the Malzahn bucks weren't offered to either.

Well, based on what we are getting I see why.
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: jmar on October 24, 2012, 09:10:28 PM
Well, based on what we are getting I see why.
So true.
Not that anyone reads newspapers anymore but can't we take out a full page add directed at Jacobs?
Title: Re: Auburn's Offense in a Graphic
Post by: DnATL on October 24, 2012, 09:39:22 PM
So true.
Not that anyone reads newspapers anymore but can't we take out a full page add directed at Jacobs?
Just put it in the comics section between Beetle Bailey and Peanuts, to make sure he sees it