Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Godfather on August 30, 2012, 08:25:23 PM
-
Vandy playing teh Cocks tough. Connor Shaw either dislocated his shoulder or broke his collarbone. Could be a huge blow for the Cocks.
-
leaving the cocks limp.
-
leaving the cocks limp.
Nookie, darlin, I <3 you so much.
-
If there's one thing we know Vandy's capable of...it's beating cocks.
-
I think the "da da da daaaaa" thing the Carolina band plays is 87.361% more annoying than listening to Rocky Top.
-
Spurrier doing his best Malzahn Impression from last year...is Lattimore doing spice on the sidelines. Tha fuck they should be riding him.
-
Nookie, darlin, I <3 you so much.
You <3 limp cocks?
-
You <3 limp cocks?
I <3 nookie.
-
I think the "da da da daaaaa" thing the Carolina band plays is 87.361% more annoying than listening to Rocky Top.
Oh no. Da da da daaaa doesn't make you beg for a bullet like Rocky Top will when UT is winning.
-
UT winning? Who remembers that?
At the end of the day Vandy is still Vandy. Moral victories early in the season.
-
UT winning? Who remembers that?
At the end of the day Vandy is still Vandy. Moral victories early in the season.
Although, I will say with the recruits they are getting, Vandy could become really good really quick. They did a great job across both fronts tonight.
One lousy interference call away form making it a game.
I hope we are solid before we go there and play.
-
So, after Shaw dislocated his shoulder, he came back in to play due to the backup being garbage...Coach Spurrier calls for him a QB Draw? Seriously? Coach, you realize that you have 11 more games in the regular season, right?
-
I gotta say that I was less than impressed with either team.
SC's defensive line gave up on plays that allowed Vandy to make some that they should not have.
Vandy is still Vandy and all the rah rah-ing and moral victories in the world is not going to change that.
-
I gotta say that I was less than impressed with either team.
SC's defensive line gave up on plays that allowed Vandy to make some that they should not have.
Vandy is still Vandy and all the rah rah-ing and moral victories in the world is not going to change that.
They wilted when it mattered.
-
I though USCe defense looked tired most of the game. The offense was unimpressive, but I though Spurriers play calling was shit.
Cocks could be in for a long season as their October stretch is vs. UGA, at LSU, at UF, vs. UT and then vs. Ark (to start Nov) that is brutal.
-
I though USCe defense looked tired most of the game.
It seemed like after the first quarter, they were done. Aside from one or two plays, Clowney was a non-factor as well. Maybe they were just complacent, and Vandy gave them more than they wanted. You couldn't really tell if Vandy was simply overachieving, USCe was slacking, or if both teams are really that shitty. I know everybody up there likes James Franklin, and I think he is good for Vandy too. But at some point, the "This isn't the old Vanderbilt" bravado is going to run out. At the end of the day, it really is still Vanderbilt. The sad part is, Vandy very well may have blown their wad for the season already.
-
I gotta say that I was less than impressed with either team.
SC's defensive line gave up on plays that allowed Vandy to make some that they should not have.
Vandy is still Vandy and all the rah rah-ing and moral victories in the world is not going to change that.
The Marine knows ^^^
I attribute SC's performance (a lot of it anyway) to it being the first game, being rusty, etc. Vandy is just Vandy. They looked better than they really are at times because of SC's tardness.
-
I though USCe defense looked tired most of the game. The offense was unimpressive, but I though Spurriers play calling was shit.
And I don't get it.
They have talent. A lot of it too.
Lattimore looked good. Their offensive line is adequate. They have talented receivers. Their defense has some absolute studs.
I guess their quarterbacks are that bad. But the play calling was atrocious. Spurrier ran his quarterback and he ran Lattimore. It's how Lattimore got hurt last year and how his quarterback is already hurt this year.
-
And I don't get it.
They have talent. A lot of it too.
Lattimore looked good. Their offensive line is adequate. They have talented receivers. Their defense has some absolute studs.
I guess their quarterbacks are that bad. But the play calling was atrocious. Spurrier ran his quarterback and he ran Lattimore. It's how Lattimore got hurt last year and how his quarterback is already hurt this year.
Because, in a way, they are still South Carolina. SC and Vandy's all time records aren't THAT different. At least Vandy has the excuse of being hard to get into. I think the Ole Ball Corch looked off last night.
-
Maybe it's just because USC is and always has been our bitch, but I never have looked at that program as anything other than Mississippi Skrate East. Looked just like em' last night too.
-
Maybe it's just because USC is and always has been our bitch, but I never have looked at that program as anything other than Mississippi Skrate East. Looked just like em' last night too.
Right you are:
SC all time: 555–542–44 (.506) - 1 conf title in 1969 (ACC) - 5 -12 bowl record
Vandy all time: 564–575–50 (.495) - 13 conf titles (SIAA/Southern) - 2-2-1 bowl record
Miss St all time: 507–544–39 (.483) - 1 conf title 1941 (SEC) - 10-6 bowl record
Vandy's w/l record is a little skewed by the last 20 years where all but 1 season (2008 Bobby Johnson 7-6) has been anywhere from a .182 to a .455 winning %. Before the last 20 years they were a better program than SC in the W/L %.
-
All of this is nice, but Vandy is back to where they have the ability to knock off any opponent at any time. Kinda like when Cutler was there. I don't like being that opponent. In most years you never give them a second thought. This year?????
-
All of this is nice, but Vandy is back to where they have the ability to knock off any opponent at any time. Kinda like when Cutler was there. I don't like being that opponent. In most years you never give them a second thought. This year?????
They'll be tough. I'm not worried yet, but that depends more on how we look tomorrow night.
-
I thought Lattimore looked like half the runner he was before he got hurt. Maybe he he will get better as he gains confidence in his knee, but he just didn't look like he was running with the aggressiveness as he did before.
-
Lattimore was Mike Dyer's bitch.
But Mike was too high to realize it.
-
I thought Lattimore looked like half the runner he was before he got hurt. Maybe he he will get better as he gains confidence in his knee, but he just didn't look like he was running with the aggressiveness as he did before.
And he def has a big OL to run behind. They put up a stat on the screen of SC's OL vs Vandy's DL. It read something like:
SC OL Avg - 6'5 309
Vandy DL Avg - 6'2 262
He should have made that his personal playground.
-
Clowney was sucking wind early.
-
Clowney was sucking wind early.
Great analysis...for a girl...
-
Lattimore was Mike Dyer's bitch.
But Mike was too high to realize it.
Yeah, I had a tiny moment of "what might have been" last night... But I'll take a Dyer BCS MVP and be grateful for what we had.
-
And he def has a big OL to run behind. They put up a stat on the screen of SC's OL vs Vandy's DL. It read something like:
SC OL Avg - 6'5 309
Vandy DL Avg - 6'2 262
He should have made that his personal playground.
I saw that.
Vandy was more like 6'3" and I think around 290. But they wre smaller. And they got after it pretty good. They had a good defensive plan and they played with a lot more intensity that we are used to. They looked more like a Woody defense.
-
I saw that.
Vandy was more like 6'3" and I think around 290. But they wre smaller. And they got after it pretty good. They had a good defensive plan and they played with a lot more intensity that we are used to. They looked more like a Woody defense.
Just went back and looked - we were both wrong. It was 6'2 269. Quite smaller than SC's OL. How the hell did he not have 567 yards?
-
Just went back and looked - we were both wrong. It was 6'2 269. Quite smaller than SC's OL. How the hell did he not have 567 yards?
Because they're wiry
-
Slive-balls. Where that picture of the LSU reception vs. the turds where the receiver was call out of bounds?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGMMtlOmRD8