Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Townhallsavoy on September 27, 2012, 12:05:51 PM

Title: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Townhallsavoy on September 27, 2012, 12:05:51 PM
In Auburn's two SEC games, OMAC has been tackled for a loss 11 times out of 19 total carries.

I don't think OMAC is a bad running back.  However, I do think we are trying to hit the corner too much.  It's asinine that four games into the season, we would attempt the jet sweep more than twice. 
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 27, 2012, 12:17:26 PM
In Auburn's two SEC games, OMAC has been tackled for a loss 11 times out of 19 total carries.

I don't think OMAC is a bad running back.  However, I do think we are trying to hit the corner too much.  It's asinine that four games into the season, we would attempt the jet sweep more than twice.

Then why attempt it at all?
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Six on September 27, 2012, 12:22:45 PM
Then why attempt it at all?

We are keeping it simple. This "Pro Style" offense is so complicated. It takes a lot of patience to learn it I'm told. We are lucky they run the 6 plays they run.


 :taunt:
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: noxin on September 27, 2012, 12:28:05 PM
We are keeping it simple. This "Pro Style" offense is so complicated. It takes a lot of patience to learn it I'm told. We are lucky they run the 6 plays they run.


Glad to see you're getting it
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Townhallsavoy on September 27, 2012, 12:31:50 PM
Then why attempt it at all?

I was trying to be nice. 

I could see trying the jet sweep as a misdirection after establishing the run and/or pass.  But to use it as our primary run play when it's getting stuffed against reputable defenses is insanity. 
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 27, 2012, 12:32:26 PM
We are keeping it simple. This "Pro Style" offense is so complicated. It takes a lot of patience to learn it I'm told. We are lucky they run the 6 plays they run.


 :taunt:

Very true. 

The Jet Sweep is a good play.  We usually run it as a read play with power O blocking.  If it's a give (to OMac) read, we really only need to get a couple of people on the edge blocked to have a decent (5-8yard) gain.  One of 2 things is probably happening.  Either the skill guys on the edge aren't blocking/sustaining their blocks long enough, or Frazier is making bad reads.    Also to consider is that whatever defenses are doing to take it away, IF that's the case and it's not just that we're not blocking it or we're reading it wrong, is probably something that, IF we had a QB that could pass, we could make them pay for, but we can't so they don't have to "play the jet honestly" because we can't do other things.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 27, 2012, 12:37:51 PM
Very true. 

The Jet Sweep is a good play.  We usually run it as a read play with power O blocking.  If it's a give (to OMac) read, we really only need to get a couple of people on the edge blocked to have a decent (5-8yard) gain.  One of 2 things is probably happening.  Either the skill guys on the edge aren't blocking/sustaining their blocks long enough, or Frazier is making bad reads.    Also to consider is that whatever defenses are doing to take it away, IF that's the case and it's not just that we're not blocking it or we're reading it wrong, is probably something that, IF we had a QB that could pass, we could make them pay for, but we can't so they don't have to "play the jet honestly" because we can't do other things.

Say it ain't so.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Six on September 27, 2012, 12:39:22 PM
Glad to see you're getting it

You forgot my  :taunt:



Bammer
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 27, 2012, 12:44:26 PM
Say it ain't so.

IF that were the case, then the DE would be hitting OMac in the mouth, and I don't think that's what's happening is it?  I honestly don't recall.   I'd have to go back and look at the replay, but I think it's being run down by OLBs, or Safeties rolling down, which is either a blocking issue (not the OL, but TE/WRs), or the defense being able to over compensate to stop it because of our inability to make them pay for doing so.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: AWK on September 27, 2012, 01:05:58 PM
You forgot my  :taunt:



Bammer
I think he was sarcastically agreeing with you and mocking Prowler.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Six on September 27, 2012, 01:09:12 PM
I think he was sarcastically agreeing with you and mocking Prowler.

I know. I was being sarcastic in return. It's all good, nox.

 :bar:

Prowler is a troll though.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Townhallsavoy on September 27, 2012, 01:18:18 PM
I know. I was being sarcastic in return. It's all good, nox.

 :bar:

Prowler is a zombie though.

FTFY
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Yoda on September 27, 2012, 02:29:21 PM
The other side of that stat, is Omac is still averaging almost 6 yards a carry.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Townhallsavoy on September 27, 2012, 02:33:55 PM
The other side of that stat, is Omac is still averaging almost 6 yards a carry.

6.8 against Clemson.
11.6 against LA Monroe.

.5 against Miss State.
2.1 against LSU. 
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Six on September 27, 2012, 02:36:20 PM
6.8 against Clemson.
11.6 against LA Monroe.

.5 against Miss State.
2.1 against LSU.

:sarcasm:

GALDARNIT TARNATION PATIENCE! IT TAKES MUGGAFUDGIN TIME!

Yeah, those stats kinda suck. Think teams have figured out this offense is a bit one dimensional? Or half-dimensional even?
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2012, 02:38:29 PM
QB play affects everything.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Six on September 27, 2012, 02:42:28 PM
In the two SEC games, Auburn has rolled up 91 and 86 net yards rushing and 125 and 97 yards passing. That's an average of 88.5 on the ground and 111 in the air average.

QB play does all that? Nah, there's more wrong that just Frazier.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Townhallsavoy on September 27, 2012, 02:46:02 PM
In the two SEC games, Auburn has rolled up 91 and 86 net yards rushing and 125 and 97 yards passing. That's an average of 88.5 on the ground and 111 in the air average.

