auburn 3
msu 2
If we play like we did last week:
AU 21 MSU 17
If we correct 1/4 of the mistakes from last week:
AU 24 MSU 13
If we correct half of the mistakes from last week:
AU 34 MSU 10
If we correct 3/4 of the mistakes from last week:
AU 41 MSU 9
If we correct all of the mistakes from last week:
AU 48 MSU 6
If we play like we did last week:
AU 21 MSU 17
If we correct 1/4 of the mistakes from last week:
AU 24 MSU 13
If we correct half of the mistakes from last week:
AU 34 MSU 10
If we correct 3/4 of the mistakes from last week:
AU 41 MSU 9
If we correct all of the mistakes from last week:
AU 48 MSU 6
Going to be a forfeit.
I just called the staff. There's no reason to show up for this game. Meagan Mullen wants to win. That's enough. AU has no chance now.
So they'll stop over at the Burger King that looks like a log cabin and then bus it on back to Auburn.
There's no reason to stick around.
I'm going with option B.
Not surprisingly, the real choice was in the negatives. Option -w was the right choice. We didn't play like we did last week. We didn't improve 1/4 or 3/4 or all of our mistakes. We added to them. We added a lot.
IMO, the coaches are still trying to figure out the makeup of this team. There are still players on the field that, at this time, shouldn't be...RG Chad Slade (better OL play = less timid QB), MLB Jake Holland (â€Nova†McKinzy needs to have his face in the Defensive playbook and his ass in film study), S Jermaine Whitehead (he should change his number to #15 because he's playing about the same as Neiko Thorpe, Erique Florence was better than Neiko and IMO he'll be better than Jermaine).No offense brother, but you are on a island here. There are no more excuses Prowler.
No offense brother, but you are on a island here. There are no more excuses Prowler.
Figure out the makeup of this team? What the fuck was last year cause we didn't lose a lot. What about spring practice? They couldn't use then? Ok fall practice then surely they have them figured out? No? The first game? Maybe they do have them figured out....they suck.
Seriously, most strides are made between the first and second game. Unlike most on here I was optimistic after the first game. I no longer am. That was horrible football all around, coaches and players. There is no reason we should have lost to that team. None! We regressed...we did the same shit last year. It scares me!!!
No offense brother, but you are on a island here. There are no more excuses Prowler.Last year on Offense, we had a different starting QB, RB, LT, RT, OC & completely different Offensive playcalling. Last year on Defense, we had a different LB Coach, DB Coach & DC.
Figure out the makeup of this team? What the fuck was last year cause we didn't lose a lot. What about spring practice? They couldn't use then? Ok fall practice then surely they have them figured out? No? The first game? Maybe they do have them figured out....they suck.
Seriously, most strides are made between the first and second game. Unlike most on here I was optimistic after the first game. I no longer am. That was horrible football all around, coaches and players. There is no reason we should have lost to that team. None! We regressed...we did the same shit last year. It scares me!!!
Last year on Offense, we had a different starting QB, RB, LT, RT, OC & completely different Offensive playcalling. Last year on Defense, we had a different LB Coach, DB Coach & DC.
Apparently it's taking longer for the transition on both sides of the ball (they're recruiting their type of players as we speak, bigger RBs, bigger LBers & Safeties). If the coaches can't get their shit together and get this ship corrected then it'll be hard to get those needed players.
Those are the facts.
Another thing, no you can't find out everything about your team while going up against yourself. You learn more about your team after the first two or three games. We'll get to see how this team handles adversity after getting basically shit stomped by MSU. I hope they don't handle it like what I saw Saturday morning.
I do give you credit for standing by your team, that is for sure. I do not agree with all of your assessments however.Everything that I posted was all facts, there's nothing to agree or disagree with.
Last year on Offense, we had a different starting QB, RB, LT, RT, OC & completely different Offensive playcalling. Last year on Defense, we had a different LB Coach, DB Coach & DC.
Apparently it's taking longer for the transition on both sides of the ball (they're recruiting their type of players as we speak, bigger RBs, bigger LBers & Safeties). If the coaches can't get their shit together and get this ship corrected then it'll be hard to get those needed players.
Those are the facts.
Another thing, no you can't find out everything about your team while going up against yourself. You learn more about your team after the first two or three games. We'll get to see how this team handles adversity after getting basically shit stomped by MSU. I hope they don't handle it like what I saw Saturday morning.
Everything that I posted was all facts, there's nothing to agree or disagree with.
Everything that I posted was all facts, there's nothing to agree or disagree with.
Bullshit Prowler he has been there 4 years, we have had four top ten recruiting classes. That alone should have given us enough talent to win on Saturday. Losing...i'm sorry getting our ass handed to us by Mississippi fucking State is sick and not acceptable. It's fucking excuses.
This I do agree with. My facts show that. Chizik has been given three years to build a team, with no pressure. My facts show me that he was able to win a BCS title in that time with someone else's recruits and a year of his. Great move to recruit two ju-co players, I will say. In three years we should be playing seniors, juniors and any freshman and sophomores with the talent to play.
The real problem is that we have not developed players, have not been able to get talent on the field or even keep them on the team. That is why we are young every year. This is a coaching problem, nothing more nothing less. If Chizik is around in three years we could still be saying that we are young, because there is some kind of disconnect with molding and developing kids into young men.
Prowler, you are right we did make some changes to the OC and DC, the part about the players, is an excuse. That is a fact. The play calling I saw on Saturday was very basic and Kiehl still couldn't compete. LT is an upgrade you said it yourself and personally I though the line has done well, Kiehl has had time. They have had 4 years to get a QB we have none.
On the defensive side we didn't change scheme...still running the same 4-3 we were running before. Still need fast agile ends to sack, need big line pushers in DL to clog the middle, tall DBs that are fast to cover and LB's that can tackle the guys. They have had 4 years to get those guys. I think we have the talent at the DL I don't think we have the talent at LB at all. Those guys with the exception of Bates don't deserve to be playing D1 football. The secondary have been sporadic, although I am willing to give them a bit of a pass because they have had to do the majority of the work.
Prowler, you are right we did make some changes to the OC and DC, the part about the players, is an excuse. That is a fact. The play calling I saw on Saturday was very basic and Kiehl still couldn't compete. LT is an upgrade you said it yourself and personally I though the line has done well, Kiehl has had time. They have had 4 years to get a QB we have none.For the most part the OL has been pretty good...take Chad Slade out of there and it becomes really good (I'm guessing the coaches don't have confidence in Alex Kozan, but I do think he could do a better job than Slade). Btw, Slade is one of the reasons why Frazier is watching the pressure instead of keeping his eyes downfield.
On the defensive side we didn't change scheme...still running the same 4-3 we were running before. Still need fast agile ends to sack, need big line pushers in DL to clog the middle, tall DBs that are fast to cover and LB's that can tackle the guys. They have had 4 years to get those guys. I think we have the talent at the DL I don't think we have the talent at LB at all. Those guys with the exception of Bates don't deserve to be playing D1 football. The secondary have been sporadic, although I am willing to give them a bit of a pass because they have had to do the majority of the work.
For the most part the OL has been pretty good...take Chad Slade out of there and it becomes really good (I'm guessing the coaches don't have confidence in Alex Kozan, but I do think he could do a better job than Slade). Btw, Slade is one of the reasons why Frazier is watching the pressure instead of keeping his eyes downfield.:suicide:
We do have fast DEs, Dee Ford and Corey Lemonier. What we're lacking is the push from the DTs.
StatTiger:
Last week against Clemson, 29.6 percent of Kiehl Frazier’s pass attempts were within 5-yards of the line scrimmage and 22.2 percent were beyond 20-yards.
Against Mississippi State, 59.1 percent of his pass attempts were within 5-yards of the line of scrimmage and he attempted no passes beyond 20-yards of the line of scrimmage.
I was wrong about Coach Leoffler not calling enough â€confidence building pass playsâ€, because he did call the correct plays, Frazier just couldn't connect on them.
it took Jason Campbell and Josh Bynes nearly four years to progress.
All I know is we didn't lose to Louisiana Monroe.
yet
No I agree it was bad, losing Tyler Wilson or not. I'm just not hitching my wagon on that train yet.. is all.
Well we are expected to. We aren't ranking #8