QB play does all that? Nah, there's more wrong that just Frazier.

It's mostly Frazier, though.  It doesn't excuse some of the consistently bad play calls, but most bad play calls are probably happening becuse of Frazier. 
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 27, 2012, 02:49:52 PM


Yeah, those stats kinda suck. Think teams have figured out this offense is a bit one dimensional? Or half-dimensional even?

Absolutly.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Snaggletiger on September 27, 2012, 03:00:32 PM
Calm down, people.  The 3 teams we lost to have a combined record of 11-1.  All is well.  We're knocking on the door.  We're turning the corner.  We're...I...have no clue what that has to do with anything.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 27, 2012, 03:07:45 PM
Calm down, people.  The 3 teams we lost to have a combined record of 11-1.  All is well.  We're knocking on the door.  We're turning the corner.  We're...I...have no clue what that has to do with anything.

P-A-T-I-E-N-C-E
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Saniflush on September 27, 2012, 03:34:51 PM
Calm down, people.  The 3 teams we lost to have a combined record of 11-1.  All is well.  We're knocking on the door.  We're turning the corner.  We're...I...have no clue what that has to do with anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDAmPIq29ro
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Snaggletiger on September 27, 2012, 03:35:49 PM
Thank you sir, may I have another?
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 27, 2012, 04:00:40 PM
P-A-T-I-E-N-C-E

(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii162/lolomgitsapic/patience.jpg)   
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Snaggletiger on September 27, 2012, 04:09:47 PM
(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii162/lolomgitsapic/patience.jpg)

For the first time in a long time on the X, something gets posted and I say, "Now that's just wrong."
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 27, 2012, 04:11:46 PM
For the first time in a long time on the X, something gets posted and I say, "Now that's just wrong."

I'll take that as a back handed Complement.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Pell City Tiger on September 27, 2012, 07:07:54 PM
(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii162/lolomgitsapic/patience.jpg)
That poor buzzard's gonna starve to death.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2012, 08:34:50 PM
I'll take that as a back handed Complement.
Then that's sad that you'd take it like that, because that's pretty fucking disgusting.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 28, 2012, 12:25:43 AM
Then that's sad that you'd take it like that, because that's pretty fucking disgusting.

Oh boo fucking who, this is a big boy site where things are said and posted that would offend most folks. Things have been said about most subjects.

Try this place:

www.aufamily.com       Pussy's post there often.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: The Prowler on September 28, 2012, 04:58:44 AM
Oh boo fucking who, this is a big boy site where things are said and posted that would offend most folks. Things have been said about most subjects.

Try this place:

www.aufamily.com       Pussy's post there often.
Well, seeing as how you're one of the pussy whining fans here, you should know about that site (feathers, flock & fuck)
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Kaos on September 28, 2012, 08:32:27 AM
(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii162/lolomgitsapic/patience.jpg)

^^

Worst thing I've ever seen posted here.   That's just wrong. 

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Beijing_bouddhist_monk_2009_IMG_1486.JPG/220px-Beijing_bouddhist_monk_2009_IMG_1486.JPG)
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: CCTAU on September 28, 2012, 09:24:18 AM
Well. Back to the discussion......


Who am I kidding. After that pic, this thread is pretty much done.


As much as I want to blame that on Sally Struthers, I just cannot laugh at that.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Saniflush on September 28, 2012, 10:09:38 AM
Fuck you weak kneed bitches.


That shit is comedy gold.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: AWK on September 28, 2012, 10:10:42 AM
Fuck you weak kneed bitches.


That shit is comedy gold.
Agree.  Untuck your balls.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Godfather on September 28, 2012, 10:13:30 AM
Fuck you weak kneed bitches.


That shit is comedy gold.
Dabbie weeps for us all.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Saniflush on September 28, 2012, 10:17:55 AM
Dabbie weeps for us all.


The Warden started relaying Auburn stories last weekend.....Like when he was there the North endzone had metal/aluminum bleachers where all the "help" sat during games.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: Pell City Tiger on September 28, 2012, 06:46:27 PM
Fuck you weak kneed bitches.


That shit is comedy gold.
Seconded ..... thirded, even.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: AUTiger1 on September 28, 2012, 11:41:38 PM
Personally, I thought that shit was hilarious.  To my defense, I did stop mid laugh and say to myself, "Damn that was wrong."
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 29, 2012, 12:13:56 PM
Personally, I thought that shit was hilarious.  To my defense, I did stop mid laugh and say to myself, "Damn that was wrong."

-5       Go drink a beer for your sins.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: AUTiger1 on September 29, 2012, 03:54:58 PM
-5       Go drink a beer for your sins.

I drank bourbon instead.  Does that count?
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 29, 2012, 03:57:41 PM
I drank bourbon instead.  Does that count?

On ice, or with coke product?  Think about your answer carefully!
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 29, 2012, 04:35:51 PM
I drank bourbon instead.  Does that count?

It all counts. -5 taken back
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: AUTiger1 on September 29, 2012, 09:12:40 PM
On ice, or with coke product?  Think about your answer carefully!

On ice.  Coke product sucks!   Why waste a good Bourbon with coke?
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 29, 2012, 09:15:14 PM
On ice.  Coke product sucks!   Why waste a good Bourbon with coke?

Why would you do coke and drink-ahh nevermind.
Title: Re: Failure to Adjust
Post by: JR4AU on September 29, 2012, 09:33:35 PM
On ice.  Coke product sucks!   Why waste a good Bourbon with coke?


 #winning